|
| Advertise | Contact | About This Web Site | Webmaster Information |
|
January - 2009 February - 2009 March - 2009 April - 2009 May - 2009 June - 2009 July - 2009 August - 2009 September - 2009 October - 2009 November - 2009 January - 2008 February - 2008 March - 2008 April - 2008 May - 2008 June - 2008 July - 2008 August - 2008 September - 2008 October - 2008 November - 2008 December - 2008 March - 2007 April - 2007 May - 2007 June - 2007 July - 2007 August - 2007 September - 2007 October - 2007 November - 2007 December - 2007 2001-06 Blog Archives 2006-07 Blog Archives |
The Factor Guest List Count Archives
Ratings: O'Reilly - Hannity - Beck - Total Viewers Monday - 11-16-09 -- O'Reilly - 3,507,000 Hannity - 2,298,000 Beck - 2,574,000 Tuesday - 11-17-09 -- O'Reilly - 3,741,000 Hannity - 2,678,000 Beck - 2,663,000 Wednesday - 11-18-09 -- O'Reilly - 3,868,000 Hannity - 4,200,000 - Palin Interview Beck - 2,512,000 Thursday - 11-19-09 -- O'Reilly - 4,120,000 - Palin Interview Hannity - 2,871,000 Beck - 2,730,000 Notice that Hannity beat O'Reilly in the Palin interview ratings, 4.2 to 4.1. Which surely made O'Reilly even more mad, because he was already mad that Fox News let Hannity interview Palin first. Word got out that Billy was pissed at Fox for letting Hannity have Palin first, when he has the #1 rated show, and now that Hannity beat him in the ratings you know Billy is really pissed now. Weekly Factor Average - 0,000,000
By: Steve - November 21, 2009 - 12:10pm As if you needed more proof O'Reilly and his conservative friends are total hypocrites with double standards, add Rudy Giuliani and Joe Scarborough to the list of conservative partisan hypocrites who cry about the KSM terrorism trial in New York. From Simon Maloy at Media Matters: On May 3, 2006, Bill O'Reilly led off his Fox News show with the sentencing of Zacarias Moussaoui, who was tried in civilian court and handed several consecutive life terms for his role in the September 11 terrorist attacks. According to O'Reilly: "The al Qaeda savage promptly thanked them by saying 'America, you lost. I won. But like what most of this degenerate says, he is wrong. Moussaoui is condemned to rot in his cell until he dies, and Moussaoui will be denied any and all privileges." O'Reilly explained that "by not executing Moussaoui, the U.S.A. shows the world we are a nation of laws, a nation that puts power in the hands of regular folks." Now fast-forward a few years -- the Democrats take control of the White House, and Obama announces he's bringing Khalid Shaikh Mohammed to New York to face trial before a civilian court. O'Reilly, who praised the civilian trial of Moussaoui, says of the decision to Bush White House adviser Karl Rove: O'REILLY: "Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, that is a terrible decision. Because you know, I know, and everybody knows it's going to cost the city of New York between $75 and $100 million. These animals are going to get up there. They're going to lie. The lawyers are going to turn it into an anti-Bush, anti-CIA, anti-American extravaganza."Just think about that for a moment -- O'Reilly, who praised the civilian prosecution of Moussaoui in 2006, while we had a Republican president, is complaining about the White House's civilian prosecution of Mohammed in 2009, when we have a Democratic president, to a person who was part of the White House that decided to prosecute Moussaoui in a civilian court. O'Reilly wasn't the only person to pull the ol' Moussaoui/Mohammed switcheroo on Fox News. Former New York mayor and 9-11 enthusiast Rudy Giuliani appeared on Neil Cavuto's show last Friday to attack the Mohammed decision as a "terrible, terrible mistake," explaining that terrorists "should be prosecuted in a military tribunal." Cavuto neglected to point out that in 2006, Giuliani said of the Moussaoui trial: "It does demonstrate that we can give people a fair trial, that we are exactly what we say we are. We are a nation of law." Indeed, confusion abounded among conservatives everywhere. Morning Joe namesake Joe Scarborough declared it "unprecedented" to try a terrorism suspect in the U.S. judicial system. To his credit, Scarborough later corrected this false assertion. No one expects conservatives to support President Obama, particularly on issues of national security. But is a little consistency too much to ask? Well, maybe consistency is too much -- how about something less than outright hypocrisy? --------------- Dream on Simon, O'Reilly and all these right-wing nuts hate Obama, so they are going to be massive hypocrites with double standards for the next 3 to 7 years, as long as Obama is in office. They are going to smear Obama for any little thing they can think of, even if Bush or another Republican did the very same thing, as in the bow to a foreign leader. And what makes it even worse is O'Reilly claims to be a nonpartisan independent, with a no spin zone, who has been fair to Obama. As he spends an hour a night, 5 days a week, having 95% Republican guests on to do non-stop attacks on everything Obama does. If that's being a nonpartisan independent with a no spin zone, I'm Elvis. It's ridiculous, and nothing but lies. The hypocrisy and the double standards from O'Reilly and all his right-wing guests are off the charts. And yet, O'Reilly calls that being fair to Obama. I guess in O'Reillyworld it is, but nobody else believes that, because it's not true. I am pretty sure O'Reilly knows exactly what he is doing, and that he knows he is a partisan right-wing hack, but if by some chance he does not know it, then he really is crazy, and he needs to get some medication. More Proof O'Reilly Is Biased On The Terror Trials By: Steve - November 21, 2009 - 10:20am Two Bush justice department officials say they support the terror trials in NY, a fact that O'Reilly has never mentioned. In fact, Billy has not had one Republican guest on the Factor, that supports the decision to put KSM and four other terrorists on trial in NY. Saying that critics are "understating the criminal justice system's capacities," two top Bush Justice officials came out in support of Attorney General Eric Holder's decision to try Khalid Sheik Mohammed and other Guantanamo detainees in federal court. Writing in the Washington Post, Jim Comey, former deputy attorney general and U.S. attorney in Manhattan, and Jack Goldsmith, a former assistant attorney general who now teaches at Harvard Law School, wrote that the move is "unlikely to make New York a bigger target" and that civilian courts are a proven venue for terror trials. Here is part of what they said: T]here is no question about the legitimacy of U.S. federal courts to incapacitate terrorists. Many of Holder's critics appear to have forgotten that the Bush administration used civilian courts to put away dozens of terrorists, including shoe bomber Richard Reid; al-Qaeda agent Jose Padilla; American Taliban John Walker Lindh; the Lackawanna Six; and Zacarias Moussaoui, who was prosecuted for the same conspiracy for which Mohammed is likely to be charged. Many of these terrorists are locked in a supermax prison in Colorado, never to be seen again.Comey and Goldsmith are hardly the first conservatives to support Holder's faith in the U.S. justice system. In a joint statement prepared by the Constitution Project, David Keene, founder of American Conservative Union, Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, and former representative and presidential candidate Bob Barr wrote this last Sunday: "We are confident that the government can preserve national security without resorting to sweeping and radical departures from an American constitutional tradition that has served us effectively for over two centuries. The scare-mongering about these issues should stop."And yet, O'Reilly does not report any of this, he just ignores it and pretends that only Democrats support the decision by AG Holder. It's bias, and dishonest journalism. Hey Billy, how come you do not mention this, or have any of those CONSERVATIVES on the Factor to discuss it. What say you? The Friday 11-20-09 O'Reilly/Palin Factor Review By: Steve - November 21, 2009 - 9:50am The TPM was called Fact Checking Sarah Palin. O'Reilly basically used the short TPM to cry about AP using 11 people to fact check the Palin book. O'Reilly said this: O'REILLY: Did you know that Associated Press, America's largest news wire service, used eleven reporters to check the accuracy of Sarah Palin's new book? Eleven! Barack Obama has had two best-selling books; the AP did not fact-check either one.So O'Reilly cries about AP bias in fact checking the Palin book, but not the Obama book, then he ignores everything they found, and never said a word about any of it. If they were biased in fact checking her book, and not the Obama book, he is biased too for ignoring what the AP found. The AP found 18 lies in the Palin book, guess how many O'Reilly talked about, zero, none. Yet he cries about the liberal bias at AP, when he was just as biased for ignoring what they found, and never reporting on it. Instead of reporting the 18 lies they found in the Palin book, he ignores it all and complains about the liberal bias at AP for not fact checking the Obama book. I agree that AP should have fact checked the Obama book once he ran for president, but that does not mean O'Reilly should ignore the 18 lies the AP found in the Palin book, which is exactly what he did. That's not objective nonpartisan journalism from a so-called independent, it's partisan bias, from O'Reilly. He's basically saying, I love Sarah Palin, and since the AP did not fact check the Obama book, I will not report on the 18 lies they found in the Palin book. So he ignored it all, and never said a word about any of it. What kind of a journalist does that, Bill O'Reilly the biased partisan Palin lover that's what kind. Then O'Reilly had part 2 of the Palin interview, and I will not cover everything, because it would put people to sleep, but I will cover a few things. Billy asked about her grade of Obama, she gave him a 4 out of 10. So clearly she does not like him, but she is a biased far right conservative so of course she is going to hate Obama. And why are we supposed to care what the stupid Sarah Palin thinks about Obama, her own approval rating is 23%, and 71% say she is not qualified to be the president, so why should anyone care what she thinks about anything. Basically O'Reilly asked the question so she could ramble on for 2 minutes trashing Obama, because Billy loves to have conservatives on his show to trash Obama. That was he gets Obama trashed, and he does not get his hands dirty, they basically do his dirty work for him. She more or less trashed Obama on everything, Afghanistan, health care, the economy, called him a socialist, etc. O'Reilly pointed out that she said McCain did not smear Obama enough with Reverend Wright, Billy said it was an amusing part of her book. Amusing? To smear a man who was running for president on what someone else said, that's not amusing, it's unfair and ridiculous, yet O'Reilly thought it was amusing, because he did it too. O'REILLY: One of the amusing points of your book for me was that you wanted to get Reverend Wright up there and ram it right down Barack Obama's throat. Why?The crazy Palin does not think that is negative campaigning, note to Palin, yes it is you idiot. That statement alone proves that she is a moron, and it proves that O'Reilly is a Palin ass kisser because he never said anything about it, when he knows it is negative campaigning. O'Reilly just let her spin out this nonsense with no follow ups, or any calling her out for her lame answers like he would have to a Democrat. Then Billy asked this tough hard hitting question, haha, not. O'REILLY: Let me be very bold and fresh again. Do you believe that you are smart enough, incisive enough, intellectual enough, to handle the most powerful job in the world?Basically she called president Obama a spineless elite Ivy Leaguer, and said she could be the president because she has common sense. Earth to Palin, you are a moron, and we want the president to be smart, unlike you and Bush who are not smart, we saw what happens when you elect a conservative dummy, aka George W. Bush, he ruins the country. You would be an even dumber and more conservative version of George W. Bush, and that is not what we want. Notice that O'Reilly said nothing after Palin gave her answer, he never mentioned any of her stupid statements, or her book lies, or anything. And btw, O'Reilly is a big religious guy, and yet he never said one word about Palin having the witch doctor give her a protection prayer, he just ignored it. Then O'Reilly asked her about Iran, Afghanistan, China, etc. She agreed with O'Reilly that we should do a naval blockade of Iran, which is insane, and even the far right Karl Rove said that would be stupid, and it would be considered an act of war. Not to mention gas would go to $5.00 a gallon, or more, and it would crash our economy. It's clear that O'Reilly has coached Palin, or someone did, she gave all the right answers and said exactly what O'Reilly wanted her to say. I am guessing she spent the last year being coached to answer all these questions, just like a movie actor preparing for a movie. It's all a scam by the right to make Palin look smart enough to be the president, and O'Reilly is in on it big time. Then O'Reilly actually had a Democrat on to talk about the Palin interview. Billy had the radio talk show host Leslie Marshall on to evaluate Sarah Palin's performance. Marshall said she would not give her a high grade because, in true politician form, she dodged almost every question O'Reilly asked her. Marshall also said he was not being specific with her answers. And that she dodged Iran, for example. And then of course O'Reilly attacked Marshall, he questioned whether she was criticizing Palin on ideological grounds. Billy said he did not get the feeling she was dodging anything, and said Marshall just did not like her answers. When Marshall was right, and of course O'Reilly did not feel she was dodging the questions, because he loves Palin, and has even said he thinks she is qualified to be the president. Proving he is biased for Palin, and that he can not be objective because he loves her. Then Geraldo was on to talk more about Fort Hood. Geraldo broke some big news about Hasan, he was visiting strip clubs, like who cares, and how is that news. Geraldo also said There will be a hearing in his hospital room to determine whether he should be held in pre-trial detention. He is conscious and he is paralyzed, and this is the beginning of what will be a very fascinating judicial saga that will ultimately result in his execution. Then O'Reilly had the crazy Glenn Beck on to talk about his insane 9/12 project, and the price of Gold. Beck explained the nine principles and twelve values, the things that we all experienced on 9/12. He said the idea is that to save ourselves, we have to reconnect, not with politicians or politics, but with values and principles. That you need to feel that you're not alone, reach out to each other and you will find other people who feel like you do. Beck also explained why he's become a gold bug. Beck said, "Gold is significantly over $1,000 an ounce because central banks around the world are selling dollars and buying gold. What do they know that we don't know? We've just hit $12 trillion in our national debt, and at some point the debt is unsustainable because the rest of the world is going to lose confidence in us." So Beck is basically saying we are doomed, so buy gold. And O'Reilly said nothing, because BOTH Beck and O'Reilly have gold companies that buy advertising on their tv shows. Not to mention if a Democrat had said we are doomed under Bush O'Reilly would have called him an un-American traitor. But Beck says it and Billy loved it. Then the dumbest things of the week garbage with Juliet Huddy and Greg Gutfeld. Huddy picked Bud Adams, owner of the Tennessee Titans football team. "The Titans were playing the Bills," Huddy said, "and Adams was up in his suite. He gave the fans a certain gesture and he was fined $250,000." Gutfeld singled out a TV spot that uses young children to endorse health care reform. O'Reilly picked the folks who took the audio of Bill's argumentative interview with Barney Frank and edited it into footage of two monkeys jabbering. And finally pinheads and patriots and the lame highly edited Factor e-mails. Billy hand picked some e-mails that said he did a great interview with Palin. And a couple that she he was too tough on her, wow are they stupid. The O'Reilly/Palin interview was a softball, not once did O'Reilly hammer Palin for the lies in her book, or the lying answers she gave him. It was a biased softball interview that made Palin look good, and if you can not see that you are a fool. O'Reilly/Palin Part One was A Joke By: Steve - November 20, 2009 - 12:10pm So that's what constitutes a tough interview in Billys world. An interview in which Billy hands her leading questions with the defensive answers and anti-mainstream bias already built in for her to elaborate on. And if Couric had been out to get Palin, I think she would have asked Palin tougher and more controversial "gotcha" questions than wondering about her choice of reading materials. Also, why the hell didn't Billy ask her about the claims from the McCain people and the fact checkers who are disputing so much of what she said in her book. A non cupcake interviewer would have asked her about these issues. There was opportunity in this interview for that line of questioning but Billy took a pass. Basically O'Reilly kissed her ass and tried to guide her through the interview. We'll see if he gets tougher in the next segments. But I have my doubts, I just saw a teaser for tonight's segment in which Billy gets really tough on Palin and asks her if she thinks she can do the job of President. Wow, I wonder how she will answer that one, haha. O'Reilly made an effort to have people believe this would be a tough interview, but he left some clues that showed what a sham it was. When he asked her what upset her most about the press treatment she received, notice how the news footage of Trig popped up instantly as she answered with her clearly prepared answer. Billy had prepared her for these questions and you could tell she was ready for them. The O'Reilly staff had the video to accompany her answers all cued up right at the same time she answered. That shows that it was planned out ahead of time, so they must have rehearsed it and got the video cues set up. At one point O'Reilly said this: O'REILLY: "It's fair to say that you were over-controlled by the McCain people."Someone correct me if I'm wrong here, but isn't he supposed to be asking questions, not stating the answers for her. Not to mention, the McCain people dispute what Palin is saying, yet O'Reilly implies it is a fact, and never mentions that they disagree with Palin. O'Reilly showed here what a Palin ass kisser he is when he said this, "You guys could have won the election, I think the press was against you, we all know that. Bush had a lot of trouble and that hurt the Republican ticket. But it was close." Close, on what planet, 51 to 49 is close, 52 to 48 is close, but Obama won 53% to 46%, with Obama getting 365 electoral votes to McCain's 173. If that's close, I'm Donald Trump. And there is no way any Republican was going to win after 8 years of Bush/Cheney, that is a fact. A monkey could have been the Democratic candidate for president and he would have beat McCain/Palin. What could have made it closer is if McCain had not picked Palin to be his VP, and actually picked someone who was qualified. Once he picked her it was clear Obama would win easily. But even if McCain had picked a qualified VP they would have still lost. The fact that O'Reilly thinks they could have won is just more proof what a right-wing idiot he is, because it was not close, and they had no chance to win. What is also clear is that O'Reilly loves Palin, and he is going to help her in these interviews as much as he can. It will get him good ratings, but it will not help Palin, because everyone can see these Fox News interviews are a fraud, they are planned out ahead of time and taped. I have no proof, but I would bet she was given the questions ahead of time so she could have prepared answers ready to go. And I would not be surprised if they filmed it like a movie, with rehearsals and 2nd or 3rd takes until she got it right. Notice that O'Reilly does not say the interview was not edited, or that she was not given the questions ahead of time, or that if she gave a bad answer she was not allowed to have a 2nd or 3rd take until she got it right. To me it looks like the whole thing is a scam to make Palin look smarter. Compare these interviews to how O'Reilly does an interview with Barney Frank, it's night and day. Palin does look a little smarter in these new interviews, but not much, and it's clear she has been coached up to be this good. It's all a fraud to make her look smart, and frankly I am offended by it. O'Reilly and his right-wing friends are trying to pull the wool over our eyes by propping her up and doing these rigged and taped interviews. The New Sarah Palin Book Is Free To $9.00 By: Steve - November 20, 2009 - 9:20am No doubt the new Sarah Palin book will be a bestseller, and conservatives like O'Reilly etc. will be bragging about how many books she has sold. But there is a lot of information they are not telling you, about the sales, and how it's getting on the bestseller listings. Many conservative groups, think tanks, magazines, websites etc. have bought her book in bulk, thousands at a time. This makes you think real people are walking into a book store and buying her book. When that is mostly not the case, in fact, the vast majority of her book sales are from conservative groups like newsmax.com, townhall.com, etc. Right now as I type this, you can go to magazine.townhall.com and get the Palin book free, with a 12 month subscription to their magazine. If you go to newsmaxstore.com you can also get the Palin book free, with a 12 month subscription to their magazine. They have bought thousands of copies of the Palin book to give away, and to get it on the bestseller listings. This is how Republicans get their books on the bestseller listings, they cheat. Not to mention, the Palin book was selling for $28.99, for one day. Now you can get it for $9.00 at amazon.com, and $8.98 at walmart. The book was not selling very well at $28.99 so they have already dropped the price to less than $9.00. Then last night the Jon Stewart show sent a staffer and a cameraman to a local book store, he asked if they had the new Sarah Palin book, they said yes. He said how many do you have, the man said 8, he said you mean 800 right, the man said no I mean 8, he also said they have not sold any, and that if they ever sell the 8 they have they do not plan to order any more. And yet Fox News is running fake video from a year old Palin campaign rally, where they imply big crowds were at Palin book signings. While they never report one word about the free book giveways from Newsmax or Townhall.com, or the discounted prices, or any of that information. And the great Bill O'Reilly is never going to report any of this, because they do the very same thing with his books. You can get an O'Reilly book for a dollar at the conservativebookclub.com when you become a member of their website. O'Reilly and all his dishonest friends at Fox News are going to make you think all the Palin book sales are the result of a real person walking into a book store and paying $28.99 to get her book. When it's all lies, yes she did sell a few books for real, but the vast majority of them were bought in bulk, for giveways, or they were bought for $9.00 or less, just one day after the book came out. And you will never hear a word of this from O'Reilly, or anyone at Fox News. The Thursday 11-19-09 O'Reilly/Palin Factor Review By: Steve - November 20, 2009 - 9:00am The TPM was called Sarah Palins Importance. It was about Sarah Palin and the first part of the three part interview O'Reilly will have with her, Thursday, Friday, and Monday. He is showing it in three parts to drag it out and get big ratings for three nights, as Hannity did last night. And btw, the interview is not live, it's taped, just as her interview with Hannity was. So they could edit out any Palin screw ups that made her look bad. Here is my question, if she can not even handle a live interview, how in the hell could she possibly be qualified to be the president. What say you Billy? Billy called it why Sarah Palin matters, proving once again that he is an in the tank for Palin right-wing partisan. Because nobody thinks Sarah Palin matters, except other right-wing stooges that like her. Billy called her a media star who matters, and thinks she could mount a serious run for president. There was not much of a TPM, he went right to the taped interview. Billy called it a serious policy interview. But it started out with him saying during the campaign she wanted to do the Factor, but the McCain people would not let her. She said it was water under the bridge, yet she talks about it constantly, and cried about it in the book. O'Reilly said why not go to the McCain people and tell them to not mismanage you, she said she did not want to burden them. Then O'Reilly told her they could have won, and it was close, which is a joke, they had no chance, and it was not close. Billy said her downfall was the Charlie Gibson Bush Doctrine question, and she called it a gotcha question. When it was not, and it was totally fair. Then he mentioned the Couric what newspapers do you read question, Billy said she blew it, and Palin admitted she did. O'Reilly asked Palin why she blew the Couric question, and Palin had no answer, she rambled on for 2 minutes with no answer that made no sense. Palin is just stupid, that's the answer. Palin thinks Couric was out to get her, my God she is an idiot. How is it out to get her by asking what newspapers she reads. Then after the commercial Palin was back to put out more right-wing spin. Billy said the book will be a huge bestseller despite the liberal media that hates her. O'Reilly asked her if she knew the liberal media would come after her so much. She said no, and Billy said she should have known. So far there has been no policy questions, all crap about what happened in the last election, and how the media attacked her. Palin called herself a normal American, whatever that means, and said they went after her because she is a normal American, and I say that is just garbage. Billy called her a threat, and said that is why they fear her, which is ridiculous, because nobody fears her. O'Reilly asked her what the worst personal attack was on her, and she said the attack on her disabled child. When it was not an attack on her child, it was an attack on her. Then O'Reilly asked her about the letterman jokes, and she said she did not like them. Where is the policy questions, none so far. And btw, Palin said she would not do the Letterman show. Billy asked her about Levi, not a policy question. So far the so-called tough interview is just fluff. Not one policy question, and it was over. The whole thing was just a free campaign ad for Palin, with pretty much no tough questions. Billy just let her spin out all her lies without calling her on any of it. And btw, here is some Palin information for O'Reilly. A CBS News poll taken 4 days ago on 11-15-09 asked if you think Palin should run for President in 2012, overall 66% said no, 26% said yes. Among Republicans it was 48% no, and 44% yes, so most Republicans do not even want her to run. For Democrats it was 83% no, 9% yes, and Independents were 62% no, 26% yes. And yet O'Reilly said she matters, to who, right-wing partisans that's who, but nobody else. The same poll has the Palin approval at 23% positive and 38% negative, which is about the same numbers Bush had when he left office. Yet O'Reilly loves her and thinks she would be a valid candidate for the White House in 2012, all I can say to that is give me some of what he is smoking, because that is crazy. Let's look at just how biased O'Reilly is for Sarah Palin. Nancy Pelosi has a 26% approval rating and O'Reilly says she should be voted out of office. But Sarah Palin is at 23% approval and he calls her a valid candidate for president in 2012, even after 71% of the people say she is not qualified. Now that's some big time bias, and a massive double standard. If Palin was a Democrat named Pelosi, O'Reilly would rip her to pieces and say she is an unqualified joke. But since she is a Republican and her name is Palin, he loves her and thinks she is qualified to be the president. Then the far right (biased partisan) Bernie Goldberg was on to do the analysis of the O'Reilly/Palin interview. Huh? That's like having an employee do an analysis of his boss, because Goldberg is a regular on the Factor, so O'Reilly is sort of his boss. How in the hell is that an objective and nonpartisan analysis, answer, it's not. Billy has Bernie on to kiss his ass and tell him what a great and so-called tough interview he did with Palin. And of course Goldberg had nothing but praise for O'Reilly, and told him what a great job he did. Bernie said she came off as likeable but he is not sure she came off as presidential. The whole thing was a joke, the interview and the biased analysis. Notice that O'Reilly did not have one Democrat on the show to talk about Palin, that's so he can protect her, he does not want any Democrats telling the truth about her. He only had Republicans on to talk about her because they love her, and Billy knows they will not be too hard on her, and not really tell the truth about her. The next segment was with the two Republican culture warriors, Alisyn Camerota and Gretchen Carlson. And of course no Democratic culture warriors, just Hoover and Camerota. They cried about the Palin Newsweek cover showing her in shorts. Carlson thinks they did it to sell magazines, but she does think it was sexist. Camerota said it was shameless and big time sexism. Then Billy cried about a big sexy billboard ad in NY City, he did not like it. Camerota had almost no problem with it, Carlson had a big problem with it. Then O'Reilly had the far right Laura Ingraham on to talk about the Obama health care bill. And of course she hates it, she hates everything Obama is doing. Because she is a biased partisan fool, so it's ridiculous to even have her on to answer a question you already know what her answer will be. And yet, that is exactly what O'Reilly does. He fills the show with right-wing partisans that agree with him. And btw, it will cost less than $900 Billion, it will have a public option, which O'Reilly predicted would never be in it. It also projects a $137 Billion deficit reduction, when O'Reilly said it would bankrupt the country. So he was pretty much wrong about all of it. Basically Ingraham is against it, what a shocker, not! At the end they trashed AARP for supporting the Obama health care plan. The last segment was the ridiculous (only a reality check in Billy's mind) reality check. Billy plays video of something a liberal said, then he gives you what he calls a reality check on what they said. In reality, it's nothing more than O'Reilly's right-wing spin on what they said, so there is no reality. And half of them have no check, O'Reilly just reports it with no reality check. Then the lame pinheads and patriots, and the highly edited Factor e-mails. And I only call it lame because usually O'Reilly names a Republican the patriot, and a Democrat the pinhead, so even that is biased. The fair thing to do would be to name a Republican patriot and pinhead each night, and a Democratic patriot and pinhead each night. But that would be fair, so O'Reilly does not do that. O'Reilly/Palin Interview (Part 1) Tonight By: Steve - November 19, 2009 - 11:50am Tonight is part 1 of the 3 part O'Reilly Palin interview, she was on Hannity last night and not once did he mention any of the lies in her book. In fact, the Hannity/Palin interview was softball city, as everyone expected it would be from a right-wing Palin lover. O'Reilly also loves Palin, as he has said many times. But he claims to be a nonpartisan independent journalist, so the question is, will he discuss any of the lies in her book, or ask her any tough questions with follow up questions. I am guessing no, he might ask her a couple semi-tough questions, but then he will probably not do any tough follow up questions, and he will probably just let her spin out her crazy answers. O'Reilly claims he did not do a cupcake Palin interview, last night he had a short preview of the interview and had the body language bimbo discuss it. O'Reilly played a short clip of his nearly hour-long interview with Palin, and the body language bimbo was on to analyze their body language. Of course, she did not say that the interview was a softball, but in so many words she said Billy was not very hard on her. O'REILLY: "Do you believe that you are smart enough, incisive enough, intellectual enough, to handle the most powerful job in the world?" PALIN: "I believe that I am, because I have common sense, and I believe the values that are reflective of so many other American values." Notice how O'Reilly worded the question, if Palin was a Democrat he would have said something like this. "Polls show that 71% of the people think you are not qualified to be the President, do you think you are qualified." And then if she said yes, he would follow up with "but the people say different, so how are they wrong," or something like that. But with Palin he simply asked her if she is qualified, and then let her answer with no follow up. Reiman said Billy was trying to make sure that this came across as an interview not an interrogation, thumbs are power digits, Reiman told O'Reilly. O'REILLY: "I tried to be very respectful to Sarah Palin, because so many people have given her a hard time and I didn't want to do that, but on the other hand I didn't want it to be a cupcake interview, and it wasn't." So there it is in black and white, Billy said it was not a cupcake interview. And we will find out later tonight if he was lying or not. I am guessing he was lying, and that it was a cupcake interview. I bet he does not grill her as he would any Democrat, and I will have a report on the interview here. O'Reilly Ignores All Bias At Fox News By: Steve - November 19, 2009 - 11:00am Every week O'Reilly does a weekdays with Bernie segment, he is Bernie (far right) Goldberg. O'Reilly has him on to do an entire segment (all alone) about media bias. But they never discuss any bias from anyone at Fox News, ever, not once. They only talk about what they call liberal bias at NBC, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, The NY Times, etc. They are basically the TV version of the biased Brent Bozell, and the ridiculous Media Research Center. They never find any conservative bias in the news, even though there are blogs and websites that document hundreds of examples of conservative media bias at Fox News every day. Billy and Bernie just ignore it all. Even after O'Reilly recently claimed there is no bias at Fox News, and O'Reilly even called for people to send him examples of any bias, then he will report it. I have sent him examples of bias at Fox for 8 years, I also e-mail it to his Producers, and not once has he reported any of it. Here are two more examples I e-mailed him about, and to this day O'Reilly has not said one word about it. Last week Hannity was caught using video footage from the 9-12 tea party protest where 75,000 people showed up, to claim it was the crowd at the Michelle Bachmann health care protest, where maybe 3,000 people showed up. Neither O'Reilly or Goldberg said a word about it, even though they do a weekly media bias segment, and even after Jon Stewart busted Hannity for it. Hannity even did an on air apology for using the bogus footage, but only after Stewart reported it on his show. Now imagine what Billy and Bernie would say if someone like Keith Olbermann at MSNBC was caught doing the same thing. They would do half a segment on it and call Olbermann a biased fraud, but Hannity does it and they say nothing. Then just yesterday Fox News was caught using bogus video footage again, this time to make it look like the crowds at Sarah Palin book signings were bigger than they actually were. Yesterday Gregg Jarrett proudly announced that Sarah Palin is "continuing to draw huge crowds while she's promoting her brand new book. Take a look at these pictures just coming into us." But the pictures that they chose to display on-air wasthe old file footage of Palin rallies from the 2008 presidential campaign. Individuals in the crowd are seen holding McCain/Palin signs, and others are holding pom-poms and cheering wildly. "There's a crowd of folks," an enthused Jarrett observed, as the Fox News Network aired the old footage. O'Reilly and Bernie said nothing, not a word. They have never discussed any bias at Fox News, not one time. Making the weekly Factor media bias segment, with the one sided biased right-wing Bernie Goldberg, a joke, a sham, and a total fraud. There is no Democratic media bias analyst to be on with Goldberg, and they never discuss any right-wing bias in the media. And yet O'Reilly claims it is an honest and objective segment, and that he tells you the truth. When the reality is, it's just a one sided biased right-wing propaganda segment, where they only discuss what they have decided is liberal bias in the media. While all conservative media bias is ignored and never mentioned, even after O'Reilly said he will report it if people send him examples of right-wing bias, it never happens. The Wednesday 11-18-09 O'Reilly Factor Review By: Steve - November 19, 2009 - 9:00am The TPM was called Tough Times For Mr. Obama. Billy said it's been a rough month for President Obama, then he said Obama is gonna have it even more rough when he gets back from Asia. Billy hammered Obama on the abortion issue in the health care bill, and cited the Constitution, the same Constitution he said he does not care about the other night. So he cites it when he wants to, as he claims he does not care about it. Billy hammered Obama for the NY terrorism trials, and said he needs to wise up. Then he pulled his he has been fair to Obama lies. Then the crazy far right nut Dick Morris was on to talk politics, and basically smear and trash Obama. And of course no Democrat was on to provide any balance. Morris put out some crazy right-wing spin on the abortion issue, and the NY terrorism trials. Morris said Obama wants a circus trial, because it will make Bush look bad. Billy said he does not believe it, when he is saying the same damn thing. Billy said Morris is calling Obama an idiot, and Morris said he is a smart guy, but he's making mistakes, yeah according to Morris. Morris predicted the health care bill will not pass, because the House will not pass the Senate bill, and the Senate will not pass the House bill. Which is ridiculous, because the two bills will be merged together into one bill in the committee. Then the crazy Morris said Obama is not running the country as the President of America, he is running it as the President of the world. Which is also ridiculous, Morris just makes this crap up and hopes someone believes it. Okay now get this, Billy claims Obama is screwing up on purpose because he only wants to be the President for four years, wow, hey Billy what happened to the no speculation zone. What a load of right-wing garbage, it's all fantasy land nonsense, and total speculation from two right-wing idiots. It's Glenn Beck land garbage. Then O'Reilly hammered Sally Quinn for saying Palin uses religion too much. He had Quinn on to talk about it. She talked about the Palin book and said it's a lot of revenge on the people who complained about her in the past. Billy did not want to talk about that so he brought it back to religion. Then O'Reilly said he does not see anything wrong with Palin talking about religion. Quinn said she uses religion too much, and O'Reilly said she was going off the rails. It was basically O'Reilly defending Palin again, and her religious views. While at the same time he attacked someone who wrote some negative things about Palins religious views. And once again you have O'Reilly, who claims to be a nonpartisan independent, defending everything Palin does. Then Karl Rove was on to talk about the AG Eric Holder being grilled about the NY terrorism trials at a Congressional hearing. Billy claims all the polls say the American people are opposed to having the terrorism trials in a federal court in NY, but those people probably do not know the laws. ANd we have already tried 195 terrorists in the federal courts. And of course Rove trashed Obama and Holder, Billy said Holder looked like a 3rd grader at the hearing today. What a shocker, two Republicans who hate Obama and do not want the trial to expose the torture by Bush are opposed to it. Rove also trashed the health care bill, as he always does. The entire segment was another one sided biased right-wing propaganda segment. It's O'Reilly and Rove trashing everything Obama does, with no Democrat anywhere to give the counterpoint or provide any balance. Not one Democrat was on the entire show to defend Obama or anything he is doing, not one. And this is called fair and balanced, haha, what a fricking joke. It's all Republicans smearing Obama all the time. Where are the Democrats O'Reilly? Billy said the KSM thing is mind-boggling, then he said he will continue to cover the President fairly, huh? O'Reilly needs to seek mental help fast, if he think he covers the president fairly he is insane. How is having Dick Morris, Karl Rove, and Dennis Miller on to trash and smear Obama covering him fairly? Billy has lost his mind. The next segment was O'Reilly and the body language bimbo, and I refuse to report on this tabloid garbage. Then Dennis Miller was on to do his usual lame jokes about liberals like Pelosi and Barney Frank, and I also refuse to report on what he says because nobody cares but O'Reilly and his right-wing viewers. Miller said Obama has lost him with the KSM trial in NY, ummmm, who fricking cares if they lost Dennis Miller, what a moron. I'm sure the Obama administration cares that they have lost Dennis Miller, NOT! O'Reilly told Miller that Sarah Palin was the poster girl for regular people, wow is he fricking insane. Sarah Palin is the poster girl for far right nuts, not regular people, the regular people are opposed to Palin, and the polls show it. Billy had a short preview of his Palin interview, that was taped btw, and not live. O'Reilly asked Palin if she thinks she is qualified to be the president, and she said yes. Wow is she stupid, and her answer proves it. Because nobody else thinks she is, and 71% say she is not qualified. The fact that she thinks she is smart enough to be president, proves how crazy she is, because she is a dope. Notice that all the Palin interviews on Fox are on tape, none of them are live. That is so they can edit out anything that makes her look bad, so if she can not even handle a live media interview, how in the hell could she handle being the fricking president. What say you Billy? Then O'Reilly had Cheech and Chong on to talk about the legalization of marijuana. Billy said it should not be legal, and they said it should. Then he spent 4 minutes arguing with them using his crazy right-wing spin, and they were not buying it. Billy said if you make it legal more people will smoke it and more kids will get it. WRONG, WRONG, WRONG. That statement proves that O'Reilly is an idiot, because anyone who wants to smoke pot is already smoking it. The kids can already get it, as long as you have money. Legal or not, they get it now, so having it illegal is meaningless. The drug war started 30 years ago and you can get more drugs now then you could back then. Billy pulled the kid card and said some people get the pot and sell it to kids to buy harder drugs. Which may be true in 1 out of 100,000 cases, if that, most people who smoke pot buy it to smoke it. And if a kid wants some pot he will get it, all he has to do is have the money, so the O'Reilly kid argument is weak. Then the usual pinheads and patriots garbage, and the lame highly edited Factor e-mails. Billy Wins Silver & Gold In Worlds Worst Persons By: Steve - November 18, 2009 - 1:00pm Last night Keith Olbermann did not just name O'Reilly worst person in the world, he gave him the silver and the gold.  Olbermann slammed Bill-O The Clown, over his recent legal debate with Judge Andrew Napolitano, in which O'Reilly said, "I don't care about the constitution" and called Napolitano a "pinhead" when he invoked it. Next, Olbermann slammed "Bill-O The Fraud," giving him the "Worst" crown over comments so irrational even the far right Glenn Beck had to disagree with them. On Beck's radio program, O'Reilly predicted a "tax revolt" and said, "I think people, when they figure out how badly they're going to get hurt in the next few years, there's going to be a tea party on taxes and it's gonna get nasty. Nancy Pelosi's going to be bobbing up and down in Boston Harbor." "I don't think that's necessary," Beck responded. OLBERMANN: "If anybody else had said what O'Reilly had said about the Constitution and about, say, Speaker Hastert, O'Reilly would have called for their arrest!" Olbermann said, calling O'Reilly a fraud. O'Reilly Busted For Using Biased MRC Media Study By: Steve - November 18, 2009 - 11:20am Once again the biased right-wing Bill O'Reilly used a biased and flawed media study from the Media Research Center, to claim the media has an unbalanced and unfair bias towards Sarah Palin. The study was done by the Culture & Media Institute, which is owned by the Media Research Center. L. Brent Bozell is the President, and they only find liberal bias in the news, while ignoring all the conservative bias. Bozell is a Fox News regular, and a big time Conservative, he has even stated that Fox News is the only fair and balanced news network in America. Bozell and the MRC are a joke, and the laughing stock of media bias reporting. They are biased to the right big time, and nobody takes them serious except for other conservatives like Limbaugh, Hannity, and O'Reilly. Tuesday night O'Reilly referenced a 2008 report by the Media Research Center's Culture & Media Institute, which claims that out of 69 stories on network news about Sarah Palin in the two-week period examined, 37 were negative, 30 were neutral and only two were positive. O'Reilly further complained, citing the report: O'REILLY: "Twenty-one of the stories portrayed Sarah Palin as unintelligent and unqualified. Eight stories used clips from Saturday Night Live to ridicule her." O'Reilly added: "Is that kind of presentation an accident? No."This so-called media study is biased and flawed, and I will point out why. 1) The report's scope was carefully limited to only the big three broadcast news networks, meaning they did not include the reporting on Palin during that time from Fox News, that was almost all positive. Making the study a biased Joke, not to mention they did not include CNN or MSNBC either. O'Reilly did not mention any of that information. 2) The so-called study only covered "the two weeks beginning September 29 and ending October 12," thus avoiding the period immediately following Palin's nomination and Republican National Convention speech, when news coverage of her was almost all positive. So when all the positive reporting on Palin started they ended their study. This was done on purpose to make the media coverage of her look as bad as possible. Making it a biased and flawed joke of a study, yet O'Reilly used it anyway. 3) The report conflated negative coverage with bias, scoring stories by negative, positive and neutral, then deciding that the network that ran the most negative stories versus neutral or positive ones was the "most biased." Despite suggesting that the negative stories were not factual or fair, no evidence is offered to support it. The report's basic premise is that all news about Palin must be balanced or positive, whether or not the facts call for it. 4) So when a media outlet reported that Palin did poorly in the Katie Couric interview, which is a fact, the MRC study counted that as negative bias against Palin, when it was simply reporting the facts. Because she did poorly in the Couric interview, she could not even name a newspaper she read, and said because you can see Russia from Alaska it gives her foreign policy experience. O'Reilly never mentioned any of that. 5) The report complained that "Most observers agree that Palin did not perform well in the Katie Couric interview, that the network coverage dwelled on the worst moments, making Palin look as unprepared and inexperienced as possible." After noting the focus on Palin's refusal to give a straight answer to Couric's question about what magazines and newspapers she read. But the report does not mention the fact that Palin could have avoided that kind of focus by simply giving a straight answer to the question. This is a biased right-wing media study that simply can not be taken seriously, and must be seen through the MRC's pro-Palin, anti-media agenda. Brent Bozell and Bill O'Reilly both love Sarah Palin, O'Reilly has even called her a rock star and a valid candidate for President in 2012. While the rest of the country see her as an unqualified dummy. Polls show that 71% of the American people do not think she is qualified to be the President, and her approval rating is 23%, yet O'Reilly ignores all that to claim she is a qualified candidate. Here is a reality check: Bozell does a biased media study about sarah Palin, then his buddy O'Reilly reports on it. This is done to try and help Sarah Palin get past the accurate impression people have that she is an unqualified dummy. Bozell and O'Reilly are trying to make people think Palin is actually a smart and qualified woman, and that the media just does a biased job of reporting on her. This is ridiculous, biased right-wing garbage, from Bozell and O'Reilly. Sarah Palin is an unqualified dummy, that is a fact, we all saw it during the campaign. Why do you think the McCain campaign refsued to let her do media interviews for three weeks. Because they needed that time to try and coach her up to handle a media interview. They did a test interview with her and she failed it big time. So they needed a few weeks to coach her up, then they finally let her do them and look what happened. She was still a disaster, now just imagine how bad she was before they spent weeks coaching her. Ever after the weeks and weeks of coaching she still made a fool out of herself in the ABC interview with Charlie Gibson, and the CBS interview with Katie Couric. And yet O'Reilly ignores all that, to spin out some biased and flawed media study from the right-wing Media Research Center. Now they are trying to give her a PR makeover, that somehow she is smart now and qualified to be the President, because far right Republicans love her. Guess what folks, once a dummy always a dummy. Palin is a dummy, and as they say, you can not put lipstick on a pig and make it beautiful. That's what Bozell and O'Reilly are trying to do. They are trying to make people think Palin is actually smart and qualified, and that the media just put out biased reporting that make her look stupid. It will not work, because the people have already decided she is a dummy. And the fact that O'Reilly is trying this dirty trick to help her, proves beyond a doubt that he is also a biased Republican. As he claims to be a nonpartisan independent, which is just laughable. The Tuesday 11-17-09 O'Reilly Factor Review By: Steve - November 18, 2009 - 9:40am The TPM was called Sarah Palin Fear Factor. O'Reilly claims the left fears Sarah Palin. This is pure insanity, and only a total right-wing idiot would even claim that, the left does not fear Palin, they actually want her to run for President. Nobody on the left fears her, no-bo-dy. I am on the left and I hope she wins the Republican nomination for President in 2012, in fact, I pray she wins it. Then Obama will crush her, because her approval is 23%, and 71% of the people think she is not qualified to be the President. So I am begging the Republicans to nominate her, then she will lose by a mile to Obama. O'Reilly is an idiot, and nobody on the left fears Sarah Palin. Then Alan Colmes and Monica Crowley were on to discuss it. Colmes said he is not buying it, and that there is no fear. Colmes said it's not fear, it's amusement, people are amused by her, like a ride in an amusement park. Billy called Colmes a pinhead over his opinion. Crowley of course agreed with O'Reilly and claims that Sarah Palin is a great and powerful conservative, and if you believe that crap I have some land to sell you. Crowley loves Palin, just as O'Reilly does, and the whole thing is just pathetic. O'Reilly defended Palin, and said he loves her book, he also said she can be a valid candidate for President in 2012. Proving he is a right-wing nut, because only lunatic right-wingers like Palin. And btw, notice that O'Reilly does not have one person from the McCain campaign to say what they thought of Palin. He does that on purpose because he does not want them to tell the truth about her on his show. O'Reilly only allows liberals to talk bad about Palin, so there is an impression that only liberals do not like her. The next segment was about the terrorist trials in NY, Billy cited a CNN poll that said 64% of the people want them tried in military courts. O'Reilly had Charles Krauthammer on to discuss it, who of course agrees with O'Reilly, and no Democrat was on to give the counterpoint. Krauthammer spun out the usual right-wing propaganda that it's crazy to have the trials in a Federal court. This Krauthammer is a partisan right-wing nut, and anyone who puts this guy on the air is as crazy as he is. Billy loves him, and agrees with almost everything he says. Krauthammer is not an attorney, and he made a bunch of crazy arguments for having the trials in military courts. While Judge Napolitano knows the law and he said they should be tried in a Federal court, based on what the Constitution says. Then O'Reilly had Richard Cohen on from the Southern Poverty Law Center to talk about Lou Dobbs leaving CNN. They claim they were part of the reason he left. Billy bet him $10,000 last July that CNN would never fire Lou Dobbs, and O'Reilly said last night he would pay that debt. Cohen claims they did get CNN to fire Lou Dobbs. They wrote to CNN and called them, and asked them to fire Lou Dobbs for all the lies he is putting out. Then O'Reilly trashed SPLC for getting Dobbs fired, he said what they do is fascist. O'Reilly also said he does not believe they got Dobbs fired, but that he will pay off on the bet anyway. What's funny is O'Reilly calls their methods fascist, yet he did the very same thing when he called for ABC to fire Rosie from the View. O'Reilly did not like the things Rosie was saying so he called on ABC to fire her, which is the exact same thing the SPLC did. Yet he called them fascists for what they did, when he did the very same thing. Pot meet kettle. Then John Stossel was on to trash Obama on the stimulus money, and how it was being spent. And of course Stossel and O'Reilly put out their right-wing spin on the stimulus, they found a typo and claimed it proves they found some bad stuff there. It was ridiculous, all they found were typos and clerical errors. This segment is a joke, it's just another excuse for O'Reilly to have another right-wing nut on to smear Obama. They found a couple errors at recovery.gov and claim the whole website is wrong, which is just ridiculous. And btw, it must be working because the economy is improving, and the stock market is up to 10,400, but O'Reilly and Stossel never report any of that. The next segment was "is it legal" with Lis Wiehl and Kimberly Guilfoyle. And of course they are both Republicans who work for Fox News, O'Reilly does not have a Democratic legal expert, just Republicans. They talked about Sec. Gates blocking the release of the other prisoner abuse photos. Then more garbage about the so-called war on Christmas, a public school told some kids they can not have Christmas items at a Holiday fair, Billy called it fascism. I refuse to even report on this right-wing nonsense. Then they reported on a 5th grader who refuses to say the Pledge of Allegiance because it says liberty and justice for all, but gays and lesbians can not marry, so there is no liberty and justice for all. The law says you can not force the kid to say it, and they agreed he has a right not to say it. The ACLU is involved now, and they are supporting the kid. The last segment was the total waste of tv time Factor news quiz, with Steve Doocy and Martha MacCallum. Billy does 5 news questions for people who work at a news network, and then prizes (like Factor gear) are sent to the winners selected viewer. Then the pinheads and patriots, and the highly edited ridiculous Factor e-mails. These e-mails are so fake, and so edited, it's laughable, last night a man wrote to tell O'Reilly he was so liberal he will not watch him anymore. Wow, if you think O'Reilly is liberal you are retarded, O'Reilly is 99% Republican. Yet he reads an e-mail calling him too liberal, which is about as ridiculous as it gets. It's insane for a viewer to imply it, and it's really insane for O'Reilly to read it on the air as if it's true. O'Reilly Goes After Nancy Pelosi Again By: Steve - November 17, 2009 - 9:30am Glenn Beck had Bill O'Reilly on his radio show yesterday to promote their upcoming Bold & Fresh Insanity Tour, which will take the two right-wing spin doctors around the country to preach what they claims is the so-called truth. When Beck brought up Dennis Miller's appearance on the O'Reilly Factor last week -- in which Miller warned of a coming insurrection, O'Reilly predicted a tax revolt that will get nasty and end up with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi "bobbing up and down in the Boston Harbor." BECK: Last week, I heard you say that -- you were on with Dennis Miller. You two were talking about an insurrection coming.As dumb as Beck is even he knew that was a stupid thing to say, and he wanted no part of it. Beck said" "Uh, I don't think that's necessary." This so-called tax revolt O'Reilly talks about is all in his warped mind. The only tax increase coming is on the wealthy who make over $250,000 a year, and that would only be 2 or 3 percent, which would just put the top Federal tax rate back to where it was under Bill Clinton. And btw folks, in 1992 when Bill Clinton raised taxes 3 percent on people making over $250,000 a year, all the Republicans went nuts and said the economy would crash. They were wrong, over the next 8 years the economy added a record 22 million new jobs, and we had 8 years of economic boom. Not to mention taxes have actually went down under Obama, a fact that O'Reilly totally ignores. Obama gave everyone a tax cut in the form of a rebate check, yet O'Reilly claims taxes have went up, which is just ridiculous and nothing but right-wing spin. The top Federal tax rate is 35%, the same as it was under George W. Bush, it has not went up at all. There has not been any tax increase, none. It's all lies by Bill O'Reilly, Dennis Miller, and Glenn Beck. The Obama administration is talking about a tax increase on people who make over $250,000 a year, and having a tax on those same people in the health care plan, but none of that has happened, and may never happen. Even if it does happen, it will not take place for a year or more, and it will only be on people who make over $250,000 a year. O'Reilly even claimed that Nancy Pelosi was going to raise the top Federal tax rate to 45%, but that is another total lie, it was just made up to make people hate her. So the reality is, there will be no tax revolt, and Pelosi will not be bobbing up and down in the Boston Harbor. As Obama promised in his campaign, he gave 95% of the people a tax cut. And the only people that can not admit that, are right-wing idiots like O'Reilly who want to make Obama look bad for partisan political reasons. |
O'Reilly Caught Lying About House Ethics Committee O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Increase O'Reilly Caught Lying About Limbaugh Racism Most Factor Gear Made in Vietnam And China O'Reilly Caught Lying About Religious Festival O'Reilly Caught Red Handed Lying About CNN O'Reilly Caught Violating Journalistic Standards Again O'Reilly Caught Lying About The ACLU & Racial Profiling More Proof O'Reilly & FOX News Do Not Tell The Truth Factor Pollster Caught Writing GOP Policy Memo O'Reilly Called Bruce Springsteen Un-American & Un-Patriotic The Bill O'Reilly Senate Torture Report Countdown Clock O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Obama Approval Numbers FOX News Caught Lying About Obama Budget O'Reilly Busted For Helping GOP Smear Pelosi O'Reilly Caught Lying About Obama Earmark Promise What a Fair & Balanced O'Reilly Factor Would Look Like Military.com Report Proves O'Reilly Wrong About Homeless Vets O'Reilly Places 7th in 2008 Wingnut of The Year Award O'Reilly Denys Reality About Abstinence Only Programs Conclusive Proof O'Reilly & The Republican Party Are Both Corrupt The Right-Wing Liberal Killer Story O'Reilly Ignored The Facts About O'Reilly And GE Doing Business With Iran How to Deal With an O'Reilly Factor Ambush Interview Buzzflash Names O'Reilly Media Putz of The Week The 10 Page Hand Written Lucifer Letter I Got in 2003 Why FOX News Loves Juan Williams: The Strings And The Puppet
O'Reilly Info O'Reilly Spins Cable News Ratings Read The Letter O'Reilly Had His Attorney Send me O'Reilly Caught Lying About The NY Times JFK Terror Plot O'Reilly's Party Enrollment Form Showing Him a Registered Republican O'Reilly Wins 2004 Misinformer of The Year Award O'Reilly Death Penalty Lies O'Reilly on Top 10 Conservative Idiot List 49 Times Since 2001 O'Reilly Calls Mexicans Wetbacks Mail-to-Bill Hate-Mail FOX News Bias Transcripts Assorted
glenn-beck-sucks.com Think Progress Buzzflash Bartcop AmericaBlog Crooks & Liars Progressive Eruptions Rude Pundit Moveon.org Truthout.com Unknown News Daily Beacon Mike Hersh Prison Planet Moose & Squirrel Politics & Society Apocalypse Cafe Fox News Boycott I Hate Hannity Inebriated Discourse Hannity Sucks LT Saloon NewsCorpse.com Glenn Beck Is An Idiot Nilo Radio
mediamatters.org fair.org alternet.org cjr.org Media Transparency conwebwatch |
| Proof The O'Reilly Factor is Biased Against Barack Obama | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/3mbiasnumbers.htm |
| Proof O'Reilly Lied About The Balance on His Show | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreillybalanced.htm |
| O'Reilly Sucks Investigation: Dishonesty, Deception, And Bias By Bill O'Reilly | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreilly-investigation.htm |
| (( Right-Wing Hate Speech Ignored by Bill O'Reilly )) | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/right-wing-hate.htm |
| O'Reilly Phone Sex Scandal Information | ||
After hearing of the lawsuit O'Reilly said it was all lies, that it was a shakedown for money, that he would fight it to the bitter end with no settlement, and that he would let the courts decide the matter. That was all before O'Reilly found out she had recorded his phone calls. Then Mr. I will fight her lies to the bitter end with no settlement, paid her $10 million dollars to settle the lawsuit, get the tapes, and shut her up. The out-of-court settlement came on the eve of a courtroom fight over audiotapes, reports CBS News Correspondent Kelly Cobiella. |
