Advertise Contact About This Web Site Webmaster Information
Website Info








Get your website found with San Diego SEO Services!



Do you like to play slots? If so, check out this site for online slots real money



Play online poker at the most trusted online poker room in Canada 888pokercanada



Liberty Slots Casino



Play at online gambling
sites with popular games
like blackjack online



British poker players can try the online poker real money games at Party Poker and get a 100% deposit bonus.



"For house and apartment cleaning services in nyc give Check Maid a try."



O'Reilly Sucks
Blog Archives

January - 2012
February - 2012
March - 2012
April - 2012
May - 2012
June - 2012
July - 2012
August - 2012
September - 2012
October - 2012
November - 2012
December - 2012

January - 2013
February - 2013
March - 2013
April - 2013
May - 2013
June - 2013

Website Links

Answering Questions about Latin Language and Literature

O'Reilly Info

The O'Reilly Iraq Apology Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Spins

Cable News Ratings

Read The Letter O'Reilly Had His Attorney Send me

O'Reilly's Party Enrollment Form Showing Him a Registered Republican

O'Reilly Wins 2004 Misinformer of The Year Award

O'Reilly Death Penalty Lies

O'Reilly on Top 10 Conservative Idiot List 49 Times Since 2001

O'Reilly Calls Mexicans Wetbacks

Mail-to-Bill

Hate-Mail

O'Reilly #5 On Top 25 Right-Wing Journalist List

O'Reilly Factor Year In Review 2009

Factor Pollster Caught Writing GOP Policy Memo

What a Fair & Balanced O'Reilly Factor Would Look Like

Transcript: Bill O'Reilly v Jeremy Glick

Peabody Award Facts

Bill Clinton Enron News

Buzzflash Names O'Reilly Media Putz of The Week

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly & The Republican Party Are Both Corrupt

The Right-Wing Liberal Killer Story O'Reilly Ignored

The Facts About O'Reilly And GE Doing Business With Iran

How to Deal With an O'Reilly Factor Ambush Interview

Why FOX News Loves Juan Williams: The Strings And The Puppet

Blogroll

ultimatetop10s.com/
glenn-beck-sucks.com
AmericaBlog
Crooks & Liars
Progressive Eruptions
Rude Pundit
Moveon.org
Truthout.com
Prison Planet
Apocalypse Cafe
Fox News Boycott
Inebriated Discourse
Hannity Sucks
NewsCorpse.com
Glenn Beck Is An Idiot
Ranker.com
GlennBeckReport.com
lauraingrahamsucks.com

The Factor Guest List Count

June 2013 (11 Shows) Republicans - 75 | Democrats - 15

The Factor Guest List Count Archives

Ratings: The O'Reilly Factor - Total Viewers

Monday - 6-17-13 -- O'Reilly - 2.956
Tuesday - 6-18-13 -- O'Reilly - 0.000
Wednesday - 6-19-13 -- O'Reilly - 0.000
Thursday - 6-20-13 -- O'Reilly - 0.000
Friday - 6-21-13 -- O'Reilly - 0.000

Weekly Factor Average - 0.000

The Cable News Ratings Archives

Oreilly is a polarizing figure and so is online gaming, especially at Begado Casino. There are advocates in Congress proposing a federal law, but Republican detractors. This, according to a supporter of Steve and Oreilly-sucks.com, who runs a Begado Fan Blog. The conservative approach is to stick to legitimate gaming certifications and brands like Begado, says Zachary Gleason.


The O'Reilly Sucks Blog

The Monday 6-17-13 O'Reilly Factor Review
By: Steve - June 18, 2013 - 11:00am

Before I start the review, let me say this. The O'Reilly Factor has become a total 100% partisan right-wing joke. It used to be somewhat of a news show, now it's just a pure arm of the Republican party who is trying to smear President Obama non-stop. O'Reilly does not even report the news anymore, all he does is cry about media bias and have segment after segment on the so-called Obama scandals.

And he does it with 95% Republican guests, while ignoring real news, like the Supreme Court striking down the Arizona voter ID law Monday, that O'Reilly supported and reported on a hundred times. He did not even mention it, even though it was the #1 story in the country.

Now on the the review: The TPM was called: Does the Obama administration really want to solve all these controversies? The biased and crazy Bill O'Reilly said this:
O'REILLY: The Obama administration does not want to tell us what happened in Benghazi, how the IRS got so far out of control, and what exactly the feds are doing snooping around private communications. We are being stonewalled! Director of Intelligence James Clapper misled us when he denied that the NSA collects data on millions of Americans. Then FBI Director Robert Mueller was unable to name the lead investigator on the IRS investigation. Are you kidding me?

If Mueller doesn't know specifics about the IRS investigation, it's because he doesn't want to know. Also, Attorney General Eric Holder doesn't know anything about snooping on reporters! This is an insult to the intelligence of all Americans and it is clear that the Obama administration is not going to aggressively investigate the controversies.

Therefore, Congress must do it and there will have to be special prosecutors appointed in nearly all of the cases. By the time we know what really happened, President Obama will be finishing up his second term. Is this the way the United States government should be running? You make the call.
My God man you are insane. They are doing the investigations, so you are a liar, and of course they take time. Now it's funny that you and your right-wing friends hated special prosecutors under Bush, which is why they voted to stop using them, but suddenly under Obama you now want special prosecutors, good luck with that you right-wing hack.

Then Republican Congressman Trey Gowdy was on to discuss it in a biased segment with no Democratic guests.

Gowdy said this: "One place we ought to be looking, is the Obama-Biden reelection team. I can't prove to you that this goes to the White House, but I don't believe two rogue agents in Cincinnati concocted this scheme on their own. The Obama administration won't get to the bottom of this because they don't have to."

Which is all speculation, so what happened to you only deal in the facts O'Reilly, what a joke.

Gowdy also predicted that special prosecutors will eventually be named, saying this: "In our system oversight is supposed to be provided by Congress and the voters and the media. But with a couple of exceptions, the media is not providing oversight. We need special prosecutors, and one thing we should have done weeks ago is cut the funding to the IRS. Hopefully our fellow citizens will be so disgusted that they demand criminal accountability for these actions."

Then Juan Williams and Mary K. Ham were on with their thoughts on the Washington controversies.

Williams said this: "Republicans and Democrats think the world of Mueller, and I don't know why you think he's willing to sacrifice his credibility for Barack Obama. The FBI is a massive organization, he doesn't know! And Congressman Gowdy doesn't have any evidence linking anybody in the White House or the administration to anything."

Ham said this: "It's an indication of how seriously they're taking this investigation. The bottom line is that it's politically advantageous for the administration not to talk about this stuff for a long time." O'Reilly urged a thorough investigation into the IRS scandal, saying this: "The people who leaked out stuff against individuals should be in prison."

Then the biased stooge Karl Rove was on to talk about former Vice President Dick Cheney, who labeled NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden "a traitor" who has "committed crimes."

Rove said this: "We can all agree, that Mr. Snowden has betrayed the trust of the American people. But whether or not he is guilty of treason, which is punishable by death, can be left to the lawyers. He's more likely to be charged with violating the Espionage Act, which could lead to as much as 100 years in jail if he's found guilty on all charges. If he were truly protecting the Constitution, he should have gone to members of Congress that are sympathetic to his viewpoint. He did not do that - he flew to Hong Kong, gave a bunch of interviews, and is living the high life in a territory of the People's Republic of China."

Dick Cheney is an idiot, treason is the betrayal of one's own country by waging war against it or by consciously or purposely acting to aid its enemies. And Snowden has not done that, at least not that we know of yet.

Then Sharyl Attkisson was on to talk about her computers being hacked. For which O'Reilly speculated it was someone in the Obama administration, even though he has no evidence of that, none.

Attkisson said this: "Last fall there were so many things happening in the Attkisson household, so many strange electronic-related things. Computers were coming on by themselves, sometimes there was a cacophony of computer noise in the middle of the night. At the time I was looking into 'Fast and Furious' and some of the 'green energy' stimulus spending debacles, then the Benghazi story. I think I know who is behind this, but I can't go into that. To come into a private citizen's home and look in my family and work computers? It's outrageous!"

And for the record, my computer at my home has also come on by itself. And btw, it's a common problem with computers, if you google it you get 750,000 results. So it does not mean your computer was hacked, here is a partial answer to that very question from CNET.com:

The ghost machine that turns itself on and off is a fairly common problem. When a computer mysteriously does this, it's a BIOS issue. You typically enter BIOS by restarting your computer and immediately pressing the Delete key repeatedly until you enter the BIOS Utility Screen (usually in blue). The fix is fairly easy.

Then Bernard Goldberg was on to cry about some close ties between TV network executives and Obama administration officials. As just two examples, ABC News President Ben Sherwood's sister is an advisor to President Obama and CBS News President David Rhodes brother is also an advisor to the President.

Goldberg said this: "There are a lot of critics who say there are too many reporters in bed with the administration, and it's literally true in some cases. If you're a reporter and your wife works at the White House, you're in bed with this administration. Reporters are always lecturing politicians about how they have to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest, but apparently these rules don't apply to journalists themselves. What troubles me is that if you're married to somebody who works for Barack Obama, there's a good chance that you like him and his politics. So you have the media bubble that is filled with media people and political operatives."

That is a joke, report some real news and have a Democratic guest on for balance. James Carville is married to a Republican, you fools, does that mean his wife is a biased liberal, of course not. Not to mention, it does not prove any bias, provide some evidence of bias, or shut up you cry baby losers.

Then the biased stooge Adam Carolla was on to cry with O'Reilly about a new study that shows attorneys working for the IRS gave twenty times more in political contributions to President Obama than to Mitt Romney.

Carolla said this: "What do you expect? It's job security for these guys - they love big government, they want bigger government, they want more IRS and more taxes. So who are they going to vote for? How many vegetarians work at a slaughterhouse? But these are the people who take our money and then decide what is a charitable organization. You don't want people whose fingers are on the triggers and switches being political one way or the other."

And finally, the lame Factor tip of the day called: A major announcement. Billy said this: "All five living Presidents have personally signed eight copies of a photograph that was taken when they were together at the Bush Library dedication. The eight signed photographs will be awarded to those folks who make the biggest donations to the Independence Fund, which is purchasing Trackchairs for severely wounded veterans. Those of you who aren't quite so flush can obtain a facsimile of the signed photo for a donation of $25 or more."

Once again, that is not a tip, and btw, O'Reilly is favoring the rich. Why not have random drawings with everyone who donated to get the signed photos, so everyone has an equal chance, instead of getting them to the 8 rich people who donate. So much for looking out for the folks.

Republican Rick Perry Vetoes Equal Pay For Women Bill
By: Steve - June 18, 2013 - 10:00am

Here is more proof the Republican party is in a war on women, the war O'Reilly claims is not real.

Texas Governor Rick Perry (R) vetoed a bill on Friday that would have allowed women suffering wage discrimination to take legal action, alleging that the measure duplicates federal law, which already allows employees to file a claim with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

On average, women earn 77 cents of every dollar a man makes, though the disparity is even greater for African American and Hispanic women.

HB 950 builds on the federal Lilly Ledbetter Act, which strengthened women's ability to challenge pay discrimination. Supporters argued that the state legislation would provide uniformity between state and federal anti-discrimination laws and allow parties to proceed in a nearby state court, while at the same time avoid the increased expense of having to proceed in a federal court which may be far away.

Lilly Ledbetter protections also do not apply to state cases absent action by the legislature. Forty-two states have passed sate-based equal pay laws, recognizing that Lilly Ledbetter was not enough.

OSHA Workplace Inspections Only Happen Every 99 Years
By: Steve - June 17, 2013 - 10:00am

A petrochemical plant in Geismar, Louisiana that exploded on Thursday, killing one person and injuring 73, has not been inspected by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in the past two decades, according to an analysis by ThinkProgress.

The Williams Olefins plant, which produces about 1.3 billion pounds of ethylene and 90 million pounds of polymer grade propylene, according to the company's website, does not have any recorded inspections for plants producing either substance in OSHA's database since 1993.

The explosion, fueled by propylene, started at 8:37 a.m. and burned for more than three hours. Three hundred workers were evacuated and residents within a two-mile radius were told by authorities to remain in their homes.

The same plant also had an accident in 2009. At that time, 60 pounds of flammable mixture was released, causing a fire that did not lead to injuries. Louisiana has experienced at least two other explosions in petrochemical facilities in the last two years: an explosion at the Westlake Chemicals vinyl plant in Geismar that "sent a cloud of toxic vinyl chloride and hydrochloric acid over the town" in 2012 and another at a Multi-Chem Group plan in New Iberia in 2011.

Thursday's blast comes just months after about 30 tons of ammonium nitrate exploded at a fertilizer plant in West, Texas in April. That accident killed 15 people and injured more than 160. The West plant hadn't been inspected by OSHA since 1985 and also slipped by six other regulatory agencies.

While the surrounding population near the Williams plant seems to be small, thousands of chemical plants across the country pose risks to large populations. Nearly 7,000 have reported that a worst-case scenario would impact populations greater than 1,000 people, and 90 plants would impact more than 1 million people.

Due to low funding and staffing issues, OSHA inspections have become very rare. The average workplace only gets a visit from an inspector every 99 years. Yet budget cuts may make things even worse: sequestration will force the agency to cut its budget by 8.2 percent, which could mean 1,200 fewer workplace inspections.

Which is what the Republicans have done, and it is what they want. They are in the back pocket of the Corporations, they give them money to get elected and re-elected, and the Republicans vote to cut the funding for OSHA so their businesses are not inspected very often.

Pressure has been mounting on the petrochemical industry to improve safety after a blast in 2005 at BP refinery in Texas killed 15 people and injured 170, one of the worst industrial accidents in decades. Reuters reports that these plants operate massive equipment under intense pressure and high heat, which makes them prone to fires and explosions.

Notice that O'Reilly has not reported any of this, because he does not want to make the Republicans look bad, and expose what they do. He ignores the story to cover for them, while complaining that the liberal media ignores Obama scandals to cover for the President. As he does the very same thing for the Republican party. In other words, O'Reilly is too busy trying to make Obama look bad to report some real news.

Proof O'Reilly Is A Partisan Hack Over NSA Spying
By: Steve - June 16, 2013 - 10:00am

A recent Pew poll about the NSA surveillance program revealed overall public support-but the real story was the partisan numbers: Republicans who were less concerned about government overreach in 2006 have changed their minds in 2013.

You can see this shift in the views of some pundits; Fox host Sean Hannity has essentially flipped his take on this entirely, what was fine during the Bush years is an outrage in the Obama era. But he's not the only one who's shifted. Take Fox News host Bill O'Reilly. He has spent the past decade voicing basically unqualified support for the Bush-era terrorism policies, and has commended Obama for continuing or even expanding them.

It was interesting to see how O'Reilly has come down on the current NSA controversy. On June 6th, O'Reilly told his viewers that the NSA program to build a database of phone records was being criticized by some liberals, and that he agreed:
O'REILLY: Now Talking Points usually supports war on terror strategies but this one, a major intrusion on the privacy of all Americans. This one is dangerous to us.
The danger, to O'Reilly, seemed to be the idea that the government would use this information to attack its enemies:
O'REILLY: So, for example, some conservative senator calls Trixie at the Hot Licks massage parlor, all right, guess who knows it? And guess who can put it out any time they want.
The revelations around the NSA PRISM program, which involves storing of electronic communication like e-mail, were a real problem. On 6-10-13 O'Reilly declared the program "clearly unconstitutional, saying this: "You have to have probable cause to violate the privacy of an American. This PRISM program should be shut down immediately."

To make matters more confusing, O'Reilly backed away from his first reaction to the phone records, telling viewers that "in the name of national security that might be acceptable."

So what was he saying back in 2006, when very similar revelations about Bush's NSA surveillance programs surfaced? Here's what he had to say back on 5-11-2006:
O'REILLY: Just in time to embarrass Gen. Michael Hayden, a proposed new CIA chief, somebody leaked information about Hayden's NSA collecting information about the phone calls of Americans.

Now, the NSA is not listening to or taping the calls. It is compiling data about who is being called and running it through computers to see if any terrorist link can be found.

Now, I have no problem with this personally. If the government was listening to my calls or secretly taping them, then I'd have a big problem. But simply trying to ascertain where the calls are going is no big deal to me.

I'm sure others disagree, because others disagree with just about every anti-terror method the USA uses, including coerced interrogation, military tribunals for terrorists who are charged, Guantanamo, the Patriot Act, no-fly list, on and on and on.

If it were up to the ACLU, all terrorists would be given civilian lawyers, Geneva Convention protections, and would have no surveillance whatsoever worldwide with a U.S. criminal warrant.
So the story then was really an opportunity for him to go after Bush critics on the left. And that was still the point when a judge struck down the NSA's Terrorist Surveillance Program, which allowed warantless surveillance of some telephone and internet communication.

On 8-21-2006 O'Reilly was furious at the judge. As he said to one guest:
O'REILLY: See, I don't understand Judge Taylor. Maybe you can help me. Does she want Americans to die? There isn't any criminal proceeding in this case. This is an overarch to try to get intelligence information from calls to suspected Al-Qaeda overseas, not domestic. Does she want people to die?

Does she want dead people in the street here in America? Because I'm sure that she would not only oppose the NSA program, she would oppose a course of interrogation, profiling at the airports. She would oppose every anti-terror measure the Bush administration has put in just because they are the Bush administration. But the unintended consequences of the opposition is death.
O'Reilly's passionate defense of Bush and his muddled reaction to the recent revelations constitute a rather noticeable shift. As he told viewers on 6-12-13, "Talking Points respects differing opinions on this issue."

Well, he should, he's had different opinions himself, depending on what the political party of the President is, when it's a Republican he supports and defends it, but when it's a Democrat he is opposed to it and calls for it to be shut down.

The Friday 6-14-13 O'Reilly/Crowley Factor Review
By: Steve - June 15, 2013 - 11:00am

There was no TPM because O'Reilly had the far-right stooge Monica Crowley fill in or him. Her biased Top Story was called: President Obama's scandals. Crowley said this:
CROWLEY: "There is still no word from President Obama about what's really going on with our unraveling federal government. As scandals at the IRS, DOJ, NSA, and the State Department continue to spiral out of control, we the people still do not have answers from the man in charge. According to a new Fox News survey, only 48% of voters think the President is 'honest and trustworthy.' If the President wants to change that, he should take control of the chaos and give the people some answers."
Then Democratic Party official Dick Harpootlian was on to discuss it.

Harpootlian said this: "I'm in Columbia, South Carolina, and when you go to Main Street here nobody is talking about the NSA or Benghazi or the IRS. They're talking about the inability of Congress to pass a budget or to create jobs and improve lives. This is all not that important compared to what are we going to do in Syria, what are we going to do about jobs, what are we going to do about things that really matter."

Crowley said this: "We have very severe abuses of power in the IRS and the Department of Justice, we also have four dead Americans in Benghazi and no answers. The President has shown no anger, no availability. If I were a president who was innocent of all the allegations, I would be shouting from the rooftops that no one in my administration is guilty."

Then Mark Everson, who ran the IRS during the Bush administration was on to talk about a new report that alleges more than 1,000 IRS employees misused their government credit cards.

Everson said this: "This targeting is very unfortunate and totally wrong, but I am actually reassured by Director Mueller's testimony because when something is handed over to the FBI you want it to go through normal channels, you don't want it to be a political brouhaha. He has a lot of other things to worry about, terrorism investigations and other things, so I think it's right that this has gone into the normal process."

Then Crowley talked about the 2016 presidential election, even though it's 3 fricking years away. She claimed it is shaping up as a duel between Hillary Clinton and New Jersey Governor Chris Christie.

Republican strategist Tony Sayegh said this: "Benghazi is not going away. Democrats have tried to marginalize it as a political issue, but 72% of Americans want a continued investigation into what truly happened in Benghazi. Hillary Clinton is going to be a part of this, no matter what happens."

Democratic strategist Tara Dowdell downplayed new allegations that some State Department officials were involved in criminal wrongdoing during Clinton's tenure at State, saying this: "These are just allegations, they have not been proven true. But if something did happen under her tenure, running any large department is messy. Every President and every Secretary of State has had some controversy."

Then the biased right-wing stooge Lou Dobbs was on, who cried about America's welfare state.

Dobbs said this: "It's frustrating to think that one in five households is on food stamps, and just about half of the population receives some sort of federal assistance. What is most alarming is that we are in the fifth year of a so-called 'recovery' and we are still not creating jobs, we are not discussing how to restore prosperity. The fiscal policy of the country is in absolute shreds, there is no accountability, and the leadership seems to have forgotten that this country is all about prosperity for every American."

What a jerk, the jobs are not coming back very fast because your right-wing friends are blocking every jobs bill Obama and the Democrats want to pass. And they are doing it because if the economy improves a lot Obama will look good and Hillary Clinton win win the 2016 election and be the next President. Republicans are putting politics ahead of the good of the people, which is treason in my book.

Then immigration attorney Francisco Hernandez was on to talk about the immigration bill, he urged both parties to compromise.

Hernandez said this: "We have been clamoring for the federal government to act on this issue for the last ten years, and why are we now getting afraid to do so? Republicans need to embrace this - let's negotiate and debate, and when both sides come away from the negotiating table unhappy, you'll know it's a good bill."

Crowley insisted that any immigration bill must be demonstrably good for America and the economy, saying this: "U.S. immigration laws should serve only one purpose, and that is to advance our national interest. They should not be there to advance anybody's political agendas, but the Democrats are trying to lock in their advantage among Hispanic voters while Republicans are running around trying to make up ground with Hispanic voters."

And finally, Crowley ran a re-run of O'Reilly's interview with Willie Robertson from Duck Dynasty, which I will not report on because it's a re-run.

Let me add something, Monica Crowley is the biggest Obama hating right-wing hack on the planet, and yet, O'Reilly let her host his show. This shows one thing, that O'Reilly is also a biased right-wing hack, and not the Independent he claims to be. Because no Independent in their right mind would let Monica Crowley host his show.

The other fill-ins are Laura Ingraham and Greg Gutfeld, who are also partisan right-wing hacks. So ask yourself what that says about O'Reilly. Basically he is lying when he says he is a non-partisan Independent who has been fair to President Obama. And if he is lying about that, how can you believe anything else he says about anything.

Larry Flynt Says All Republicans Are Mean-Spirited Racists
By: Steve - June 15, 2013 - 10:00am

This week Larry Flynt explained why he tends to be so critical of Republicans. "I've never met a Republican that wasn't mean-spirited," Flynt said, "and in his heart, a racist."

"I'm sure there are some that are probably not," he admitted. "But I'm just telling you what my experience has been and my exposure to conservative Republicans: they're a nightmare."

Later in the interview, Flynt called the fact that women get paid 25% less for doing the same jobs as men. "the biggest travesty that we have in this country," a problem he also blamed on the GOP. "The reason why women don't have equal pay, it's Republicans, it's not the Democrats." He said it's also Republicans who are trying to block immigration reform and "control women's reproductive cycles."

Flynt predicted that no matter who runs on the Democratic side for president, "I do not see the Republicans ever winning another national campaign in the next three to five decades." If he had anything nice to say about conservatives it was that "you can never accuse a Republican of not having a spine-they've got one."

The Thursday 6-13-13 O'Reilly Factor Review
By: Steve - June 14, 2013 - 11:00am

The TPM was called: Can President Obama get a handle on all the controversies? The biased and crazy Bill O'Reilly said this:
O'REILLY: President Obama's job approval rating is falling faster than Eric Holder's credibility. The latest Fox News poll has the President's job approval at 44%, a 3-point drop since the beginning of the year. Mr. Obama has not been aggressive in defining Benghazi, the IRS, snooping on reporters, and snooping on Americans.

He has put forth no specific strategies to stop the bleeding in his administration. Attorney General Holder is a lightning rod, but he's still there; there have been no firings at the IRS; there has been no further definition about who screwed up in Libya. Throughout his life Barack Obama has been patient, he is not a confrontational man or a problem-solver.

Press conferences are simply an opportunity for Mr. Obama to give mini-speeches and his trips around the country are primarily to raise money. You may have noticed that Mr. Obama rarely gives interviews any more, and when he does they are mostly orchestrated. So we have an executive branch that is largely unaccountable. President Obama knows he doesn't have to run again and that he can very possibly ride all this stuff out.
Notice that O'Reilly used a Fox News poll, while Gallup has Obama at 47% approval. Which is only a 2% drop since March of 2013. Proving that O'Reilly is cherry picking a poll to make you see what he wants you to see. Notice that the entire show is nothing but Republicans, so much for fair and balanced, it's all right-wing bias.

The far-right Charles Krauthammer was on, who said this: "You have staggered upon the truth, and there are two things happening here. Number one, when there's trouble out there, you insulate the President and make sure that the focus is on the people beneath him. That's nothing new, but what is new is President Obama's leadership style, which doesn't exist. The man is a bystander to his own presidency, he acts like he just stumbled upon the scene of an accident and he's catching up. The lack of leadership from this President is quite unique."

Then Mark Zaid was on to talk about the NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former NSA contractor, has been lionized by some, vilified by others.

Zaid said this: "At this time Snowden is a criminal, and we'll see as time goes by whether he's a hero or a villain. He's not helping himself by revealing to the Chinese and the world that the United States was engaged in cyber-operations against the Chinese. That puts him towards the villain category, and he is the leaker of classified information for which he had no authorization, so he's a criminal! An individual does not make a determination as to what's in the best national security interests of the United States."

Then 2 far-right stooges Tim Graham & Erick Erickson were on to help O'Reilly slam Chris Matthews. Wit no guest to give the other side, so it was 3 Republicans slamming the liberal Matthews.

On his MSNBC show Chris Matthews called Billy a "hard right-wing guy" who has a "black Irish" look. And one part of that is true for sure, O'Reilly is a hard right-wing guy.

Erickson said this: "As ratings go down and as people get more disenchanted with liberalism, they're becoming more shrill and trying to keep the core audience. There's not a lot of entertainment on MSNBC, there's a lot of anger and they don't relate to people in the heartland."

Graham said this: "They don't have any substance to offer, they're terrible shows without anything to say. Chris Matthews is just unglued these days."

O'Reilly reported that MSNBC's ratings have taken a nosedive, saying this: "This is a desperate attempt by Matthews to get attention. In the last six months things have fallen apart for MSNBC. The core liberal audience is disenchanted with President Obama and now Matthews has to call me names because he doesn't have anything else."

Notice they did not even discuss what Matthews said, all they did was slam him for low ratings. Because they know what Matthews said is true, that O'Reilly is a hard right-wing guy.

Then Laura Ingraham was on for some real insanity, her and O'Reilly claimed that the morning after pill will lead to more rape, and std's.

Ingraham reacted to a judge's decision that the the 'Plan B' morning-after pill should be available to girls of all ages, saying this: "Some girls as young as 9 or 10 or 11 have reproductive capacity, and the studies on this drug are non-existent for girls of that age. We need long-term studies on the effects on young girls' future fertility and hormonal development. For most girls that report sexual activity at that young age, it's coerced sexual activity, so this helps people who want to take advantage of young women. Anybody who abuses a young girl can take her into a pharmacy and get the pill without her parents being involved on any level."

Then Jim Gaffigan was on to talk about his book "Dad is Fat" that is filled with observations about his large family.

Gaffigan said this: "The title came from my son, whose first sentence was, 'Dad is fat.' He showed it to me and then I put him up for adoption. Dads are the vice president of the executive branch of the family. The mom is Bill Clinton, feeling the pain, and we're Al Gore, telling them to turn out the lights."

The 46-year-old Gaffigan also said this: "My dad essentially just brought home the bacon - he didn't shop for the bacon or cook it, he ate the bacon! It's not that my father and his generation didn't do anything, it's that they didn't feel guilty!"

And finally, the lame waste of time Factor tip of the day called: A helping hand. Billy said this: "When someone asks you to help out a charitable enterprise, try to find some way to do it if you possibly can."

What a joke, thank you Mr. obvious. That tip is just stupid, it's like saying if you get robbed call the police.

O'Reilly Ignoring Issa Refusing To Release Transcripts Story
By: Steve - June 14, 2013 - 10:00am

O'Reilly is still saying he does not know if the White House ordered the IRS to target conservative groups, even though the Cincinnati IRS manager of the screening group, a career veteran at the agency who identified himself as Republican, told investigators that Washington did not direct the targeting.

Issa even called the White House spokesman Jay Carney a paid liar, but O'Reilly has ignored that too. Because he is a partisan right-wing hack who does not want you to know these facts. He wants you to continue to think the White House ordered the IRS to target the conservative groups, when the man who was in charge of the IRS where it happened, and who is a Republican, said the White House DID NOT order it.

House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) is refusing to release transcripts of interviews with Internal Revenue Service (IRS) agents that allegedly prove how political officials in the Obama administration directed the IRS to target conservative groups applying for 501 (c)(4) status.

Issa, the biased Republican whose committee is conducting an investigation into the agency's behavior, provided CNN excerpts of interviews with IRS agents on June 2nd and assured host Candy Crowley that "the whole transcript will be put out."

But in a letter to the top Democrat on the Committee, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), Issa backed away from his ppomise, arguing that releasing the transcripts would needlessly jeopardize the integrity of the investigation and hamper the Committee's ability to get to the truth.

During his appearance on CNN, Issa called White House Press Secretary Jay Carney a paid liar and claimed that the spokesperson is making up things about what happens in calling this local rogue, leading several Republicans to speak out against his tactics.

A week later, Cummings appeared on CNN to challenge the Chairman. "I want those transcripts to be released," Cummings said. "I'm willing to come on your show next week with the Chairman with the transcripts if he agrees to do that. If he doesn't, I'll release them by the end of the week."

And O'Reilly has said nothing about it, not one word, he has ignored the entire story to do what James Carville said, put out right-wing propaganda for the Republican party instead of reporting all the facts.

Cummings insisted that the full interviews will demonstrate that the White House was not involved in this, pointing out that the Cincinnati IRS manager of the screening group, a career veteran at the agency who identified himself as Republican, told investigators that Washington did not direct the targeting.

"I do not believe that the screening of these cases had anything to do other than consistency and identifying issues that needed to have further development," the individual told investigators according to a portion of the transcripts released by the Democratic staff on the House Oversight Committee.

Cummings condemned Issa's refusal to release the full transcripts in a statement on Tuesday. "Chairman Issa changes his mind so fast that even when I agree with him, we're not on the same page," he said. "I fully support responsible oversight, but cherry picking transcript excerpts to fuel partisan and unsubstantiated claims is not a credible or effective way to investigate."

An Inspector General's report into the matter concluded that the IRS relied on inappropriate criteria while vetting groups applying for nonprofit status by using a BOLO-Be on the Look Out-list and blamed IRS officials in Washington, DC, for insufficient oversight of lower-level staffers.

However, it specifically concluded that "All of these officials stated that the criteria were not influenced by any individual or organization outside the IRS."

The Wednesday 6-12-13 O'Reilly Factor Review
By: Steve - June 13, 2013 - 11:00am

The TPM was called: How do Americans feel about government spying? The biased and crazy Bill O'Reilly said this:
O'REILLY: A whistleblower says the National Security Agency is logging phone calls made by Americans and storing them for possible scrutiny in the war on terror. Also, there are unproven allegations that some emails may be in the hands of American intelligence as well.

As Talking Points said last night, the accumulation of phone data without anyone listening to the calls is most likely constitutional. But gathering up emails, actual words, without a specific warrant, is definitely unconstitutional.

A CBS News poll shows that Americans disapprove of the government collecting phone records by a 58% to 38% margin, and 60% of Americans are not concerned that that government may be monitoring their internet use.

It used to be that liberal Americans strongly objected to this kind of government snooping, but President Obama believes phone call surveillance is absolutely vital to the war on terror.

The President has an obligation to tell all Americans exactly what the NSA, CIA and other intel agencies are doing. Are they really accumulating emails from Americans? It's not going to hurt the war on terror if we know that.

Finally, it's very interesting to see liberals battle liberals and conservatives versus conservatives on this situation. This is one issue that has crossed party lines, big time.
And of course O'Reilly does not say a word about his hypocrisy and double standards, because under Bush he supported it, but under Obama he does not. O'Reilly even called people who opposed the Patriot act under Bush un-American, and said they wanted Americans to die.

Then the biased right-wing stooge from Fox James Rosen was on with the latest on allegations that the State Department covered up misconduct during Hillary Clinton's tenure. Which is a nothing/unproven story nobody cares about except O'Reilly and people at Fox news.

Rosen said this: "I've been reporting on the case of U.S. Ambassador to Belgium Howard Gutman, who was investigated for pedophilia and prostitution charges. My reporter's gut tells me that this is headed toward disclosures that will almost certainly prove problematic for former and current top State Department officials, including individuals close to Hillary Clinton."

Which is just laughable, how is it the fault of Hillary Clinton if some Ambassador in fricking Belgium was investigated for pedophilia and prostitution. And notice he "speculates" that it "might" be a problem for people "close" to Hillary. Even if Hillary knew about it, who cares, and how is this a big news story.

This is just another made up scandal by the biased idiots at Fox to try and hurt Hillary politically when she runs for President in 2016. And O'Reilly is helping them by allowing idiots like Rosen to report it on his show.

Then Carl Cameron, who recapped Wednesday's congressional testimony by NSA Director Keith Alexander was on.

Cameron said this: "The NSA chief defended the program and the personnel. He said they are trying to do what is right, that they work lawfully, and that the billions of records have been 'critical' to disrupting dozens of terrorist actions. We do know that the programs can reveal a lot of information, but the ACLU is suing the Obama administration to end collection of all the data. Remember that the phone and internet service providers were granted immunity from lawsuits five years ago. If collecting these records isn't a violation of civil liberties, why would they need immunity?"

Then Republican Senator Marco Rubio, who has been generally supportive of the surveillance programs was on.

Rubio said this: "I think there is information in the press that is not accurate, and I think there is information that could be declassified that would allow people to have more confidence in how these very important programs are run. This is a tough issue because on one hand we have programs we know are effective, but on the other hand people have an expectation of privacy."

Rubio also laid out the odds of immigration reform passing Congress, saying this: "It all depends on border security and on insuring that it doesn't cost the taxpayer. The bottom line is that if we can secure the border and ensure that this doesn't happen again, I think it will pass."

And then after 20 minutes of non-stop right-wing spin a Democrat was on, Bob Beckel, put out his thoughts on the government surveillance programs.

Beckel said this: "They're snooping around and they are invading our civil liberties. Ever since 9/11 and the Patriot Act, we have passed more legislation creating more of these investigative units. Every time they do something they invade our civil liberties and what they're doing now is clearly unconstitutional. I give them credit for trying to protect us, but what's new is the wholesale collection of information about average Americans. They are harming civil liberties, which is harming the nation!"

Then the part-time Fox news Democrat Kirsten Powers and Republican Kate Obenshain were on to discuss it.

Powers said this: "I am comfortable to a point, with the idea of a computer going through phone data and looking for connections and then getting a warrant if they need to go further. I am not comfortable with them storing that data in perpetuity. I think once they've sifted through it, if there is nothing there they should get rid of it."

Obenshain said this: "I have a problem with all of this. Though the administration might say that it is handling this legally, this is an administration that said it would never target conservative groups and that there is no data collection program for millions of Americans. The administration has a pattern of lying about targeting its political adversaries."

Then Adam Carolla was on to talk about the 33-year-old Tennessean Orlando Shaw, who has fathered 22 children with 14 different women.

Carolla said this: "Orlando, get over your latex allergy, and if it were up to me, I would put a boot on your junk. I don't trust you and you should never be able to have sex again. I would also like to parade you around as the world's worst father. We stopped judging people like you a long time ago because some idiot told us we couldn't judge. We judge smokers more harshly than we judge deadbeat dads."

O'Reilly recommended a specific sentence for Shaw, saying this: "I think Orlando should go to jail for ten years. He's a menace, he doesn't care, he thinks it's a joke, so let's put him away for abusing these children."

Are you guys for real, how is that news and what business is it to you. If this guy wants to have 22 kids or 222 kids, he can. It is none of your business, and you two should shut up about it and report some real news.

Then Juliet Huddy was on for did you see that, she talked about authorities in Britain, who have banned a TV ad that features a suggestively writhing Pamela Anderson.

Huddy said this: "This ad is for a website, but you never figured that out. They felt this is sexist and objectifies women, justifiably so. The ad has nothing to do with the product they're selling, which is this web domain. The same ad was also banned in Australia back in 2010."

Earth to Huddy and O'Reilly, who cares! This is not news, and nobody cares what they are doing on tv in England. Report some real news that happened in America, idiots.

And finally, the lame Factor tip of the day called: A patriotic display. That I will not report on, because it's not a tip of the day, it's a thank you to some millionaire who donated money to a veterans trackchair charity.

Even Brit Hume Disagrees With O'Reilly Over NSA Story
By: Steve - June 13, 2013 - 10:00am

Appearing on FoxNews.com Tuesday afternoon, Fox senior political analyst Brit Hume dismissed the uproar over the National Security Agency's snooping revelations as misplaced hysteria, adding that he sees no abuse whatsoever in what has been revealed.

And btw folks, O'Reilly has said a million times that he never speculates and that he only deals in the facts. But he is speculating that the NSA has done something wrong, with no facts to back up his claims.

"Of the abuses that Snowden claims exist in this program," Hume continued, "his explanation has been vague to the point of non-existent."

Hume then told host Chris Stirewalt he doesn't see anything wrong with what has been revealed about the NSA's surveillance programs:
HUME: To tell you the truth, now that I know about the NSA, I don’t think there have been any abuses, frankly. I think that this guy’s disclosure of the program was an abuse of a sort.
Remember this too, when the Republican George W. Bush was the President O'Reilly supported all this stuff, including the warrantless wiretapping that the Bush administration said they could do without the FISA court or Congress having oversight. This NSA data collection has the FISA court and the Congress to monitor it, and yet O'Reilly is suddenly opposed to it, even when there is no evidence they have violated any privacy rights.

Now here is a cold hard truth, O'Reilly is only making a big deal about it to try and claim it's another Obama scandal to hurt him politically. When there is no scandal, and O'Reilly supported it under Bush. He even called people who opposed it un-American and said they want Americans to die. If that's not being a biased partisan hack, I'm Elvis.

Despite Stirewalt countering that there is clear abuse in what the NSA has been doing, Hume suggested that it is no difference than the surveillance utilized by government agencies like the Social Security Administration, which keeps record of individual income over a lifetime.

"Think of all the information these agencies possess," Hume said, "but the record of abuse by most government agencies has been pretty good."

Hume concluded with this: "The hysteria about this is misplaced."

Hot Links

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Electic Car Company Success

The Most Annoying Celebs Who Should Go Away

Bias Alert: O'Reilly Spins Presidential Election Media Study

O'Reilly & Fox Still Ignoring GOP Voter Registration Fraud Story

Biased O'Reilly Tells Romney To Call Obama A Socialist

O'Reilly Slams Obama With Dishonest Tip Of The Day

O'Reilly & Brit Hume Spin And Lie For Mitt Romney

Fox Promotes Ridiculous Study Of Doctors & Obamacare

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media & Obama

Low Gas Prices Shut O'Reilly & The Repiblicans Up Fast

I Am Waiting For The O'Reilly Health Care Bill Apology

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About The Media

O'Reilly Ignores MRC Calling For Sharpton Firing

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Wrong On The Deficit

O'Reilly & Fox Lie That Obama To Blame For High Gas Prices

Scientist Group Slams Celebs Like Snooki & O'Reilly

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About America

O'Reilly & Ingraham Lied About Planned Parenthood (Again)

Fox Unemployment Chart Shows Their Right-Wing Bias

U.S. Troops Burn A Box Of O'Reilly's Books

Kelly & O'Reilly Make Up Another Green Energy Scandal

O'Reilly Ignoring All The Stock Market Increases

O'Reilly Flat Out LIED About The Debt Obama Added

O'Reilly Caught Doctoring Florida Mans E-Mail

O'Reilly Ignored Michele Bachmann Church Scandal

O'Reilly & Morris Lied About The Debt Polls

O'Reilly Hypocrisy On The West/Schultz Story

The Truth About Those Bush Tax Cuts

Number Of Tea Party Events Down 50 Percent

NWLC Says O'Reilly Statement Made Up & Offensive

Video Proof O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Hack

O'Reilly Gets It Totally Wrong On Norway Terrorist

Norway Terrorist Info O'Reilly Ignored

O'Reilly Ignoring Ensign/Coburn Hush Money Scandal

O'Reilly Calls Obama Health Care Waivers A Scam

O'Reilly Complains About Losing In His Own Poll

O'Reilly Ignores Republican Hypocrisy On Judicial Filibusters

O'Reilly Ignoring Republican Unpopularity

O'Reilly Tells GOP How To Beat Obama With Scare Tactics

O'Reilly & Fox Are Lying To You About The Debt

O'Reilly Spins The 2008 Presidential Media Study

Important Tax Information Bill O'Reilly Has Ignored

O'Reilly Ignored McCain Op-Ed On Bin Laden

O'Reilly Scrubs Website & Podcast Of False Obama Claims

O'Reilly Ignored DOJ Black Panther Report

O'Reilly Still Ignoring Wisconsin Judge's Order Story

O'Reilly Ignored Jobs & Unemployment Report

Fox News Town Hall Protester Hypocrisy & Double Standards

O'Reilly & Varney Speculate About Oil Prices

O'Reilly Spins The Quinnipiac Temperature Poll

O'Reilly Proves How Stupid He Is Again

How O'Reilly Puts Out Right-Wing Propaganda

Fox News Insider Admits They Make Things Up

Luntz Admits Fox Has Anti-Obama Focus Groups

Reagan SG Says Health Care Bill Constitutional

O'Reilly Ignores Gore Answer To His Question

O'Reilly Wonders How The Moon Got There

More Republican Hate & Racism O'Reilly Has Ignored

Another Poll O'Reilly Has Totally Ignored

O'Reilly Thinks We Are Still In A Recession

O'Reilly's Nazi Comment Defense Was Laughable

O'Reilly Caught Lying About China & India

Fox News The Least Trusted Cable News Network

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media (Again)

O'Reilly Claims Estate Tax A Seizure Of Property

O'Reilly Called Bernie Sanders A Loon

Bloomberg Tax Cut Poll Proves O'Reilly Was Lying

O'Reilly Ignored Positive DADT Study & Story

O'Reilly & Fox Ignore Judge Being A 9-11 Truther

More Real News O'Reilly Has Ignored

More Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Ratings

O'Reilly Got The Ireland Economic Crisis Wrong

O'Reilly Ignored The Tom Delay Conviction Story

Women Of America: You Need To Read This

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly Is Dishonest & Crazy

O'Reilly Nazi Comparison Hypocrisy

O'Reilly Ignores New Poll While Promoting Paladino

Andrew Sullivan Called O'Reilly A Dishonest Propagandist

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Nevada RCP Senate Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Right-Wing Abortion Bomber Terrorism Story

Fox & O'Reilly Ignored Friday Pro-Mosque NY Rally

O'Reilly Busted For Health Insurance Premium Lies

Most Factor Gear Made in Vietnam And China

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

O'Reilly Busted For 1st Time Retraction Lie

The Bill O'Reilly Non-Apology Shirley Sherrod Apology

O'Reilly & The Right Are Racist Idiots

O'Reilly Ignored Tea Party Express Racism Story

O'Reilly Compares Gay People To Al-Qaeda

Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Rating Polls

O'Reilly Ignored Mark Kirk Military Award Lie Story

Where Are The Sedition Charges Now O'Reilly

O'Reilly Caught In A Massive Lie About Jail Time

O'Reilly Running Ads For Emergency Food Supply

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Tea Party Militia Links

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Gallup Tea Party Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Harris Poll Showing Republicans Are Stupid

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Health Reform Bill Tax

O'Reilly Caught Lying About NEJM Health Care Survey

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

The Truth About Ratings For News Shows

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Spin Doctor

O'Reilly Spinning Fox News Most Trusted Poll

Fox News Did Not Air Hope For Haiti Telethon

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Obama Terrorism Polls

O'Reilly Caught Lying About House Ethics Committee

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Increase

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Limbaugh Racism

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Religious Festival

O'Reilly Caught Red Handed Lying About CNN

O'Reilly Caught Violating Journalistic Standards Again

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The ACLU & Racial Profiling

More Proof O'Reilly & FOX News Do Not Tell The Truth

O'Reilly Called Bruce Springsteen Un-American & Un-Patriotic

The Bill O'Reilly Senate Torture Report Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Obama Approval Numbers

FOX News Caught Lying About Obama Budget

O'Reilly Busted For Helping GOP Smear Pelosi

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Obama Earmark Promise

Military.com Report Proves O'Reilly Wrong About Homeless Vets

O'Reilly Places 7th in 2008 Wingnut of The Year Award

O'Reilly Denys Reality About Abstinence Only Programs




Proof The O'Reilly Factor is Biased Against Barack Obama
O'Reilly said he is a non-partisan Independent, who is fair to both sides, and that he has been fair to Barack Obama. To check that claim I did a 3 month study of the Factor, it started on August 1st, 2008, and ran until October 31st, 2008. I watched the Factor every night and counted the negative and positive comments for Obama and McCain.

Visit the web page I set up, and you will see the stunning bias from O'Reilly and his mostly Republican guests against Barack Obama. Then you will see there is no doubt Bill O'Reilly is a dishonest and biased Conservative. This study is conclusive proof that O'Reilly is in the tank for John McCain.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The 3 Month Factor Bias Study:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/3mbiasnumbers.htm

Proof O'Reilly Lied About The Balance on His Show
O'Reilly claims the factor is balanced, and that he personally makes sure every week he has an equal number of Republican and Democrat guests. This is a bold faced lie, and I can prove it. I put together a web page that shows the guest list from the factor for the last 2 weeks. Read it and you will see with your own eyes that Bill O'Reilly is lying when he says the factor is balanced.

And remember that we are 3 weeks before a major Presidential election, or the Republican bias numbers would be worse than it is normally. O'Reilly is actually having more Democrats on than he usually does, and the balance is still not even close. If we were not so close to an election it would be a lot worse.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The Lies About The Factor Balance:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreillybalanced.htm

O'Reilly Sucks Investigation: Dishonesty, Deception, And Bias By Bill O'Reilly
O'Reilly claims there are no Republicans or Conservative groups that rival George Soros. O'Reilly said the top three conservative tax-exempt foundations are totally dwarfed by Soros and the radical Ford Foundation. And that they have 15 times more the assets. George Soros net worth is $8.5 billion, the Ford Foundation has a net worth of $13 billion. But the seven billionaires who donate to Newt Gingrich and other right-wing causes have a combined net worth of $34.8 billion dollars.

Somehow O'Reilly claims that Soros and the Ford Foundation have 15 times more the assets than anyone on the right. When the seven billionaires alone who give money to Newt, have roughly $14 billion more than Soros and the Ford Foundation combined.

Visit the web page below to see the massive money O'Reilly has ignored from the right:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreilly-investigation.htm

(( Right-Wing Hate Speech Ignored by Bill O'Reilly ))
O'Reilly claims there is no hate on the right, that it's all on the left. But the way he defines hate is ridiculous, if a liberal blog or website writes an article that criticizes George W. Bush (or any Republican) O'Reilly calls it hate. When it's not hate, it's reporting the facts, there is no hate. A great example is when websites like oreilly-sucks.com, mediamatters.org, etc. criticize O'Reilly he calls it hate, and says they are hate groups who lie about him.

That is a lie, it is not hate, and they are not hate websites. There is real hate on the internet, but O'Reilly does not report it, because most of it is from the right. I have documented this hate in my blog and on a web page, all of it was ignored by Bill O'Reilly, and it was never reported on the Factor.

Visit the web page below to see the massive right-wing hate O'Reilly has ignored:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/right-wing-hate.htm

O'Reilly Phone Sex Scandal Information
On October 13, 2004 FOX News producer Andrea Mackris filed a lawsuit against Bill O'Reilly.

In that lawsuit she claims he subjected her to repeated instances of sexual harassment and spoke often, and explicitly, to her about phone sex, vibrators, threesomes, masturbation, the loss of his virginity, and sexual fantasies.



After hearing of the lawsuit O'Reilly said it was all lies, that it was a shakedown for money, that he would fight it to the bitter end with no settlement, and that he would let the courts decide the matter. That was all before O'Reilly found out she had recorded his phone calls. Then Mr. I will fight her lies to the bitter end with no settlement, paid her $10 million dollars to settle the lawsuit, get the tapes, and shut her up. The out-of-court settlement came on the eve of a courtroom fight over audiotapes, reports CBS News Correspondent Kelly Cobiella.

The smokinggun.com has the entire 22 page lawsuit

www.oreilly-sucks.com Privacy Policy

Copyright 2001 - 2013


eXTReMe Tracker