"Bill O'Reilly is Full of Shit t-shirts"
|
Hey folks, it's Steve from oreilly-sucks.com. A friend of mine recently passed away in a car accident, and his wife is now a single mother with two kids. She can barely afford to pay the bills and what's worse is she does not have a computer. If anyone can donate a used (or new) computer to me, please contact me at oreillyspins@yahoo.com, and I will get it to her. |
| Advertise | Contact | About This Web Site | Webmaster Information |
January - 2009 February - 2009 March - 2009 April - 2009 May - 2009 June - 2009 January - 2008 February - 2008 March - 2008 April - 2008 May - 2008 June - 2008 July - 2008 August - 2008 September - 2008 October - 2008 November - 2008 December - 2008 March - 2007 April - 2007 May - 2007 June - 2007 July - 2007 August - 2007 September - 2007 October - 2007 November - 2007 December - 2007 2001-06 Blog Archives 2006-07 Blog Archives |
The Factor Guest List Count Archives
By: Steve - July 3, 2009 - 1:00pm There was no TPM, and the Republican Mike Huckabee filled in for O'Reilly. Huckabee had Newt Gingrich on to trash Obama and everything he is doing, from health care, to unemployment, to cap and trade, Gingrich hates everything Obama is doing and says it will ruing the country. But remember this folks, Gingrich and all the Republicans in Congress said the same thing back in 1993, when Bill Clinton put his agenda in place. Guess what, they were all wrong, and ove the next 8 years we had the biggest economic boom in the history of the country, and all those Republicans were just wrong. Of course it will be harder for Obama than it was for Clinton, and take longer, because Bush has the economy in such bad shape it will take years to fix it. And the Republicans have no alternative plans, their only plan is to just vote no on everything Obama does, and hope it dont work, so they can use it for political reasons. They are actually hoping Obama fails, so they can benefit politically. Yet you dont hear a word about that from O'Reilly, Gingrich, Ingraham, Crowley, Williams, Huckabee, Ham, Morris, or any of them on the Factor. They want the country to fail so they will get a political gain, now that's un-American, and yet O'Reilly never says a word about it. Then Huckabee had Dick Morris on to talk about the media coverage of Obama, and how they are getting tougher on him. Which may or may not be true, depending on who you ask, and his approval rating is still 63% at Gallup. Crazy Morris said Obama needs to add more doctors before he expands health care, but how does he do that, you cant make more people go through medical school and become doctors. So as usual Morris is an idiot, who is clearly not a medical expert. He is just a hooker toe sucking moron, who spins out right-wing propaganda to make money on it. Ad you right-wing suckers fall for his garbage hook line and sinker. Then Huckabee had the Republican (retired) Army General Anthony Tata, who explained the U.S. offensive in Afghanistan. He put out some right-wing spin on what we need to do in Afghanistan, and of course no Democrat General was on to counter what he said. It was just the usual one sided biased segment with 2 Republicans and no Democrats that we expect from O'Reilly and his fill in stooges. Then Huckabee did a segment on Michael Jackson, and the plans for his memorial service. Hey what happened to the media is over covering the story, Goldberg and Juan both agreed the media was reporting it too much last night. Then the very next night you have 2 segments about him on the Factor alone, can you spell hypocrisy. Later in the show Huckabee had a 2nd segment on Michael Jackson. So it's clear they do not practice what they preach. Then the best of is it legal, is that even possible, most of it is just tabloid crap, so it's a stretch to call any of it the best of anything. Basically it was old clips put together of Lis Wiehl and Megyn kelly, boring re-runs. Then some tabloid story about a pet python that got out of its cage and strangled a 2-year-old infant in Florida. Huckabee said the guy should not be prosecuted because it was his son, and that will haunt him the rest of his life, which is enough punishment. I bet O'Reilly would disagree, he would probably want to give the guy 10 years. Then Huckabee had the 2nd Michael Jackson segment with Billboard's Bill Werde, he asked about Michael Jackson's future earning power. The 2nd Jackson segment was added, even though the night before Goldberg and Williams complained that the media was over covering the story, and it was not journalism, what a bunch of hypocrites. If it's getting ratings they will cover it, to hell with the journalism value, it's all about the ratings, especially on the Factor, just admit it. They (O'Reilly, Goldberg, Williams, etc.) preach all this garbage about journalism and journalistic integrity, and complain that the rest of the media is over covering the Jackson story for ratings, or ignoring important stories for partisan reasons, then FOX and O'Reilly do the same damn thing. FOX and Greta are covering it non-stop, just as much or more, than anyone else. And O'Reilly reports on it every night too, sometimes doing 2 segments on it. They are all just a bunch of ratings whores, all of them, especially O'Reilly, and to hell with actual journalism. Basically they are just a bunch of right-wing clowns who shoot their mouth off about things the media is doing, when they are also doing the same damn things. Glenn Beck Proves His Ignorance & His Hypocrisy By: Steve - July 2, 2009 - 1:30pm I know this is oreilly-sucks.com, but since Glenn Beck is a regular on the Factor, I think it is ok to show what a giant right-wing idiot he is, and show people why you should never believe anything this moron says. Yesterday on his FOX News show, Beck was talking with the Republican Senator Jim DeMint, and he said the following: Beck: I will tell you that I -- we discussed this on the radio program earlier today, that, um, a lot of people are calling this, where was it? In the Washington Examiner today. That they -- that people are saying that "Cap and Trade" is "Cap and Traitor". They're actually -- people are starting to view people -- both Republicans and Democrat -- as traitors to the country. Which I think is over the top. That's a very specific definition.Beck is complaining about some Republicans calling it cap and traitor, instead of cap and trade, he said it's wrong, and over the top. Remember this is Glenn Beck saying that, on his tv show. What's funny is just 24 hours before he said that, Beck was running a reward poster on his show naming the eight Republicans who voted for the bill "Cap and Traitors." His guest, Kevin Mooney of the Washington Examiner, who called them "traitors" too. So one day he supports calling them cap and traitors, and even has the guy who wrote the article on his show to talk about it. Then the very next day he claims it is wrong and over the top to call them cap and traitors, when he had just done the same thing, the day before. He also had another O'Reilly favorite, Michael Scheuer on to talk about Illegal immigration. And this right-wing nut said we need Osama Bin Laden to blow up a nuclear bomb in America to make the Obama administration to get serious about National Security and protecting the border. This nut Scheuer is a Factor regular, and O'Reilly puts him on alone all the time to give him political analysis. On last night's Glenn Beck show, Beck had retired CIA veteran Michael Scheuer on to discuss guns, the Mexico border and Obama's plan to send unarmed volunteers to protect our borders. After about 6 minutes of meaningless chatter, the conversation took a dangerous turn. BECK: Do you really, honestly believe that we have come to a place to where those very senior people in the highest offices of the land...Congress and the White House really will not do the right thing in the end, that they won't see the error of their ways?Then Scheuer said this: SCHEUER: Only Osama can execute an attack which will force Americans to demand that their government protect them effectively, consistently and with as much violence as necessary as Beck nods in approval of Scheuer's comments.Now imagine if a Democrat said that while Bush was in office, O'Reilly and Beck would call for the FBI to cuff him and stuff him, and call the guy an America hating traitor. But when a Republican says it with a Democrat president, Beck agrees with him and takes the guy serious. They openly showcase their deranged opinions by suggesting an attack will HELP the country! So let me get this straight, Bin Laden will HELP the country by attacking it? And Scheuer claims this is not just one solution, but the best solution? So he is telling us that a terrorist can HELP America by killing thousands or millions more of our citizens? Are you kidding me? How come this guy is not at Gitmo? And this is the guy O'Reilly goes to on a regular basis for analysis of foreign and domestic political issues, Michael Scheuer is a regular on the Factor, and O'Reilly loves the guy. The Wednesday 7-1-09 O'Reilly/Williams Factor Review By: Steve - July 2, 2009 - 10:30am Juan Williams filled in for O'Reilly so there was no TPM. Juan made the Obama agenda the top story and had the White House Deputy Press Secretary Bill Burton on to discuss it. They talked about health care, cap and trade, etc. Juan sounded just like O'Reilly, he hammered Obama on every plan he has, and did not have one good thing to say about anything Obama plans to do. He asked a series of long questions to Burton with criticism of Obama in every question. Burton answered his right-wing spin questions, and it was pretty much just like O'Reilly was asking the questions. In fact, I would not be shocked to find out O'Reilly wrote the questions for him. Juan is the so-called Democrat on FOX but he sounded more like Newt Gingrich than he did a Democrat. All his questions were full of Obama criticism and right-wing spin, just as if O'Reilly or Crowley were there asking them. It was just like having O'Reilly there, with just a different person to ask the questions. I would bet O'Reilly wrote those questions for him, because they sounded exactly like the questions O'Reilly would spin out. So if you thought the Factor would be any different with Juan Williams hosting you would be wrong. It was no different than if O'Reilly had been there, except without all the screaming and yelling. Then Juan had the Barack & a Hard Place segment with Alan Colmes and Monica Crowley. Right off the bat Juan talked about the possible Obama health care plan that MIGHT include some taxes, Juan called Obama a hypocrite, when the plan is not even out yet, and we do not know if it will include any taxes or not. So how can he be a hypocrite if the plan is not even out yet, answer that Juan. Juan sounded just like O'Reilly, accusing Obama of being a hypocrite over something that has not even happened yet. Colmes pointed out that the plan is not out yet so you can not call him a hypocrite, so Juan goes to Crowley and of course she agreed with him and trashed Obama some more. It was just like watching O'Reilly, no difference at all. Juan also trashed Obama on the cap and trade plan, he spun out all this right-wing propaganda about what will happen if it passes, just like any other Republican would do. He used the GOP talking points on it, the lies about how much it will raise your taxes, and the lies about how you will have to green your house before you can sell it. It's all right-wing lies to drum up public opposition to the plan. Colmes pointed out the advantages and reported at the most over time it MIGHT cost a family $175.00 a year more by 2020, which is not much, if it happens at all. And the green your house crap before you can sell it is just right-wing propaganda. Juan spun it all out just like O'Reilly would do, and if he is a Democrat I'm Babe Ruth. After watching Juan spin out all this right-wing propaganda just as O'Reilly, Ingraham, or Crowley would have, I am no longer going to count him as a Democrat in the Factor guest list count. He has already admitted he is more conservative than liberal, and last night he confirmed that he is a Republican who pretends to be a Democrat on FOX. After what he did last night I can no longer count him as a Democrat, he is as much of a Republican as Crowley. In fact, he sounded just like her, and the two of them agree on almost everything. God job Juan, you just outed yourself, you might as well drop the Democrat label because you are a fraud, and we all know it now. Then Bernie Goldberg was on to talk Global Warming and the Michael Jackson media coverage. Goldberg spun out some right-wing garbage about the mainstream media not reporting the other side of the Global Warming debate, and said they were hypocrites. When at least they have the other side on once in a while, FOX is the hypocrite, because they rarely ever do any Global Warming reports, and when they do it's always with some anti Global Warming guy who is paid by the oil or gas companies. The vast majority of Global Warming experts say it's real, and worse than we thought. The only people who deny it are right-wing nuts who support the oil and gas companies, and take money from them. Goldberg said the Michael Jackson coverage is way too much, and for once I agree with him. The media gets a big story like this and beats it to death, they over report it for ratings. On this one we agree, too much Michael Jackson reporting. What's funny though is they complain about the media reporting it too much, when FOX is just as bad, if not worse than any of them. The Factor was even cancelled Thursday night to do non-stop MJ reporting, so they have no right to complain when they were just as guilty as everyone else. And of course neither Goldberg or Williams complained about the FOX over coverage of the Jackson story. Then Juan played some old re-runs of O'Reilly reality check garbage, and called it the best of reality checks. It was basically clips of O'Reilly doing those stupid reality checks that have no reality and no check, just O'Reilly's spin on what he calls reality. Then Juan (the fake Democrat) pulled another GOP talking points spin job on the Obama job approval poll numbers. He cited the biased right-wing Rasmussen poll that has Obama showing a slight drop in job approval numbers and claims it means trouble for Obama. There is 2 problems with that, Rasmussen has biased polls that are always lower for Obama than any other poll, and only biased Republicans cite his polls. And the Gallup poll has Obama at 63% job approval, which is the same as it was a month ago, so there has not been much of a drop. The fact that Juan used the Rasmussen poll, and only that one poll is just more proof that he is as much of a Republican as O'Reilly or Crowley. It's the very same thing O'Reilly does, he cherry picks one right-wing biased poll and claims it shows the Obama job approval numbers dropping. When all the other polls show no such drop, and they do not report what the other polls say. Having Williams host the show was pretty much the same as if Crowley or Ingraham had hosted it. In the last segment Juan reported on the Sanford affair with the Democrat Alicia Menendez. She said Sanford is a joke and he should resign, I agree. Then Juan pimped some Factor gear for Billy and the show was over. Juan Williams proved that he is a Republican, who can spin out the GOP talking points just as good as Ingraham or Crowley did when they hosted. I would compare him to Monica Crowley, it was just the same as watching her host the show. Except he is not as good to look at. The Tuesday 6-30-09 O'Reilly/Crowley Factor Review By: Steve - July 1, 2009 - 9:30am Monica Crowley was back again filling in for O'Reilly who is on vacation. She did not have a TPM, and went straight to the totally insane right-wing nut Glenn Beck. They talked about the Iraq security handover, and a little about Al Franken, very little, maybe 1 minute. The two of them praised Bush for making Iraq a Democratic country, and acted like it was a good thing. Ignoring the fact that the Iraq war was based on lies about WMD's that were never found, that it cost us about 1 Trillion dollars, and over 4,000 US troops died over those lies. They ignored all that, as good little Republican stooges always do. Not to mention we will not know if Iraq actually turns into a Democratic country for years, and who knows how long we will have troops there. The whole thing has been a disaster, yet these two morons acted like it was a big success, and Bush was right to start the war. When most experts say it was an un-needed war and a giant disaster. Then they talked about Al Franken, Beck said the people are crazy for making Al Franken a Senator. And that was about it, they spent a whole minute on the Franken story, now imagine how much time they would spend on it if Coleman had won. And btw, O'Reilly said if anyone has evidence FOX News is biased send it to him and he will report it. If you watched the news yesterday you had the evidence. When Franken had his press conference yesterday afternoon CNN covered it live, MSNBC covered live, FOX News, never covered it at all. I switched to FOX and they had Glenn Beck on with some other right-wing nut and they were talking about Mexico and illegal immigration. Not once did they cut away from the Beck show and cover any of the Franken press conference. There it is Billy, we have 3 cable news networks, 2 of them covered the Franken press conference, 1 did not, so there is the bias you asked for. I watched FOX News off and on all day, and they barely even mentioned that Franken won. Shep mentioned it for about 1 minute, about half way through his show, he had one guest to discuss it, a FOX News reporter. They just said Franken won and Coleman conceded, and that was it. The other 2 cable networks had full coverage of the Franken win, with actual guests and a real discussion of the story. FOX just said oh btw Franken won, then moved on to other news as fast as possible with no guests and pretty much no reporting on it. Monday night Crowley had a pretty balanced guest list, 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats. Then Tuesday night she pulled an O'Reilly, she had 7 Republican guests and 0 Democrats, none, zip, zero. It was all Republicans all the time. Including her, it was basically an hour long right-wing propaganda all spin zone. It was just like having O'Reilly there, except a Blonde right-winger was in his place. Beck got 2 segments, why? Glenn Beck is nuts, and I am serious. If you believe one word he says about anything you should be locked up for being stupid in public. Beck is a total 100% right-wing spin doctor, and virtually nothing he says is true. It's all his spin on an issue, and it's done to make Obama and the Democrats look bad. Even when he is caught lying he never does a correction, and denies he lied, just like O'Reilly does, they are like twin brothers. And if you believe anything this fool says I feel sorry for you. Crowley loaded the show with all Republicans, on the day Al Franken won 5 to 0 in the Minnesota Supreme Court. Not one Democrat was on the show to discuss the story, it was mentioned one time with Beck, he trashed Franken and all the people who voted for him, then they moved on to another story. If that's journalism I'm Kobe Bryant. It's called bias, and ignoring the journalism. The Factor is the #1 news show on cable, and they pretty much ignored the entire Franken story, even though it was the biggest news of the day. And yet O'Reilly says bias at FOX, what bias. Right there it is, open your eyes, your own show ignored the biggest news story of the day, and your own news network did not even cover the Franken press conference. That's bias Billy, ignoring a news story for partisan reasons is bias, you even said so yourself, then you do the same damn thing. And you call it a hard news show with a no spin zone. Which is just ridiculous, it's a soft news show, with all right-wing spin. Al Franken Wins (Suck on That O'Reilly) By: Steve - June 30, 2009 - 3:30pm The Minnesota Supreme Court unanimously ruled Al Franken the winner of last November's Senate race, putting the former "Saturday Night Live" star on the brink of becoming a United States senator and Democrats on the cusp of holding a dominant 60-vote supermajority in the Senate. In a unanimous 5-0 decision, the court upheld a three-judge panel's April 14 ruling that Franken defeated Republican Norm Coleman in the race by 312 votes out of 2.9 million cast. The 32-page ruling was remarkably decisive, picking apart and rejecting one Coleman legal claim after another. Asked for comment, O'Reilly said he demands a recount, lol. Then he cried like a baby because another liberal won a Senate seat, and it's number 60 which O'Reilly really hates. Newshounds Nail O'Reilly on His Sanford Bias & Hypocrisy By: Steve - June 30, 2009 - 11:30am The newshounds had a geat analysis of how O'Reilly ignored the real story about sanford, and used diversion tactics to spin the story and make it about the left and the so-called liberal media. Here is what they wrote: The O'Reilly Factor took a break from the nearly non-stop Michael Jackson coverage Friday night (6/26/09) accusing Democrats, liberals, and the left, of “celebrating” Gov. Mark Sanford’s (R-SC) fall from grace. Cleverly avoiding the substantive issues that surround Sanford’s admission that he’s been having an affair: his failure to arrange for someone else to be in charge while he was MIA, his hypocrisy as a supposed family values conservative, and his use of public funds to visit his mistress in Argentina, O’Reilly, Rove and Bernie Goldberg repeatedly smeared their fellow Americans who happen to be Democrats and then accused THEM of being vicious. It was hard not to see it as a deliberate diversion from the sorry state of affairs (pun intended) otherwise known as the Republican Party. Unless it was a deliberate diversion from the continuing outcry against O’Reilly’s persistent attacks on abortion doctor George Tiller, later gunned down by an anti-abortion extremist, about which O'Reilly is obviously still smarting (from the attacks on him, that is, not Tiller's death). With video. As soon as he heard the news of Sanford’s affair, O’Reilly said, “I knew some on the left would celebrate because the governor’s a conservative Republican.” O’Reilly generously acknowledged that “reveling in the pain of others” is not limited to liberals and Democrats “but the far left has been especially vicious lately.” I’ll bet dollars to doughnuts that “lately” means since Dr. Tiller was killed and the world started scrutinizing O’Reilly’s years-long campaign to destroy him. O’Reilly went on to make the laughable claim, “The right has been fairly restrained about the John Edwards situation... Here at Fox News we reported the Edwards affair but did not dwell on it. Or celebrate it.” That must depend on what the definition of “dwell” is. Because Hannity & Colmes, alone, spent one entire show on the subject (I didn’t see any of FNC's prime time shows spending that much time on Sanford who, unlike Edwards, is still in office). And O’Reilly, himself, while proclaiming that he did not “relish this,” used the occasion of Edwards' affair to air every other “very accurate” grievance O'Reilly had against Edwards and vowed to find out who sat on the story for several months. Funny, I didn’t see any such journalistic spunk over the unanswered questions related to the Sanford case. In fact, I have seen no journalistic spunk at all about Sanford's downfall. As an example of the left supposedly “celebrating” Sanford’s fall, O’Reilly played a clip of Democratic strategist Paul Begala saying, “I’m sick of getting lectures from Republicans that I’m not a good husband, I’m not a good Christian, I’m not a good patriot. They ought to cut that crap and do their real job and stop lecturing the rest of us about gay rights and sex...” Correct me if I’m wrong but I didn’t hear anything celebratory about Sanford’s troubles there. Begala didn’t even mention Sanford’s name. But maybe that came later. O’Reilly cut off the clip by saying, “Now, I could spend all night citing the nasty attacks by far-left loons.” That was followed by a swipe at Nancy Pelosi’s daughter, Christine Pelosi, who said, “How many more Sanfords until the GOP decides to drop the hopelessly hypocritical opposition to privacy rights and marriage equality?’ O’Reilly announced, “Privacy rights, of course, is code for unrestricted abortion.” According to O’Reilly, Pelosi’s game was “obvious.” “If you support any protections for the unborn or traditional marriage, you had better be a saint.” Maybe O’Reilly’s just worried that his own lack of sainthood will come under scrutiny next, maybe with regard to a little thing called a loofah. Or maybe he’s still smarting from the criticism over his own relentless attacks on Tiller. “Absolutely vicious. Absolutely un-American,” O’Reilly said. OK, so if Mr. Sensitive O’Reilly believes so much in civil discourse, why does he allow the kind of mean-spirited "jokes" that are Dennis Miller's stock in trade on The Factor? Better yet, why did he engage in attacks far more vicious attacks on Tiller, that continued even after he had been murdered? In the next segment, Karl Rove proved the point. But first, O’Reilly huffed that Pelosi and the Washington Post were “intimidating anyone who’s pro life, traditional marriage. You’d better not say a word if you are not a saint or we’re gonna get you.” Rove agreed, adding that it’s “a curious double standard.” Well, it takes one to know one, Karl. Because before the interview was even half over (at about the 4 minute mark in the video below), he was attacking the left. “The left will seize on any opportunity they think they have in order to condemn those who are pro life and pro traditional marriage.” Hmm, I don’t hear people on the left condemning Barack Obama for being pro traditional marriage nor condemning Senator Bob Casey for being pro life. Then, referring to Paul Begala, Rove asked superciliously, “Unbelievable! ...Who, exactly, is accusing him of being a poor father or a poor Christian or not a patriot?” “Nobody!” O’Reilly exclaimed. OK, maybe not a poor father but just a few nights ago on Hannity, Fox News fave (and two-time voter fraud suspect) Ann Coulter accused the left of hating America so much they think the rest of the world does, too. I don’t recall any outrage from either O’Reilly or Rove. And there certainly wasn’t any objection from Sean Hannity. As a matter of fact, on Monday, Coulter told O’Reilly that liberals are on “the pro-death side” and only in the “one case” of Dr. Tiller’s murder were they upset. She went on to say that she didn’t even like to think of Tiller’s death “as a murder." "It was terminating Tiller... I am personally opposed to shooting abortionists,” Coulter said. “But I don’t want to impose my moral values on others.” Was O’Reilly outraged? Hell no. He said mildly, “Naw, he was a murderer.” Coulter added, “(The left’s) logic is, if you don’t believe in abortions, don’t have an abortion. If you don’t believe in shooting abortionists, don’t shoot an abortionist. No, their logic is always for death.” She clarified that she was talking about “pro abortion liberals” which she described as, basically, the Democratic Party. Was O’Reilly outraged NOW? No. He complained that no Democrats had come out to support him, before adding that not many Republicans had, either. Still complaining about Begala (and, of course, suggesting he represented liberals in general), Rove said, “I mean, this sort of artificial victimhood.” O’Reilly added, “The gleefulness... that I saw on television, the absolute joy in the destruction of (Sanford) and his family, made me almost sick, Mr. Rove.” Well, O’Reilly, why don’t you watch some of Coulter’s attacks again and tell me that she’s not gleeful every time she utters one of her poisonous remarks which, by the way, are far more over the top than anything you cited from the left about Sanford. And, now that I think of it, it’s not just Coulter. Your own attacks on Dr. Tiller could well be described as gleeful or relished, as were your attacks on Ward Churchill, ACORN and even Think Progress blogger Amanda Terkel. The Monday 6-29-09 O'Reilly/Crowley Factor Review By: Steve - June 30, 2009 - 11:10am The TPM was called Madoff Gets The Max. It was done by the Republican loon Monica Crowley. Billy was gone so he had the far right nut job Monica Crowley fill in for him. Notice that all the Factor fill in anchors are REPUBLICANS, not once has O'Reilly ever had a DEMOCRAT or an INDEPENDENT fill in for him. Which tells you a lot about O'Reilly, it pretty much proves he is a Republican, despite his constant denials. She ran the show just like O'Reilly would have, all right-wing spin and propaganda, except with less yelling and screaming. So it was pretty much just like having O'Reilly there. I will say this, she did a lot better job of having a balanced guest list. Crowley had 6 Republicans, including herself, and 3 Democrats. Which is far better than O'Reilly usually does, his normal balances is 6 or 7 Republicans, to 1 or 2 Democrats, or 0 Democrats. O'Reilly is the one who claims he personally makes sure he has a balanced guest list every week, then he has the worst balance of anyone, and most, if not all the fill in anchors have more of a balance than he does. Even with that it's still a right-wing propaganda show, because all the anchors are right-wing nuts, and they control the topics discussed. That's why O'Reilly only uses right-wing fill in anchors, so they can do a right-wing propaganda show, just like he does. Which prove the claims from O'Reilly that he is a non-partisan Independent is a pathetic joke, and it's just laughable to even make such a claim. O'Reilly is as much of a right-winger as Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity, and it's just dishonest to claim you are an Independent, when 95% of your show is right-wing spin, and 95% of your positions on the issues are with the Republicans. Not to mention, the Factor is the #3 most conservative show in the media, behind only Rush and Hannity. This show was just the same as if O'Reilly had been there, the only difference was a right-wing woman hosted it, instead of a right-wing man. It was actually better than O'Reilly, but I'm sure the ratings were way down because they always are when Billy has a fill in. His far right viewers watch to see him yell and scream and make liberals look bad with his crazy far right propaganda. |
O'Reilly Caught Red Handed Lying About CNN O'Reilly Caught Violating Journalistic Standards Again O'Reilly Caught Lying About The ACLU & Racial Profiling More Proof O'Reilly & FOX News Do Not Tell The Truth Factor Pollster Caught Writing GOP Policy Memo O'Reilly Called Bruce Springsteen Un-American & Un-Patriotic The Bill O'Reilly Senate Torture Report Countdown Clock O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Obama Approval Numbers FOX News Caught Lying About Obama Budget O'Reilly Busted For Helping GOP Smear Pelosi O'Reilly Caught Lying About Obama Earmark Promise What a Fair & Balanced O'Reilly Factor Would Look Like Military.com Report Proves O'Reilly Wrong About Homeless Vets O'Reilly Places 7th in 2008 Wingnut of The Year Award O'Reilly Denys Reality About Abstinence Only Programs Conclusive Proof O'Reilly & The Republican Party Are Both Corrupt The Right-Wing Liberal Killer Story O'Reilly Ignored The Facts About O'Reilly And GE Doing Business With Iran How to Deal With an O'Reilly Factor Ambush Interview Buzzflash Names O'Reilly Media Putz of The Week The 10 Page Hand Written Lucifer Letter I Got in 2003 Why FOX News Loves Juan Williams: The Strings And The Puppet
O'Reilly Info O'Reilly Spins Cable News Ratings Read The Letter O'Reilly Had His Attorney Send me O'Reilly Caught Lying About The NY Times JFK Terror Plot O'Reilly's Party Enrollment Form Showing Him a Registered Republican O'Reilly Wins 2004 Misinformer of The Year Award O'Reilly Death Penalty Lies O'Reilly on Top 10 Conservative Idiot List 49 Times Since 2001 O'Reilly Calls Mexicans Wetbacks Mail-to-Bill Hate-Mail FOX News Bias Transcripts Assorted
Think Progress Buzzflash Bartcop AmericaBlog Crooks & Liars Progressive Eruptions Rude Pundit Moveon.org Truthout.com Unknown News Daily Beacon Mike Hersh Prison Planet Moose & Squirrel Freedom Toons Politics & Society Apocalypse Cafe Fox News Boycott I Hate Hannity Inebriated Discourse Hannity Sucks
mediamatters.org fair.org alternet.org cjr.org Media Transparency conwebwatch |
| The O'Reilly Sucks Forums |
 |
| Proof The O'Reilly Factor is Biased Against Barack Obama | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/3mbiasnumbers.htm |
| Proof O'Reilly Lied About The Balance on His Show | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreillybalanced.htm |
| O'Reilly Sucks Investigation: Dishonesty, Deception, And Bias By Bill O'Reilly | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreilly-investigation.htm |
| (( Right-Wing Hate Speech Ignored by Bill O'Reilly )) | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/right-wing-hate.htm |
| O'Reilly Phone Sex Scandal Information | ||
After hearing of the lawsuit O'Reilly said it was all lies, that it was a shakedown for money, that he would fight it to the bitter end with no settlement, and that he would let the courts decide the matter. That was all before O'Reilly found out she had recorded his phone calls. Then Mr. I will fight her lies to the bitter end with no settlement, paid her $10 million dollars to settle the lawsuit, get the tapes, and shut her up. The out-of-court settlement came on the eve of a courtroom fight over audiotapes, reports CBS News Correspondent Kelly Cobiella. |
