Advertise Contact About This Web Site Donate To
Get started with the top online bitcoin casino and win real cash playing casino games.

As you already know by now that Oreilly sucks and is the biggest loser. Oreilly facts apart, many people spend their time on computers playing online poker real money games as a hobby including slots

If you are looking to buy prescription medications from Canada, then buy from a licensed Canadian pharmacy. is quickly becoming the #1 source for playing online casino games for real money. Check them out

Some of the most comprehensive mobile bingo reviews can be found here. Definitely no spin just honest reliable site reviews.

The number one place for mobile slots is this site, they offer lots of info and exclusive free spins.

O'Reilly Sucks
Blog Archives

January - 2016
February - 2016

January - 2015
February - 2015
March - 2015
April - 2015
May - 2015
June - 2015
July - 2015
August - 2015
September - 2015
October - 2015
November - 2015
December - 2015

January - 2014
February - 2014
March - 2014
April - 2014
May - 2014
June - 2014
July - 2014
August - 2014
September - 2014
October - 2014
November - 2014
December - 2014

Website Links

O'Reilly Info

The O'Reilly Iraq Apology Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Spins

Cable News Ratings

Read The Letter O'Reilly Had His Attorney Send me

O'Reilly Wins 2004 Misinformer of The Year Award

O'Reilly Death Penalty Lies

O'Reilly on Top 10 Conservative Idiot List 49 Times Since 2001

O'Reilly Calls Mexicans Wetbacks



O'Reilly #5 On Top 25 Right-Wing Journalist List

O'Reilly Factor Year In Review 2009

Factor Pollster Caught Writing GOP Policy Memo

What a Fair & Balanced O'Reilly Factor Would Look Like

Transcript: Bill O'Reilly v Jeremy Glick

Peabody Award Facts

Bill Clinton Enron News

Buzzflash Names O'Reilly Media Putz of The Week

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly & The Republican Party Are Both Corrupt

The Right-Wing Liberal Killer Story O'Reilly Ignored

The Facts About O'Reilly And GE Doing Business With Iran

How to Deal With an O'Reilly Factor Ambush Interview

Why FOX News Loves Juan Williams: The Strings And The Puppet

Progressive Eruptions
Rude Pundit
Prison Planet
Apocalypse Cafe
Fox News Boycott
Inebriated Discourse
Hannity Sucks
Glenn Beck Is An Idiot

The Factor Guest List Count

February 2016 (4 Shows) Republicans - 30 | Democrats - 4

The Factor Guest List Count Archives

Ratings: The O'Reilly Factor - Total Viewers

Monday - 2-1-16 -- O'Reilly - 4.076 - Election Special
Tuesday - 2-2-16 -- O'Reilly - 3.385 - Post Election Show
Wednesday - 2-3-16 -- O'Reilly - 3.364
Thursday - 2-4-16 -- O'Reilly - 3.364
Friday - 2-5-16 -- O'Reilly -

Weekly Factor Average -

The Cable News Ratings Archives

Oreilly is a polarizing figure and so is online gaming, especially at Begado Casino. There are advocates in Congress proposing a federal law, but Republican detractors. This, according to a supporter of Steve and, who runs a Begado Fan Blog. The conservative approach is to stick to legitimate gaming certifications and says Zachary Gleason.

The O'Reilly Sucks Blog

O'Reilly Admits The People At Fox Are Rooting For Republicans
By: Steve - February 6, 2016 - 11:50am

Chris Christie Calls Out A Fox & Friends Co-Host For "Rooting For Trump" On The Network

Bill O'Reilly: "I Don't Think That There's Any Surge For Any One Candidate On This Network"

And during the segment O'Reilly basically admitted the people at Fox are rooting for all the Republicans, not just Christie. O'Reilly also ignored the fact that he is rooting for his friend Trump, and helping him by putting him on his show at least once a week.

Partial transcript:

BILL O'REILLY (HOST): You are are running in single digits in all the polls in New Hampshire. You've spent a lot of time there. You got a lot of media attention. I think we've been fair to you at Fox, although you gave the Fox & Friends guys a little jazz the other day, you said they were rooting for Trump. Do you really believe the Fox & Friends guys are rooting for Trump?

CHRIS CHRISTIE: Now, listen, I think that Doocy gets me on the air and asks me, you know, four questions on Donald Trump. You know, should Donald Trump have a do-over in Iowa? You know, once you ask it the third time, you should get off it. So, you know me Bill, I've always been the kind of guy where I'll take a couple of questions that I think are kind of off the beaten trail--

O'REILLY: Yeah you're pretty straightforward, but you're dodging my question now. Do you think they're rooting for Trump in the mornings here?

CHRISTIE: I think Doocy might be rooting for Trump, yeah.

O'REILLY: I think Doocy got promised he's going to be the ambassador to a very warm country. I don't know, I mean. I watch the show -- but I don't think that there's any surge for any one candidate on this network. I think it's all over the place. I mean, we got people rooting for you, got people rooting for Trump, people rooting for Cruz, Rubio, whatever it may be.
Colin Powell Kills Bogus Fox/GOP Email Scandal About Hillary Clinton
By: Steve - February 6, 2016 - 11:30am

Here is the deal folks, this is something Bill O'Reilly will never tell you. A group of partisan Republicans in Congress retroactively classified some of Hillary Clinton's emails, they were not classified when she sent them, they were ruled to be classified after she sent them.

This was done to hurt her politically and to create a made up scandal to stop her from becoming the next President. The whole thing is a made up scandal by Republicans in the House who have the majority, and it is being promoted by all of Fox News, the Republican party, all of the right-wing media in print, radio, and tv, including Bill O'Reilly.

There is no scandal, it was created to hurt Hillary Politically, then Fox News took over reporting it non-stop as if it was a real scandal. And now we have even more proof, because they also retroactively classified some of the Republican Colin Powells emails, and the Republican Condi Rice's emails.

Now here is the difference, neither O'Reilly, the GOP, Fox News, or anyone on the right is calling for Powell and Rice to be prosecuted and put in jail for sending classified emails. They are silent, which proves they are totally biased right-wing hacks who have no credibility and can not be trusted to report the news in an impartial way.

Former Republican Sec. of State Colin Powell recently reacted to an NBC News report that the State Department is retroactively classifying his emails by calling for all of his emails to be released.

Powell said this, "I wish they would release them, so that a normal, air-breathing mammal would look at them and say, 'What's the issue?' They were unclassified at the time, and they are, in my judgment, still unclassified."

Clinton campaign manager John Podesta said in a statement, "This announcement about Secretary Powell's emails shows just how routine it is for government bureaucrats to go overboard when it comes to judging whether information is too sensitive for the public to see. Hillary Clinton agrees with her predecessor that his emails, like hers, are being inappropriately subjected to over-classification. She joins his call for these emails to be released so that the public can view the contents for itself."

The State Department’s bureaucratic retroactive classification of emails has gone beyond the bounds of common sense. Republicans love to use the reclassification of the emails as circumstantial proof that Clinton must have done something wrong.

Now that the State Department is classifying emails from the Bush administration, Republicans are in a bind. The idea that Clinton did something wrong has been dealt a death blow.

O'Reilly and the Republicans will use their favorite tactic of ignoring the Powell and Rice emails while talking about Clinton, but the idea that Hillary Clinton was illegally leaking classified information has been wounded now that the former Republican administration is also under scrutiny.

The Republican presidential candidates have been using the idea of Hillary Clinton ending up in jail as an applause line, but if Clinton should go to jail for her emails, Colin Powell and Condi Rice should be sharing a cell with her.

Republicans believe that the emails are their best chance of beating Clinton, but the scandal that they are hanging their hat on just went up in smoke.

And as of today, Bill O'Reilly has not said a word about it, or had Powell on his show to discuss it, and he never will, because he is a biased right-wing hack with no credibility. A real journalist would report this story, and have Powell on to discuss it.

O'Reilly Attacks CNN For Simply Doing Their Job
By: Steve - February 6, 2016 - 11:00am

To begin with, CNN did nothing wrong here and O'Reilly is lying to you when he says they did. They simply reported what the Carson campaign staff told them, and they even admit they told CNN what they reported. O'Reilly also admitted the Cruz campaign was wrong to do what they did, and said the staffers who told CNN what they did should be punished.

O'Reilly Attacks CNN, Says "Honest Reporting Is Becoming Almost Scarce"

O'Reilly also said this:

BILL O'REILLY (HOST): As we reported yesterday, while the caucus voting was underway in Iowa, a CNN reporter, Chris Moody tweeted misleading information about the Carson campaign. Almost immediately, the Cruz campaign used that information to tell Iowa voters that Carson may be withdrawing from the race. Dr. Carson believes that hurt his vote tally. Ted Cruz has apologized. CNN says it did nothing wrong.

Now, there is no question that CNN is responsible for the false report. But the Cruz campaign is also wrong, and Senator Cruz should take disciplinary action against some of his staff. However, that may not happen.

As far as CNN is concerned, it says it is standing behind its initial report, which is ludicrous. That news agency screwed up big time and apparently doesn't care.

Talking Points has said it many times, the state of American journalism is on the verge of collapse. Ideology has permeated hard news coverage and honest reporting is becoming almost scarce, especially in political circles. CNN should apologize. Ted Cruz should take some action. And this should never happen again.


And after saying "Ideology has permeated hard news coverage and honest reporting" it is not true that O'Reilly was hit by lightning for hypocrisy, because he is a dishonest journalist who has a right-wing ideology. In fact, O'Reilly is one of the most dishonest journalists in the country, so he has no right to complain about dishonest journalists.

Here are the facts: A CNN spokesperson defended the network's coverage to The Hill, saying its correspondent reported the information provided by the Carson campaign.

"Dr. Carson's staff informed CNN that he would return home to take a 'deep breath' before resuming his activities on the campaign trail. That information was reported accurately by CNN across TV and digital," the spokesperson said in an email.

One person at CNN who is an opinion analyst (just like O'Reilly is) speculated that what the Carson campaign told them means he is dropping out of the race. This does not give O'Reilly the right to blame it on all of CNN, especially when he said it's ok for opinion analysts like him to give opinions.

Carson himself even suggested that Cruz reprimand his campaign staff for fanning speculation during the Iowa caucus Monday that Carson was ending his campaign, which Cruz dismissed.

Earth to Bill O'Reilly, if someone on a campaign staff tells you something you report it, they call it journalism, something you know nothing about. Even if it hurts the Carson campaign, it is there job to report it. Unlike you, they did not hide the info like you would have to protect Carson, the people to blame are the Carson campaign staffers, and the Cruz campaign, not CNN.

The feuding escalated on Wednesday, with Carson holding a press conference in Washington, D.C., to bring attention to Cruz's tactics in Iowa. Cruz has said his staff circulated an initial CNN report to supporters saying Carson was taking a break from the campaign trail and wasn't going on to the next primary states of New Hampshire and South Carolina.

And his staff did not distribute a follow-up report clarifying that Carson was simply taking a brief break from the campaign trail and returning home to Florida, which his opponents have seized on to knock Cruz.

CNN anchor Brooke Baldwin on Wednesday defended her network on air after Cruz continued to reference the initial CNN report, where the network reported that Carson was taking a "break" from campaigning.

O'Reilly is a biased right-wing hack and he just used the report to slam CNN because he does not like them. Diverting the attention from what the Cruz campaign did, O'Reilly is helping Cruz and making a partisan attack on CNN. O'Reilly also never once reported about Cruz sending out the illegal mailers that looked like the state sent them out, he ignored that story too because he does not want to make Cruz look bad.

The only dishonest journalist in this story is Bill O'Reilly, and he knows it. He is trying to cover for the Cruz campaign by blaming it on CNN, notice that nobody else in America is doing that, except Bill O'Reilly. The real journalists are reporting the story as it happened, not making stuff up to do cheap attacks on people at CNN.

Note to Bill O'Reilly, you are not the journalism watchdog for America, just do your job and stop worrying about what the other real journalists are doing. You make a fool of yourself and prove you are a partisan hack by doing this, and it does no good, it's just a waste of time because nobody cares what you think about other journalists.

O'Reilly Says Trump Lost Iowa By Skipping The Fox Debate
By: Steve - February 6, 2016 - 10:00am

Then again, maybe the people of Iowa were just smart enough to not vote for Trump, maybe the people of Iowa just did not want Trump to win, did you ever think of that O'Reilly, you Trump loving moron.

O'Reilly: "It Was An Incredible Blunder" For Donald Trump To Not Attend Fox News Debate

O'Reilly Let Donald Trump Lie About The Unemployment Numbers
By: Steve - February 6, 2016 - 9:00am

Friday night Bill O'Reilly let the GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump push a phony conspiracy theory that unemployment rate is really 25 percent.

On February 5th, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) released its monthly "Employment Situation" summary for January 2016. The BLS reported that the economy created 151,000 jobs, and the unemployment rate fell to 4.9 percent -- its lowest point since February 2008.

So the biased Republican Bill O'Reilly invited Trump on the February edition of his show to respond to the report asking whether we should "give the president credit" for the low unemployment rate? While also not having any other guests to provide a counterpoint to what Trump was saying.

Trump claimed that "the real unemployment number is 25 percent, and probably higher than that." O'Reilly failed to push back on Trump's allegation simply stating, "Okay, so you're not going to give President Obama any credit for the 4.9."

And now the facts, the non-partisan website rated the Trump claim false. He has said this before, and he is saying it again, he was lying then and he is lying now. But neither time did O'Reilly correct the Trump lies, because he does not want to, he is also a Republican so he wants people to believe those lies because it will hurt Obama.

Here is what reported:

We have previously debunked the notion that the government somehow cooks the books when it calculates the unemployment rate. But is there a legitimate statistic that reaches as high as 25 percent?

As it happens, there are measures of unemployment beyond the familiar unemployment rate. However, none of the more expansive measures comes close to the level Trump suggests.

The most expansive statistic calculated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, called the U-6 rate, is sometimes offered as a more "complete" picture of joblessness. Currently, the U-6 rate of "labor underutilization" is 9.9 percent.

That's higher than the more familiar 4.9 percent unemployment rate, but it’s also well below the 25 percent Trump claimed.

So is there another credible way to calculate it? Maybe. For instance, U-6 doesn't count people who chose to take care of their kids full-time, went back to school or retired early to avoid having to compete for a job.

In January 2009, there were 80.5 million Americans 16 and over who were not in the labor force. Today, that number is slightly below 93 million. So the number not in the labor force has increased by about 12.5 million.

If you factor this number into the U-6 calculation (and subtract the "marginally attached" category to avoid double counting) you get a back-of-the-envelope rate of 13 percent.

But even this is almost certainly too high, since that would assume that every one of those 12.5 million Americans staying out of the workforce in the Obama years has done so because of the poor job market. In reality, we're in the midst of the first big wave of Baby Boom retirements, so a share of those 12.5 million likely reflect this historically large pool of retirees.

For the sake of argument, let's assume that half the additional increase in people out of the labor force comes from the Baby Boom retirement surge. That would mean the "new" unemployment rate -- perhaps we can call this new statistic "U-7" -- is about 13 percent.

Other guesstimates would produce slightly higher or lower percentages, but the important thing is that the numbers in this range are well short of the 25 percent Trump mentioned.

Getting the number up to 25 percent would require roping into the count people who are high-school and college students and people who are happily retired -- that is, people who technically aren't working, but who have no reason to be. And that's a bridge too far.

Our ruling

Trump said, "Our real unemployment is 25 percent. Don't believe the 4.9. Don't believe it."

Setting aside his paranoia about the federal government cooking the books, Trump is off-base even if you give him the maximum benefit of the doubt.

The highest official government statistic for under-employment is 9.9 percent -- which is less than half as high as Trump claims.

And if you make a quick and dirty attempt to expand the scope of this measurement to include other Americans left uncounted in the standard statistics, there's no plausible way to get it past 13 percent -- and even that's stretching it. That's well below the range Trump cited, so we rate the claim False.

Obama: Jobs Report Inconvenient for O'Reilly/GOP Doom and Despair Tour
By: Steve - February 5, 2016 - 11:55am

This is for the lying O'Reilly and the Republicans who keep lying that the economy is terrible, they are liars, because the economy is doing great. And anyone who says it is not can not be trusted, including Bill O'Reilly, who keeps saying the economy is in Chaos, when in reality it is doing great and getting better every quarter.

President Obama said the "durable" U.S. economy has continued to grow this year despite what Republican presidential candidates have been claiming on the campaign trail.

"I know that's still inconvenient for Republican stump speeches as their doom and despair tour plays in New Hampshire. I guess you cannot please everybody," Obama said.

Employers added 151,000 new jobs last month and the unemployment rate fell to 4.9 percent -- the first time the jobless rate has dipped below 5 percent since February 2008.

Obama Proposing More Spending on Job Training Programs.

Obama Expresses His Desire to 'Make College Affordable for Every American.

Speaking briefly to reporters today, Obama said the U.S. economy is the "strongest in the world."

"We should feel good about the progress we've made," he said, before noting that more can be done to boost the economy. Obama also compared the nation's economy to his gym workouts.

"If it's working, then we should be staying on that same path," he said, adding that he doesn't reach for a "big double-bacon cheeseburger" after a good workout at the gym.

Only Bill O'Reilly and the Republicans think 150,000 to 200,000 new jobs every month and a 4.9% unemployment rate is bad news and chaos, they are idiots and liars, and if this were happening under a Republican President they would be reporting how great it is every night.

Governor Urged To Quit After Emails Release On legionnaires Outbreak
By: Steve - February 5, 2016 - 11:50am

And btw folks, Bill O'Reilly has still not said one word about the Flint water crisis story, not a word. Now if you are a Republican or a Democrat, you hate O'Reilly or love him, dont you think the guy who has the #1 rated show in all of cable news should be reporting this big story. The Governor lied, he was to blame for kids and other people having poison in their water, he should not only be impeached, he should be put on trial.

And O'Reilly will not even mention the story, even though he claims to be an Independent with a no spin zone who is fair to everyone, give me a break, everyone in the media except for partisan right-wing hacks are reporting this story. Because it involves a Republican Governor and his viewers would send him hate mail if he reported on it.

This is the real story with O'Reilly, he is not reporting the story for 2 reasons. Because a Republican is involved, and because if he reported it his 90% right-wing viewers would flood him with hate mail for talking about it. O'Reilly could care less about the people, or the kids of Flint, all he cares about is covering for Republicans and reporting on news his far-right viewers like.

O'Reilly even claims to care about the kids, which is now just laughable. If he really cared about the kids he would be reporting this story, calling for the Governor to resign, and calling for the feds to step in and give Michigan the money to replace those lead filled water pipes right now. Instead, he ignores the entire story, proving he isnothing but a right-wing hack.

Here is the new story O'Reilly is ignoring:

High-ranking officials in Governor Rick Snyder's administration were aware of a surge in legionnaires disease potentially linked to Flint's water long before the Michigan governor reported the increase to the public last month, internal emails show.

After the release of the emails, the Michigan Democratic party called for Snyder to step down on Thursday. Republicans, on the other hand, were silent, so much for caring about the kids and justice.

When Snyder disclosed the spike in legionnaires cases on January 13th, he said he had learned about it just a couple of days earlier. But emails obtained by Progress Michigan through public-records requests show Snyder's own office was aware of the outbreak since last March. At the time, others in the administration were scrambling to respond to suggestions that bacteria in the city's new water source, the Flint river, could be the culprit.

Following the release of the emails on Thursday, the state Democratic party called for Snyder to resign, following weeks of increased criticism of the governor for the state's delayed response in addressing the crisis.

"There is a limit to how many times you can play dumb when it comes to events and actions that take place on your watch," said the Michigan Democratic party chairman, Brandon Dillon, in a statement. "Governor Snyder is attempting to employ this tactic again, claiming he wasn't told of the connection, made almost a year before he informed the public, between Flint's water and the legionella bacteria."

Hack O'Reilly Slams Daily Beast For Reporting The Truth About Beck
By: Steve - February 5, 2016 - 11:30am

Thursday night Bill O'Reilly slammed the Daily Beast for simply reporting the truth about Glenn Beck and his failing media empire. Notice he does not dispute any of their reporting, which is very telling, all he does is say because they used some anonymous sources you can not believe it. Ignoring the fact that what they reported has been proven to be true, with numerous sources, including the CEO who resigned, and others who were fired.

O'Reilly is pathetic, he just does not like someone reporting the truth about his good friend Glenn Beck, who is going through a rough time, so he attacks the guy who simply wrote the article. Everything he wrote has proven to be true, and Beck himself does not deny any of it, and yet, the biased idiot O'Reilly slams the Daily Beast writer for simply reporting the truth, just because he used a couple anonymous sources who still work there.

And btw, O'Reilly used his tip of the day segment to slam the Daily Beast and the writer Lloyd Grove (who O'Reilly hates), which was not a tip of the day. He did this so he would not have any guests on to discuss it, or to counter what he said. And that is not journalism, it's being a partisan hack trying to cover for a friend.

O'Reilly complains about anonymous sources, while he has been hyping the Clinton e-mail scandal, which is nothing but anonymous sources, so he does the very same thing. He also ignores the fact that Grove did use on the record sources in the article, so it was not all anonymous sources, as he admitted he did not even read the article after he saw the words anonymous sources. Which he has also complained about, saying if you do not read something or watch it, you can not slam it, then he does that very thing.

O'Reilly calls Grove a guttersnipe and garbage, and never once proves anything he wrote is wrong, no facts, just a biased and partisan attack on someone who reported the truth about his friend Glenn Beck. The guttersnipe and the garbage is Bill O'Reilly, who claims to only report the facts and never call anyone names, as he ignores all the facts and calls people guttersnipes.

One last thing, how do you fire an internet news service? Salon is also not a hate site, and if he does not like the news he gets from Google news, he will fire them too, haha, that is too funny, and O'Reilly is a total idiot.

Here is what the total hack O'Reilly said:

BILL O'REILLY (HOST): Finally tonight, The Factor tip of the day is a real danger if you're consuming news on the net. For example, I recently changed my news service from Yahoo to Google because Yahoo uses the hate website Salon in its news pages. That's unacceptable to me. Now, Google may do the same thing. If it does, I'll fire them.

I mean, this has reached critical mass. Let me give you an example. This week a vicious article about Glenn Beck came out on a website called The Daily Beast. It's written by guttersnipe Lloyd Grove, a despicable person. Let me just quote you from the article. Colleagues and underlings of Beck interviewed by The Daily Beast, on condition of anonymity. I stopped right there. Just garbage. Can't identify anyone on the record and you use cowards to trash another human being.

And here's the kicker, the editor of The Daily Beast, John Avlon, has written a book that trashes Beck. And nowhere is that mentioned in the article. Not acceptable. Blatantly dishonest. Factor tip of the day: walk away.

O'Reilly Claims 3rd Place Is The Winner In Iowa
By: Steve - February 5, 2016 - 11:00am

O'Reilly Joins The Media Declaring Third Place Iowa Finisher Marco Rubio The Winner Of Iowa Caucus

Earth to Bill O'Reilly, 3rd place is not winning, all it did was keep Rubio in the race, if he had come in less than 3rd he would be done, if he is not already. It's down to Trump and Cruz, and you know it. Rubio is too moderate to win the Republican primary, and you know it.

Partial Transcript:

BILL O'REILLY (HOST): Trump is still very strong in New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada, the three upcoming votes. The media of course despises Donald Trump, and will paint him as a loser if they can, but here on The Factor we are fair. And the truth is, Trump remains very formidable.

Senator Marco Rubio, the big winner in Iowa last night, his campaign is now very competitive and should remain so unless there's something about the Senator that the folks don't know. Remember, in New Hampshire the voters can vote for any party, so Rubio has a much wider audience than he had in Iowa. Summing up, Cruz, Trump, Rubio all viable.

Fox News Was Silent When George W. Bush Spoke At A Mosque
By: Steve - February 5, 2016 - 10:00am

President Obama recently visited a mosque to talk about religion and discrimination, and of course O'Reilly and his right-wing friends flipped out, even though they said nothing when the Republican George W. Bush did the very same thing.

GOP presidential candidate Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), cast Obama's suggestion that the United States discriminates against Muslims as Obama pitting Americans "against each other."

Others criticized Obama for the mosque he chose. And late Wednesday night, Donald Trump said perhaps Obama "feels comfortable there" -- a comment thick with innuendo from a man who championed conspiracy theories about Obama's birthplace.

"We have a lot of problems in this country, Greta," Trump said on Greta Van Susteren's Fox News show. "There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque."

Jeb Bush, on the other hand, argued it was a positive step. And as we've discussed before, his brother George W. Bush would likely agree. The elder Bush, after all, visited a mosque shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks with a message pretty similar to Obama's.

So why is something a Republican president did in 2001 suddenly divisive when a Democratic president does it 15 years later?

Because Republicans are idiots that want to use anything they can to slam Obama.

Rubio is free to enunciate why that is -- and it could definitely have something to do with Obama singling out Republicans in the speech and his refusal to say the words "radical Islam" (though Rubio didn't mention those things in his comments) -- but more broadly, Islam is simply something that gives an increasing number of Republicans heartburn.

A Pew poll in 2002 showed 47 percent of Republicans and independents who leaned Republican said either "most" or "half/some" Muslims are "anti-American." Today, that number is now 63 percent.

Just 3 in 10 Republicans say the number of anti-American Muslims is only "just a few" or "none." Think about that for a moment, and it's not hard to see why many Republicans rallied to Donald Trump's proposed ban on all Muslim immigrants.

Pew has a lot of other data showing GOP voters are significantly more suspicious of how violent a religion Islam is and are much more likely to say that politicians shouldn't be afraid of saying things that might be seen as critical of Islam.

But the chart above shows, better than just about anything else, how much more polarized we are on this issue. Call it the Trump Effect. Call it a symptom of how Americans now get their news and information. Call it a reaction to the rise of the Islamic State.

Whatever it is, it is much more pitched than it was even after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Bush's move at the time was seen as somewhat bold; in today's Republican Party -- and without the huge popularity Bush enjoyed in the days after 9/11 -- it's not a stretch to argue that it never would have happened.

It's a non-story to everyone but Republicans, and Bill O'Reilly, who did an entire segment on it on the Wednesday night Factor show.

Jeb Bush: Turn The Lights Back On And Please Clap For Me
By: Steve - February 4, 2016 - 11:30am

Wow, this is just sad. Not once but twice the lights went out on Mr. 3% Jeb Bush during a speech he was giving in New Hampshire. Then after a big long statement about how great a President he will be, there was silence while he waited for people to clap, so he had to beg them to clap by saying "please clap."

How bad are you when you spend $50 million dollars and your own supporters at your own rally will not even clap for you, about as bad as it gets, Bush is toast and he should get out of the race and stop making a fool of himself and the Bush name.

Struggling Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush was forced to politely ask a group of supporters to applaud for him on Wednesday after a rant about his ability to lead the country was met with complete silence.

Speaking at an event in Manchester, New Hampshire on Wednesday, Bush lashed out at GOP hopeful Donald Trump, and promised not to be a divisive president.

"My pledge to you, I will be a commander-in-chief that will have the back of the military," he said. "I won't trash talk, I won't be a divider-in-chief or an agitator-in-chief. I won't be out there blowharding, talking a big game without backing it up."

"I think the next president needs to be a lot quieter, but send a signal that we're prepared to act in the national security interest of this country," Bush added. "To get back in the business of creating a more peaceful world."

Bush paused, waiting for approval from the crowd. But instead, he was met with an awkward silence.

"Please clap," Bush said, looking demoralized. Then the crowd obliged.

The lights also went out two times, and I would say this, turn out the lights the party is over. Someone is sending Bush a message, that he is done and it's time to turn out the lights on your campaign.

In fact, I can not believe anyone is donating money to someone who is at 3%, I sure would not do it, and if I had donated, I would ask for a refund, because I am sure they were told Bush can win if he has the money. But it's clear he is toast, the Bush name was ruined by his brother George, and it looks to be a bad decision for Jeb to even run for President.

GOP Even Uses Dirty Tricks On Other Republicans
By: Steve - February 4, 2016 - 11:00am

Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson slammed an unnamed 2016 rival Monday night, saying a campaign had played dirty tricks on him by suggesting to voters shortly before the caucusing began that he had dropped out of the race.

"I was reasonably happy today until I discovered the dirty tricks that were going on and people spreading rumors that I had dropped out and that people should caucus for somebody else," said Carson, opening his concession speech at the Marriott hotel in West Des Moines.

"I mean do you think that's something that is acceptable?" he asked.

And btw, Bill O'Reilly does not report any of this stuff, but if a Democrat did something similar to this, he would lose his mind and report it every night for a week.

This is what Republicans do folks, in the last election the Republican party sent out official looking mailers (in key states) that told Democrats to vote on the wrong day. They also sent out mailers telling people to vote in the wrong place so their vote would not count, or give out the wrong address for the voting place so they could not find it. And nobody ever does anything to them, they do it over and over and never get punished for it.

Carson also said this: "We are in the process of collapsing from within... if we continue to accept deceit and dirty tricks and lies," Carson said. "And people who do that are still viable candidates for president of the United States and we accept it and that's the problem."

Bush Is So Bad 49 Million Only Got Him 3 Percent Of The Vote
By: Steve - February 4, 2016 - 10:00am

It's official, the Bush name is ruined. Jeb Bush has raised $100 million dollars and spent $50 million of it, and what did that get him, 3% of the vote. So he is done and should get out of the race now, his brother George ruined the BUsh name and no Bush will ever be a President again, thank God.

Jeb Bush's campaign and the super PAC supporting his presidential candidacy have far outspent all other 2016 competitors on advertising, exceeding the amount spent by all campaigns at this point in 2012 by $10 million.

Together, Bush and his Right to Rise super PAC have spent a combined $49 million on advertisements across the country.

Right to Rise reported raising $103 million last summer and has spent $47.5 million on ads. Bush’s official campaign, meanwhile, has spent $1.5 million. But combined, the former Florida governor's campaign and super PAC have doled out $23 million in New Hampshire and more than $10 million in Iowa.

Bush's ad spending nearly doubles that of the next biggest spender in the race: Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, whose allies have spent a combined $25.6 million in advertising -- $7.8 million in Iowa and $7.3 million in New Hampshire.

Bush is polling in fifth place in Iowa at 3% and sixth place in New Hampshire, according to the RealClearPolitics averages of state polls.

In contrast, Donald Trump -- who maintains a double-digit lead over his Republican rivals in the first national survey released this year -- has spent just $1.5 million on ads. Trump announced last week he would begin spending nearly $2 million a week in early states, such as Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina.

Trump Says Cruz Cheated To Win In Iowa
By: Steve - February 3, 2016 - 11:50am

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump on Wednesday accused rival Ted Cruz of stealing a victory in the Iowa caucuses and called for another vote or nullification of Cruz's win.

Trump, who finished second behind Cruz, lit up Twitter on Wednesday with a series of posts saying the outcome was tainted because the Cruz campaign had deliberately spread misinformation about Trump's stand on Obamacare and an erroneous report that Ben Carson was dropping out of the race.

"Ted Cruz didn't win Iowa, he stole it," Trump (@realDonaldTrump) tweeted. "That is why all of the polls were so wrong and why he got far more votes than anticipated. Bad!"

Twitter was buzzing Wednesday morning over Trump's accusations. Several social media users tweeted screengrabs of an alleged deleted tweet from Trump's official account, in which he said Cruz "illegally" stole the vote.

"Based on the fraud committed by Senator Ted Cruz during the Iowa caucus, either a new election should take place or Cruz results nullified," Trump wrote.

Ted Cruz Thanks Far-Right Loons For Iowa Victory Over Trump
By: Steve - February 3, 2016 - 11:30am

Cruz Praised Beck, Deace, Perkins, Dobson, And Robertson. Five of the most extreme far-right conservatives in America, who are so far out of the mainstream only a few people on the right agree with them.

Here is what Cruz said:

TED CRUZ (R-TX): And let me say our leadership team, our Iowa state chairman, Matt Shultz, what an extraordinary job. You have done organizing a grass roots army, and let me say to our Iowa state director, Brian English, what an amazing job Brian has done.

And to our national co-chairman, Bob Vander Plaats and Steve King, these men have become dear and trusted friends. They are warriors. They are men of principle. They stand and speak the truth. They stand to defend their values and let me tell you, these leaders, day after day, week after week, have been crawling under broken glass with knives between their teeth.

I'm grateful for the support, the early support of my friend Steve Deace. We're grateful for the over 150 pastors across the state of Iowa, who joined our team to energize people of faith. We're grateful to the state senators, to the state representatives, to the volunteer leaders in each of the 99 counties who stood up and said we will be heard and this will be decided by the grassroots.

And then, I am so grateful to national leaders, people like Dr. James Dobson, and Tony Perkins, and Phil Robertson, and Governor Rick Perry, and Glenn Beck. Leaders who have stood and led, bringing together and coalescing conservatives here in Iowa and all across the country.

Trump Mocked For Statement About Coming In Second
By: Steve - February 3, 2016 - 11:00am

A few years ago Trump said nobody remembers who came in second, saying you are a loser if you do not win. But now that he came in second in Iowa he claims to be honored to come in second.

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump was mocked for a quote he tweeted in 2013 about the futility of finishing second after he lost the Iowa caucuses to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).

"No one remembers who came in second." - Walter Hagen

-- Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 30, 2013

Multiple Twitter users retweeted Trump's quote following his second-place finish on Monday.

Cruz took about 28 percent of the vote in the Iowa caucuses, compared to Trump's 24 percent. In the billionaire's Iowa concession speech, he said he was "honored."

"When we started this journey there were 17 candidates and I was told by everybody, do not go to Iowa, you could never finish even in the top 10," Trump said.

"I said I have to do it. We finished second and I want to tell you something -- I'm honored. I'm really honored. And I want to congratulate Ted and all of the incredible candidates."

It just shows that Trump is a phony and a hypocrite, and a loser. He can not be trusted, and every day he is caught in a lie.

Iowa Sec. Of State Slams Cruz for Misleading Election Mailings
By: Steve - February 3, 2016 - 10:00am

And of course you never heard a word about this from Bill O'Reilly, because he is too busy lying for Cruz about Obamacare and jobs.

Iowa's Republican secretary of state called out Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz for misleading mailers the Cruz campaign sent to some Iowans last week.

Mailers labeled with the phrase "voting violation" were sent to some Iowa voters, according to a report from the Independent Journal. The mailers list a voting score for the recipients and some neighbors -- they call the scores "public record" -- and urge Iowans to caucus Monday to improve their scores.

The mailers also looked like official letters sent out by the State, when it was the Cruz campaign that sent them out. A spokeswoman for the Cruz campaign even confirmed that the mailers were sent by the campaign.

In a statement, Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate said he was shown one of the mailers and said the wording "misrepresents the role of my office, and worse, misrepresents Iowa election law."

"Accusing citizens of Iowa of a 'voting violation' based on Iowa caucus participation, or lack thereof, is false representation of an official act," Pate said. "There is no such thing as an election violation related to frequency of voting. Any insinuation or statement to the contrary is wrong, and I believe it is not in keeping in the spirit of the Iowa caucuses."

Cruz, who has often joked that mailers "make good kindling," later told reporters that he would not apologize for his campaign's efforts to bring out caucusgoers.

"I will apologize to nobody for using every tool we can to encourage Iowa voters to come out and vote. Iowa, as first in the nation, has an incredibly important role in deciding who the next commander-in-chief of this country will be. We are going to continue to use every tool we can to encourage the men and woman of Iowa to come out, to caucus on Monday night and to stand together as one," Cruz said in Sioux City.

Pate's criticism came as Cruz made five campaign stops in Iowa on Saturday.

Sanders Campaign: Iowa Lost 5% Of The Votes
By: Steve - February 2, 2016 - 11:55am

The intrigue around her so-called win continues to grow. On top of winning an incredible 6 out of 6 coin flips that handed Clinton 6 of Iowa's 99 precincts (more than 5% when Clinton won by less than 0.5%), the Sanders campaign now claims that Iowa Democrats lost 5% of Iowa votes.

The Iowa Democratic Party informed the campaigns of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders late Monday night that it has no results for 90 precincts across the state, which could account for as much as 5 percent of the total vote. And the party has asked the campaigns for help in getting a tally for those missing results.

"We are, right now, calling all our precinct captains on precincts where we have knowledge of what's missing, to report what we think happened there," a visibly irate Robert Becker, Sanders state director told Roll Call after Sanders speech at the Holiday Inn.

"They've asked the other campaigns to do the same thing. At the end of the day, there's probably going to be squabbles on it," he added.

But an Iowa Democratic Party official disputed Becker's characterization.

"We are currently getting results from our small number of outstanding precincts, and results continue to be reported on our public website," an Iowa Democratic Party official told Roll Call. "The reports of precincts without chairs are inaccurate. These outstanding precincts have chairs who we are in the process of contacting to get their results. It is inaccurate to report that these precincts did not have chairs."

Yeah, they had chairs, but a lot of them never showed up, and did not have the app to send in their votes. So when people showed up and there was no chairman, they went home, so a lot of votes were most likely not cast either.

There are some rumors that with such a slim margin of 0.2% between Clinton and Sanders that Sanders might ask for a recount.

NY Daily News Has Great Cover For Trump
By: Steve - February 2, 2016 - 11:50am

Cruz Stuns Trump And Wins In Iowa
By: Steve - February 2, 2016 - 11:30am

Republican Sen. Ted Cruz won the first state of the 2016 race -- putting the candidate in real contention for the nomination despite businessman Donald Trump's consistent support in national polls.

Cruz was at 27.7 percent with 91 percent of the Iowa precincts reporting, and Trump was at 24.4 percent.

"Let me first of all say, to God be the glory," Cruz said at his watch party at the Iowa State Fairgrounds. "Tonight is a victory for the grassroots. Tonight the state of Iowa has spoken. Iowa has sent notice."

Flanked by his wife Heidi Cruz and Iowa Rep. Steve King, who has been stumping with Cruz since November, Cruz said that though Americans have suffered through seven years of President Barack Obama, but "joy cometh in the morning."

Cruz's victory will likely be attributed to his superior ground game in the state, where caucus wins are dependent on making sure your supporters show up at the hours-long events.

Trump had been consistently leading in the Iowa polls, but the big question mark was whether his fame and name ID would actually translate to caucus-goers.

Monday's results set the stage for next Tuesday's New Hampshire primaries, where Trump has been blowing the rest of the field away. He's up by 21 percent according to the Real Clear Politics average, with 33 percent of the vote, compared to Cruz's 11 percent, Gov. John Kasich's 11 percent, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush's 10 percent and Rubio's 9.5 percent.

The question is how much Iowa's results will play into the New Hampshire vote.

Robert Gates: Republicans Grasp Of National Security At Child's Level
By: Steve - February 2, 2016 - 11:00am

Former defense secretary condemns media for failing to challenge presidential candidates on promises he believes are unaffordable, illegal or unconstitutional

Robert Gates, a Republican stalwart and former US defense secretary who served under eight presidents, has derided the party's election candidates for a grasp of national security issues that "would embarrass a middle schooler."

An ex-CIA director who first joined the White House under Richard Nixon, Gates joked that if frontrunner Donald Trump wins the presidency, he would emigrate to Canada. He condemned the media for failing to challenge candidates from both parties on promises he believes are unaffordable, illegal or unconstitutional.

"The level of dialogue on national security issues would embarrass a middle schooler," Gates said of the Republican contenders at a Politico Playbook event in Washington on Monday.

"People are out there making threats and promises that are totally unrealistic, totally unattainable. Either they really believe what they're saying or they're cynical and opportunistic and, in a way, you hope it's the latter, because God forbid they actually believe some of the things that they're saying."

And of course O'Reilly has not had him on his show to discuss it, or even reported what Gates said, proving once again that O'Reilly is a total right-wing stooge, no matter how many times he denies it, the facts show otherwise.

Gates is among Republican elders dismayed by the way this year's campaign is unfolding, with establishment figures such as Jeb Bush, whose father he served under as director of central intelligence, failing to gain traction against mavericks with unusual prescriptions for keeping America safe.

Ted Cruz National Security Plan Is A War Crime
By: Steve - February 2, 2016 - 10:00am

And of course neither Bill O'Reilly or anyone at Fox News is calling Cruz out for it, because they are as nuts as he is, and they support his war crimes plan. O'Reilly has even called for carpet bombing them himself, he said we should bomb everything, bridges, water plants, etc. which are all war crimes.

In Thursday night's GOP debate, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) repeated his promise to conduct carpet bombing in the Middle East to combat ISIS forces. Yet he did not acknowledge that carpet bombing is a war crime under the international Geneva Conventions.

The Fox News moderators challenged Cruz on his voting record not lining up with his tough talk on national security.

"You opposed giving President Obama authority to enforce his red line in Syria," they asked. "You have voted against the Defense Authorization Act for three years. How do you square your rhetoric with your record, sir?"

Instead of addressing the discrepancies in his voting record, Cruz defended his past promises of carpet bombing and saturation bombing parts of Iraq and Syria.

"We need to define the enemy, rebuild the military to defeat the enemy, and we need to be focused and lift the rules of engagement so we're not sending our fighting men and women into combat with their arms tied behind their back," he said.

The Geneva Conventions, which the U.S. joined decades ago along with nearly every other country in the world, explicitly forbids carpet bombing. "Area bombardments and other indiscriminate attacks are forbidden," the agreement reads.

"An indiscriminate attack affecting the civilian population or civilian objects and resulting in excessive loss of life, injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects is a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions."

When Cruz said Thursday that the U.S. should "lift the rules of engagement" in wartime, he did not explain whether that included rejecting the Geneva Conventions.

Cruz is also incorrect to cite the Gulf War as a positive example of carpet bombing. The U.S. used laser-guided precision bombing during that conflict, which "substantially reduced the accidental damage that would otherwise have befallen civilian buildings."

Even so, thousands of innocent civilians were killed.

Cruz, who is poised to win or take second place in the Iowa caucus, has previously offered incorrect information about carpet bombing.

Cruz is also not the first GOP candidate to advocate for a practice that violates international law. In December, Republican frontrunner Donald Trump called for the ability to assassinate the family members of terrorists. Such intentional killing of civilians would also be a war crime.

Fox News Totally Ignored Gun Issue At GOP Debate
By: Steve - February 1, 2016 - 11:00am

Leading up to the last GOP debate, Fox News noted that "gun control" was "the most searched issue last month" and that Americans "want to hear about gun control." But during the debate, the moderators failed to ask any questions about gun policy.

Fox News and Google sponsored a January 28 Republican primary debate featuring Jeb Bush, Ben Carson, Chris Christie, Ted Cruz, John Kasich, Rand Paul, and Marco Rubio. And not one gun policy question was asked.

In failing to ask a gun policy question, Fox News moderators missed an opportunity to ask the Republican field about why they oppose background checks for all gun sales even when the measure is overwhelmingly popular with Americans and most Republicans.

Due to its partnership with Google, Fox News was aware that Americans wanted to hear a question about gun policy. In a January 28 segment on Fox News program Happening Now about "what issues are most important" to voters, Fox News anchor Shannon Bream noted that according to Google Trends data, people "want to hear about gun control."

During Fox's January 28 undercard debate for candidates that failed to qualify for the main debate, moderator Martha MacCallum noted "according to Google, gun control is the most searched issue last month, making up nearly 80 percent of all the U.S. searches," before asking a question about how much funding the federal government should spend on building new mental health institutions.

So the #1 issue searched at Google was gun control, but nobody at Fox asked one question about it. They ignored the entire issue, even though Google was the sponsor of the debate and that is what the people wanted to hear about the most.

Michigan Officials Secretly Gave Bottled Water To State Employees
By: Steve - February 1, 2016 - 10:00am

And they did it a full year before they gave the residents of Flint bottled water. So they were drinking clean water at the same time they were telling the people the water was safe to drink, when they knew it was not safe, which is stunning, and O'Reilly is still ignoring this whole story.

The Michigan Department of Technology, Management & Budget decided to haul water coolers into the Flint state building in January of 2015 out of concern over the city's water quality, a year before bottled water was being made available to residents, according to documents obtained by Progress Michigan.

Flint switched its water source from Detroit to the Flint River in April 2014, which is now known to have caused lead to leach into the city's tap water. After two boil advisories were issued in August and September of 2014, the city sent residents a notice that the level of trihalomethanes (TTHMs), which can cause liver and kidney problems, had exceed federal limits, although they were told that it was still fine to use the water and no corrective actions needed to be taken.

But concerns raised over water quality were enough for officials in the state's capitol of Lansing to decide to give state employees bottled water from coolers, rather than from water fountains. Coolers were placed next to the fountains on each occupied floor, according to the documents, and were to be provided "as long as the public water does not meet treatment requirements."

So they knew the water was not safe to drink, and yet, they were saying the water was ok and telling them it was safe to drink.

It took researchers uncovering elevated levels of lead in children's bloodstreams for a lead advisory to finally be issued in September of 2015. Residents were told not to drink the water and a public health emergency was declared by the Genesee County Health Department in October, and Flint's mayor declared a state of emergency in December.

The National Guard was activated in January of this year to distribute water from five fire stations -- a full year after water was brought in for state employees out of concern over water quality.

Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder (R), whose administration made the decision to switch to the Flint River, has claimed he didn't know about the water problems until recently. But the plan to use that source was evaluated and rejected by the city's emergency manager in 2012, according to a deposition.

And while the purported reason for making the change in the first place was to save money while another pipeline was being built, leaked emails show that the city could have stayed with Detroit's water and saved the same amount of money anyway.

So Snyder should now not only be impeached, he should be prosecuted for knowingly letting the people of Flint drink and use water that had poison in it. This is ridiculous that something like this could happen in America, and it was done by a Republican, proving once again that you should never vote for any Republicans.

Hot Links

Conclusive Proof Bill O'Reilly Is Biased In Favor Of Republicans

O'Reilly Dishonest About Publishers Weekly Not Reviewing Killing Reagan

Bill O'Reilly Proves He Is A Lying Right-Wing Idiot Once Again

O'Reilly Wrong About The Constitution & Obama's Power

4 Fox Hosts Slam O'Reilly Over His Ebola Reporting

Historians & The Patton Family Rip O'Reilly's New Patton Book

Jon Stewart Slams Fox For Criticizing President While At War

Facts On The Economy Bill O'Reily Is Totally Ignoring

Under Bush O'Reilly & Fox News Did Not Blame Him For Beheadings

Study Finds Fox News Only Tells the Truth 18% of the Time

More Republican Corruption O'Reilly Has Ignored

Jon Stewart Destroys O'Reilly & Fox For Ferguson Shooting Bias

O'Reilly Caught Lying About ISIS Threat & Juan Williams

NY Times Charles Blow Says Bill O'Reilly Is The Race Hustler

Homeland Security Shows Gutfeld & Baker Are Liars

More Republican Corruption O'Reilly Has Ignored

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Cost Of Obamacare

Bill O'Reilly Is Lying To You About Obamacare

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Electic Car Company Success

The Most Annoying Celebs Who Should Go Away

Bias Alert: O'Reilly Spins Presidential Election Media Study

O'Reilly & Fox Still Ignoring GOP Voter Registration Fraud Story

Biased O'Reilly Tells Romney To Call Obama A Socialist

O'Reilly Slams Obama With Dishonest Tip Of The Day

O'Reilly & Brit Hume Spin And Lie For Mitt Romney

Fox Promotes Ridiculous Study Of Doctors & Obamacare

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media & Obama

Low Gas Prices Shut O'Reilly & The Repiblicans Up Fast

I Am Waiting For The O'Reilly Health Care Bill Apology

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About The Media

O'Reilly Ignores MRC Calling For Sharpton Firing

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Wrong On The Deficit

O'Reilly & Fox Lie That Obama To Blame For High Gas Prices

Scientist Group Slams Celebs Like Snooki & O'Reilly

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About America

O'Reilly & Ingraham Lied About Planned Parenthood (Again)

Fox Unemployment Chart Shows Their Right-Wing Bias

U.S. Troops Burn A Box Of O'Reilly's Books

Kelly & O'Reilly Make Up Another Green Energy Scandal

O'Reilly Ignoring All The Stock Market Increases

O'Reilly Flat Out LIED About The Debt Obama Added

O'Reilly Caught Doctoring Florida Mans E-Mail

O'Reilly Ignored Michele Bachmann Church Scandal

O'Reilly & Morris Lied About The Debt Polls

O'Reilly Hypocrisy On The West/Schultz Story

The Truth About Those Bush Tax Cuts

Number Of Tea Party Events Down 50 Percent

NWLC Says O'Reilly Statement Made Up & Offensive

Video Proof O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Hack

O'Reilly Gets It Totally Wrong On Norway Terrorist

Norway Terrorist Info O'Reilly Ignored

O'Reilly Ignoring Ensign/Coburn Hush Money Scandal

O'Reilly Calls Obama Health Care Waivers A Scam

O'Reilly Complains About Losing In His Own Poll

O'Reilly Ignores Republican Hypocrisy On Judicial Filibusters

O'Reilly Ignoring Republican Unpopularity

O'Reilly Tells GOP How To Beat Obama With Scare Tactics

O'Reilly & Fox Are Lying To You About The Debt

O'Reilly Spins The 2008 Presidential Media Study

Important Tax Information Bill O'Reilly Has Ignored

O'Reilly Ignored McCain Op-Ed On Bin Laden

O'Reilly Scrubs Website & Podcast Of False Obama Claims

O'Reilly Ignored DOJ Black Panther Report

O'Reilly Still Ignoring Wisconsin Judge's Order Story

O'Reilly Ignored Jobs & Unemployment Report

Fox News Town Hall Protester Hypocrisy & Double Standards

O'Reilly & Varney Speculate About Oil Prices

O'Reilly Spins The Quinnipiac Temperature Poll

O'Reilly Proves How Stupid He Is Again

How O'Reilly Puts Out Right-Wing Propaganda

Fox News Insider Admits They Make Things Up

Luntz Admits Fox Has Anti-Obama Focus Groups

Reagan SG Says Health Care Bill Constitutional

O'Reilly Ignores Gore Answer To His Question

O'Reilly Wonders How The Moon Got There

More Republican Hate & Racism O'Reilly Has Ignored

Another Poll O'Reilly Has Totally Ignored

O'Reilly Thinks We Are Still In A Recession

O'Reilly's Nazi Comment Defense Was Laughable

Fox News The Least Trusted Cable News Network

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media (Again)

O'Reilly Claims Estate Tax A Seizure Of Property

O'Reilly Called Bernie Sanders A Loon

Bloomberg Tax Cut Poll Proves O'Reilly Was Lying

O'Reilly Ignored Positive DADT Study & Story

O'Reilly & Fox Ignore Judge Being A 9-11 Truther

More Real News O'Reilly Has Ignored

More Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Ratings

O'Reilly Got The Ireland Economic Crisis Wrong

O'Reilly Ignored The Tom Delay Conviction Story

Women Of America: You Need To Read This

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly Is Dishonest & Crazy

O'Reilly Nazi Comparison Hypocrisy

O'Reilly Ignores New Poll While Promoting Paladino

Andrew Sullivan Called O'Reilly A Dishonest Propagandist

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Nevada RCP Senate Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Right-Wing Abortion Bomber Terrorism Story

Fox & O'Reilly Ignored Friday Pro-Mosque NY Rally

O'Reilly Busted For Health Insurance Premium Lies

Most Factor Gear Made in Vietnam And China

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

O'Reilly Busted For 1st Time Retraction Lie

The Bill O'Reilly Non-Apology Shirley Sherrod Apology

O'Reilly & The Right Are Racist Idiots

O'Reilly Ignored Tea Party Express Racism Story

O'Reilly Compares Gay People To Al-Qaeda

Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Rating Polls

O'Reilly Ignored Mark Kirk Military Award Lie Story

Where Are The Sedition Charges Now O'Reilly

O'Reilly Caught In A Massive Lie About Jail Time

O'Reilly Running Ads For Emergency Food Supply

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Tea Party Militia Links

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Gallup Tea Party Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Harris Poll Showing Republicans Are Stupid

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Health Reform Bill Tax

O'Reilly Caught Lying About NEJM Health Care Survey

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

The Truth About Ratings For News Shows

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Spin Doctor

O'Reilly Spinning Fox News Most Trusted Poll

Fox News Did Not Air Hope For Haiti Telethon

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Obama Terrorism Polls

O'Reilly Caught Lying About House Ethics Committee

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Increase

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Limbaugh Racism

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Religious Festival

O'Reilly Caught Red Handed Lying About CNN

O'Reilly Caught Violating Journalistic Standards Again

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The ACLU & Racial Profiling

More Proof O'Reilly & FOX News Do Not Tell The Truth

O'Reilly Called Bruce Springsteen Un-American & Un-Patriotic

The Bill O'Reilly Senate Torture Report Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Obama Approval Numbers

FOX News Caught Lying About Obama Budget

O'Reilly Busted For Helping GOP Smear Pelosi

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Obama Earmark Promise Report Proves O'Reilly Wrong About Homeless Vets

O'Reilly Places 7th in 2008 Wingnut of The Year Award

O'Reilly Denys Reality About Abstinence Only Programs

Proof The O'Reilly Factor is Biased Against Barack Obama
O'Reilly said he is a non-partisan Independent, who is fair to both sides, and that he has been fair to Barack Obama. To check that claim I did a 3 month study of the Factor, it started on August 1st, 2008, and ran until October 31st, 2008. I watched the Factor every night and counted the negative and positive comments for Obama and McCain.

Visit the web page I set up, and you will see the stunning bias from O'Reilly and his mostly Republican guests against Barack Obama. Then you will see there is no doubt Bill O'Reilly is a dishonest and biased Conservative. This study is conclusive proof that O'Reilly is in the tank for John McCain.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The 3 Month Factor Bias Study:

Proof O'Reilly Lied About The Balance on His Show
O'Reilly claims the factor is balanced, and that he personally makes sure every week he has an equal number of Republican and Democrat guests. This is a bold faced lie, and I can prove it. I put together a web page that shows the guest list from the factor for the last 2 weeks. Read it and you will see with your own eyes that Bill O'Reilly is lying when he says the factor is balanced.

And remember that we are 3 weeks before a major Presidential election, or the Republican bias numbers would be worse than it is normally. O'Reilly is actually having more Democrats on than he usually does, and the balance is still not even close. If we were not so close to an election it would be a lot worse.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The Lies About The Factor Balance:

O'Reilly Sucks Investigation: Dishonesty, Deception, And Bias By Bill O'Reilly
O'Reilly claims there are no Republicans or Conservative groups that rival George Soros. O'Reilly said the top three conservative tax-exempt foundations are totally dwarfed by Soros and the radical Ford Foundation. And that they have 15 times more the assets. George Soros net worth is $8.5 billion, the Ford Foundation has a net worth of $13 billion. But the seven billionaires who donate to Newt Gingrich and other right-wing causes have a combined net worth of $34.8 billion dollars.

Somehow O'Reilly claims that Soros and the Ford Foundation have 15 times more the assets than anyone on the right. When the seven billionaires alone who give money to Newt, have roughly $14 billion more than Soros and the Ford Foundation combined.

Visit the web page below to see the massive money O'Reilly has ignored from the right:

(( Right-Wing Hate Speech Ignored by Bill O'Reilly ))
O'Reilly claims there is no hate on the right, that it's all on the left. But the way he defines hate is ridiculous, if a liberal blog or website writes an article that criticizes George W. Bush (or any Republican) O'Reilly calls it hate. When it's not hate, it's reporting the facts, there is no hate. A great example is when websites like,, etc. criticize O'Reilly he calls it hate, and says they are hate groups who lie about him.

That is a lie, it is not hate, and they are not hate websites. There is real hate on the internet, but O'Reilly does not report it, because most of it is from the right. I have documented this hate in my blog and on a web page, all of it was ignored by Bill O'Reilly, and it was never reported on the Factor.

Visit the web page below to see the massive right-wing hate O'Reilly has ignored: Privacy Policy

Copyright 2001 - 2014

eXTReMe Tracker