Advertise Contact About This Web Site Webmaster Information
Website Info








Want your own server? Beastnode has the fastest, cheapest minecraft hosting around!



Check out usaonlinepokersites.com for information on playing poker in the USA.



Get set this year for FIFA World Cup 2014 in mid June. Lot of people like Golden Boot betting during the world cup as it brings out the real betting craze for fans. If you want traditional betting for FIFA World Cup, WCAction.com has covered.



Visit www.uspokersite.net for US online poker related information and news.



Have a look at these Bally Tech Games and vegasslotsonline.com/real-money



As you already know by now that Oreilly sucks and is the biggest loser. Oreilly facts apart, many people spend their time on computers playing online poker real money games as a hobby.



Do you like to play slots? If so, check out this site for online slots real money



Play online poker at the most trusted online poker room in Canada 888pokercanada.com


Play at online gambling
sites with popular games
like blackjack online



O'Reilly Sucks
Blog Archives

January - 2012
February - 2012
March - 2012
April - 2012
May - 2012
June - 2012
July - 2012
August - 2012
September - 2012
October - 2012
November - 2012
December - 2012

January - 2013
February - 2013
March - 2013
April - 2013
May - 2013
June - 2013
July - 2013
August - 2013
September - 2013
October - 2013
November - 2013
December - 2013

January - 2014
February - 2014
March - 2014
April - 2014

Website Links

O'Reilly Info

The O'Reilly Iraq Apology Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Spins

Cable News Ratings

Read The Letter O'Reilly Had His Attorney Send me

O'Reilly Wins 2004 Misinformer of The Year Award

O'Reilly Death Penalty Lies

O'Reilly on Top 10 Conservative Idiot List 49 Times Since 2001

O'Reilly Calls Mexicans Wetbacks

Mail-to-Bill

Hate-Mail

O'Reilly #5 On Top 25 Right-Wing Journalist List

O'Reilly Factor Year In Review 2009

Factor Pollster Caught Writing GOP Policy Memo

What a Fair & Balanced O'Reilly Factor Would Look Like

Transcript: Bill O'Reilly v Jeremy Glick

Peabody Award Facts

Bill Clinton Enron News

Buzzflash Names O'Reilly Media Putz of The Week

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly & The Republican Party Are Both Corrupt

The Right-Wing Liberal Killer Story O'Reilly Ignored

The Facts About O'Reilly And GE Doing Business With Iran

How to Deal With an O'Reilly Factor Ambush Interview

Why FOX News Loves Juan Williams: The Strings And The Puppet

Blogroll

ultimatetop10s.com/
AmericaBlog
Progressive Eruptions
Rude Pundit
Moveon.org
Prison Planet
Apocalypse Cafe
Fox News Boycott
Inebriated Discourse
Hannity Sucks
NewsCorpse.com
Glenn Beck Is An Idiot
Ranker.com
GlennBeckReport.com
lauraingrahamsucks.com





The Factor Guest List Count

April 2014 (11 Shows) Republicans - 75 | Democrats - 15

The Factor Guest List Count Archives

Ratings: The O'Reilly Factor - Total Viewers

Monday - 4-14-14 -- O'Reilly - 2.361
Tuesday - 4-15-14 -- O'Reilly -
Wednesday - 4-16-14 -- O'Reilly -
Thursday - 4-17-14 -- O'Reilly -
Friday - 4-18-14 -- O'Reilly -

Weekly Factor Average -

The Cable News Ratings Archives

Oreilly is a polarizing figure and so is online gaming, especially at Begado Casino. There are advocates in Congress proposing a federal law, but Republican detractors. This, according to a supporter of Steve and Oreilly-sucks.com, who runs a Begado Fan Blog. The conservative approach is to stick to legitimate gaming certifications and brands like Begado, says Zachary Gleason.


The O'Reilly Sucks Blog

Taxpayers Deliver $7.8 Billion Tax Bill To Walmart
By: Steve - April 17, 2014 - 10:00am

The Walton family receives $7.8 billion in tax breaks and taxpayer subsidies each year, and outraged taxpayers are demanding that Walmart pay up. According to a press release from Our Walmart:
Walmart workers and taxpayers in Phoenix delivered a $7.8 billion tax bill to Rob Walton, Walmart Chairman, in reaction to the news that the country's largest retailer and richest family received an estimated $7.8 billion in tax breaks and subsidies in 2013.

A report released yesterday by Americans for Tax Fairness showed how Walmart and the Waltons dodged taxes, exploited loopholes and took advantage of taxpayer subsidies, while many of its workers were forced to rely on taxpayer-funded programs like food stamps and Medicaid.

The taxpayers hand-delivered the bill to Walton's home in Paradise Valley, outside Phoenix.
"Like most Americans, I work hard, pay my taxes and play by the rules. Why can't America's richest family do the same?" said Venanzi Luna, a Walmart worker who signed the bill.

"Our economy is out of balance and workers are struggling because people like the Waltons don't pay their fair share."

Walmart made a $16 billion profit in 2013, and the six Walton heirs, who own more than 50 percent of Walmart shares, saw their wealth grow to $148.8 billion, more wealth than 49% of American families combined.

Walmart takes in 18% of all food stamp dollars and generates $13.5 billion in revenue from food stamps. This isn't enough robbing of the taxpayer for the Walton family, because they also get $3 billion in individual tax breaks, and Walmart itself gets another $1 billion.

The next time Republicans talk about how America can't afford veterans benefits, or to extend unemployment benefits, they need to be reminded that a simple solution is right in front of their eyes. If Republicans would close the Walmart tax loopholes, and raise the minimum wage so that Walmart workers didn't have to rely on public assistance, the government would have tens of billions more.

Those low prices that Walmart advertises really aren't that low. Taxpayers are picking up the tab, and when one factors in the billions that all Americans have to pay to subsidize Walmart's profits those always low prices come at a very high cost to every American.

The Tuesday 4-15-14 O'Reilly Factor Review
By: Steve - April 16, 2014 - 11:00am

The TPM was called: Voter Suppression. The biased and dishonest Bill O'Reilly said this:
O'REILLY: The grievance industry believes that requiring IDs to vote is a right-wing plot to deny some Americans their voting rights. 33 states currently have voting ID laws, with more states considering it. The left denies any voter fraud, which is absurd. Just this month, North Carolina launched a huge investigation into voter fraud, with accusations that some folks voted in two states.

Also, at least 81 North Carolinians voted in 2013 after they died! Most precincts do have control over the voting process, but there is no downside to having one system for the whole country. Enter former U.N. Ambassador Andrew Young and former President Bill Clinton, who propose that all Social Security cards have a photo ID attached, which would serve as a voter ID.

This makes sense because all Americans are required to have a Social Security card, but the far left still objects over 'privacy issues.' What privacy issues? Does a driver's license violate your privacy? This is a ruse because the grievance industry wants people to think the Republican Party is suppressing votes, and if you take that issue away they have one less thing to whine about.

Andrew Young and Bill Clinton, both Democrats, are doing the country a service. Let's get the pictures on the Social Security cards and stop the nonsense.
And as usual that is mostly right-wing propaganda, because Republicans are trying to suppress the vote for people who vote Democrat, it's a fact. They are trying to solve a problem we do not have, the voter fraud rate is less than 0.2%, so it almost never happens, and when it does it's rare and usually just a mistake, not illegals voting.

To prove it, Republicans are for voter ID and Democrats are opposed to it, that's all you need to know, and of course the Republican O'Reilly is for it. And as far as the far-left being opposed to a photo on your social security card, that is a lie, O'Reilly just made it up, because I do not know any liberals who oppose it, including myself. In fact, I think it's a great idea.

Then Alan Colmes and Monica Crowley were on to talk about the Social Security card idea.

Colmes said this: "The reason Bill Clinton and Andrew Young want to do this, is to stop the right from whining about people not having the right identification. Voting ID fraud doesn't take place at the voting booth, it happens when you register to vote."

Crowley said this nonsense: "Fraud is widespread and it is very real. A million people who are dead are still on registered voting rolls across the country. My issue with the Social Security card is that this would be the federal government doing this, I think it should be left to the states."

But even O'Reilly took issue with Crowley's "states rights" argument, saying this: "National elections are very important and Social Security cards provide a uniform ID for everybody in the United States."

Then the Republican Senator John McCain, who has urged the Obama administration and the West to help Ukraine fend off Russian aggression, was on to discuss it, with no Democratic guest for balance.

McCain said this: "I would rush defensive weapons to Ukraine, along with body armor, night vision, intelligence capabilities, and economic assistance. Their country has just been partially dismembered despite a solemn treaty, and Russia is about to do the same thing in eastern Ukraine and they may do the same thing in southern Ukraine."

McCain also said this: "Vladimir Putin has said the worst thing that happened in the 20th century was the breakup of the Soviet Union, and he wants to restore the old Russian empire. But President Obama won't even give Ukraine defensive weapons, this is another total failure and lack of leadership and a fundamental misreading of Putin."

Then John Stossel for his right-wing perspective on the complex tax system. And of course no Democratic guest was on for balance.

Stossel said this: "This is the tax code, pointing to three massive volumes on the desk, and there are 75,000 more pages of explanations. So nobody can understand this stuff! You have to go to politicians and kiss their ring and give them money to get special breaks. Then there are subsidies that even the lawyers don't understand."

O'Reilly added that the IRS is hardly the only tax collector, saying this: "We're paying 40% to the federal government in income tax and more to the state, and then everything we do is taxed. I'm pessimistic and say this will never be reformed, things will not get better in the tax realm."

Please shut up about taxes, people are so tired of millionaires crying about taxes. You should be glad it's not 1980 and you are not paying 70% on the income you do not earn talking on tv for an hour a day while real working men and women pay taxes for doing real work at low wages.

Then Kimberly Guilfoyle and Lis Wiehl examined the showdown in Nevada, where rancher Cliven Bundy defied the feds who want him to pay grazing fees for using federal land.

Wiehl said this: "The federal officials, were met with hundreds of protesters who were in favor of Bundy. The government pulled back, saying it's a 'public safety' issue, but Bundy is still on the hook for $1 million in grazing fees and taxes."

Guilfoyle contended that Bundy and his supporters are on the wrong side of the law, saying this: "They say it isn't federal land, they say it belongs to the state and that they've been grazing on this land for years, but it does belong to the federal government. I think the government should settle this for something less than $1 million."

And of course they said nothing about the right-wing militia groups that showed up armed to defend Bundy. Now imagine what O'Reilly and the right would say if a liberal and his friends did that, he would call for the National Guard to wipe them out, and say we have laws and it's chaos if we do not enforce them.

Then Pastor Robert Jeffers was on to talk about the notion of an afterlife. Which should not be on a so-called news show, this is not news, it's religious garbage.

Jeffers said this: "We can't prove anything, but for every human desire there is a corresponding reality in nature - we get thirsty because there is water, we crave physical intimacy because there is sex. And the reason we may desire immortality is because it really exists. Then look at the near-death experiences that millions of people claim to have had, which suggest there is consciousness that transcends brain waves. But I think the most compelling evidence for life after death is that the body of Jesus has not been found in 2,000 years. That's not theology, that's historical fact. Something big happened in Jerusalem and I believe it was the resurrection."

Then again, maybe when you die you die, and there is no afterlife, it's all speculation and right-wing religious mumbo jumbo. This is not news and O'Reilly is a moron for putting that Pastor on the air to talk about this nonsense.

And finally, the lame Factor tip of the day called: The Taxman Returneth. Billy said this: "There's a website where you can enter some financial information and get a quick calculation of how large your tax refund will be. You can check it out at hrblock.com/get-answers/tax-calculators.html"

Two Old Right-Wing White Guys Discuss Racism Complaints
By: Steve - April 16, 2014 - 10:00am

This is classic O'Reilly, Fox News does a segment on racism with 4 white people, which is not only bias, it's not fair and balanced as Fox claims to be. So O'Reilly has Brit Hume on to discuss the segment on race with 4 white people, he said the segment was ok, even if it had 4 white people, then he was slammed for it on twitter and the internet.

So what does O'Reilly do, he has the old right-wing white guy Brit Hume on to decide if the segment with the 4 whites was wrong, or if it was unfair to not have any blacks on the panel. And what a shocker, Hume and O'Reilly (the 2 white guys) decided it was fair and ok, and there was no racism.

Which is just laughable. Because they still did not have any blacks on to discuss it, none, zero. How in the hell can you discuss racism if you do not have any blacks on to discuss it. And what makes it even worse is that it was on Fox and nobody was there to give the other side, it was biased and one sided, and this was from the so-called fair and balanced news network.

O'Reilly went on to agree with Hume's basic premise, arguing that if Obama had been white, then Hillary Clinton would have defeated him in 2008.

Which is 100% pure speculation, and there is no way O'Reilly could know that would have happened. Because one of the big reasons Obama beat Hillary is because he voted no on the Iraq war and Hillary voted yes. I would argue that even if Obama was white he would have beat her just because he voted no on Iraq. So O'Reilly violated his own no speculation rule to say something he has no proof would have happened.

Hume described Obama as an "appealing person who seemed to be non-divisive, not a race hustler in any way" and therefore Americans "were proud of him, proud to see him elected" and has received "perhaps more than he would were he a white man, the benefit of the doubt from a great many people."

Hume lamented that "being called a racist or labeled a racist, particularly if it's successful, is one of the worst things that can happen to you in America."

Then stop being a racist and making statements that defend racism and unfair segment on Fox with all white panels. This is real simple, try actually being a fair and balanced news network and have at least one liberal black person on when you talk about racism, then you will not be accused of being an unfair racist.

When you talk racism with 4 white people, you invite charges of racism, so dont do it, idiots.

The Monday 4-14-14 O'Reilly Factor Review
By: Steve - April 15, 2014 - 11:00am

The TPM was called: Will President Obama Stop Putin? The biased and dishonest Bill O'Reilly said this:
O'REILLY: It is now becoming clear that Russia will try to seize part of Ukraine, an independent country. The Ukrainian government is desperately asking the West for help, but so far the response has been timid. Talking Points understands that President Obama does not want a military engagement with Russia because our allies will not back him up. Therefore, little is likely to happen to Putin.

There is no question that Putin is a villain who is violating international law. Russia wants to seize as much of Ukraine as it can, it doesn't really care about world opinion. And public opinion in America is pretty much non-existent, the level of concern about Ukraine is paltry. Once again, the situation mirrors what Hitler did in the 1930s, and back then the West did not want a confrontation with the dictator. 75 years later, we're looking at a similar situation with Putin.

The only question that remains is, how crazy is this guy? Eastern European nations like the Baltic states, Moldova, and even Poland are very worried. They know the USA is a paper tiger. Talking Points believes President Obama understands the situation but is not likely to confront Putin effectively any time soon.
And as usual O'Reilly says nothing about the majority of Americans who say we should stay out of it and mind our own business. If Putin wants to seize part of Ukraine let him, it is not happening in America and we should stop trying to be the police to the world.

Then Mary K. Ham and Juan Williams were on to discuss it.

Williams said this: "I don't think Putin is Hitler. Not only did Hitler want to kill an entire race of people, he wanted to conquer all of Europe. Putin is trying to restore Soviet primacy in that part of the world, but I don't think he has any sense that he would go beyond Ukraine. And I think the Obama administration has been pretty strong here."

But of course Ham agreed with O'Reilly and disagreed with Williams assessment, saying this: "I don't think the administration has a cohesive view of what to do here. The battle was lost a long time ago at the beginning of Obama's first term when he abandoned missile defense systems in several Eastern European nations. That enticed Putin to think he can do these things and we're now stuck with options that are not great."

To begin with, who cares what O'Reilly, Ham, or Williams have to say about it, they are not foreign policy experts, or elected officials, they are just stooges who work for Fox. They do not know what the intelligence is, or what secret calls or deals the Obama administration is working with Putin, so they are not qualified to discuss it.

Then O'Reilly talked about racism and Congressman Steve Israel, who is head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, that has accused many Republicans of being "racist"

So what does O'Reilly do, have the far-right stooge Ben Carson on to discuss it, with no Democratic black guest for balance. Carson of course defended the Republicans and Fox, because he is one of them and he works for Fox.

Carson said this: "These accusations resonate with people, which is the reason they do it. And there are some major philosophical differences in our country right now. Progressive people believe government is the answer to many of our problems, while others believe rugged individualism and individual responsibility are important. Those are huge philosophical clashes."

Earth to fool, they resonate with people because they are true.

O'Reilly said that many Democrats are using race as a protective shield, saying this: "It's clear that President Obama's policies have largely failed, you see trouble almost everywhere. So in order to obscure that, Obama and Holder and the Democratic Party are making it personal."

Which is just ridiculous, the Obama policies have mostly worked, and there is real racism against Obama by the Republicans, especially the tea party, and that is a fact. O'Reilly and Carson will just not admit it, and it's why he does not have any black liberals on to discuss it.

Then Brit Hume was on to talk about Attorney General Eric Holder, who implied that he and President Obama are disrespected because of their race, Fox News analyst Brit Hume declared that the two men have actually benefitted from their skin color.

Hume said this: "The overwhelming majority of Americans believe African Americans should rise in our society, and that enhanced Barack Obama's prospects. He was an appealing person who seemed to be non-divisive and Americans were proud to see him elected. Therefore, he has gotten the benefit of the doubt from a great many people."

But there is still racism against them by the Republicans, Hume and O'Reilly just refuse to admit it.

Then Bernie Goldberg was on, he expressed total disgust with race- and gender-baiting by Democrats, including President Obama. And of course no Democratic guest was on for balance, making it a one sided joke of a debate by 2 old right-wing white men who both work for Fox.

Goldberg said this: "The one thing this president does well, is turn Americans against one another. He's doing it now because he has to desperately rev up his base ahead of the November elections. Democrats can't run on the economy or ObamaCare or foreign policy, so he resurrects this supposed 'war on women' and he goes before Al Sharpton's group and tells them Republicans are threatening their voting rights."

Goldberg also said this: "Eric Holder goes to the same group and implies that he and the president get harsh treatment because they're black. It is never a good idea for the president to stoke resentment, but this president told us there would be no more black and white America, there would be one united America. That Barack Obama doesn't exist any more and I don't think he ever existed."

And if you believe any of that biased propaganda you are a fool, nothing Goldberg said is true, it's all right-wing spin and lies. There is racism against Obama and other blacks from the right, and they are just pointing it out to try and stop it so they can have a debate on the issues, not debate hating people because of their skin color. If there was no racism they would not even mention it.

Then the moron Jesse Watters was on, he went to Cleveland and the Rock 'n Roll Hall of Fame for some stupid reason, which inducted some new members over the weekend. He asked some eminent rockers for their thoughts on the political atmosphere.

Here are a few of their responses: "I have no idea what you're talking about" ... "I never believed that musicians should get involved with politics" ... "It would be nice to have an election instead of an auction" ... "The biggest problem in this country right now is how alcoholics and addicts are treated."

Back in the Studio, Watters reported on one particularly contentious interview, saying this: "When we were interviewing Sheryl Crow and Bonnie Raitt, I asked them about Hillary Clinton and all hell broke loose. They said they wouldn't do political questions, and then they said this was an ambush and unacceptable. Just because there was one political question!"

And they were right, they know who and what you are and they are not going to fall for your tricks.

And finally, the lame Factor tip of the day called: When Things Get Tough. Billy said this: "Even when you are physically drained or mentally down, do everything in your power to tough it out and get things done. A big part of self-discipline is not giving in to adversity."

Obama Slams GOP For Bogus Voter Fraud Claims
By: Steve - April 15, 2014 - 10:00am

Obama: The 'Real Voter Fraud' Comes From 'People Who Try To Deny Our Rights'

President Barack Obama delivered a fiery speech against Republicans on Friday, charging that the GOP is threatening voting rights in America.

Appearing at Al Sharpton's National Action Network conference, Obama cited a 2006 DOJ analysis showing that out of 197 million votes cast for federal elections between 2002 and 2005, only 40 voters were indicted for fraud.

"For those of you who are math majors, that is a percentage that is 0.00002 percent," Obama said, drawing cheers from the crowd.

Obama then pointed to who he considers to be the real perpetrators: the people behind these "bogus" claims.

"Let's be clear," Obama said. "The real voter fraud is people who try to deny our rights by making bogus arguments about voter fraud."

The president pinned efforts to curb access to the ballot box directly on the GOP, declaring that the effort "has not been led by both parties. It's been led by the Republican Party."

For the remainder of the year, no political issue stands out more prominently for Democrats than their ability to motivate voters to turn out at the polls in November. Control of the Senate, now in the hands of Democrats, is at stake, as is Obama's already limited ability to push his agenda through Congress.

But traditionally weak midterm turnout by Democrats coupled with efforts in some states to limit early voting and to enact voter identification requirements have prompted the president and his party to raise alarms and step up their get-out-the-vote efforts.

Republicans have long argued that identification requirements and other voting controls are reasonable measures designed to safeguard the balloting process, not to suppress voter turnout. Democrats say photo identification requirements especially affect minority or low-income voters who may not drive and thus wouldn't have an official government ID.

Basically the Republicans are trying to solve a voter fraud problem that is not there, voter fraud is rare and almost never happens. The reality is that they are simply trying to suppress the vote among people who vote for Democrats, so they can win more elections. And O'Reilly does not condemn it because he is one of them and he hopes their plan works.

Real Obamacare Numbers 9.3 Million Not 7.1 Million
By: Steve - April 14, 2014 - 11:00am

And that does not count all the people that were added to Medicaid due to the Obama health care bill. Including me, I am now on Medicaid and my prescriptions only cost $2.00 each. O'Reilly does not talk about any of this, because he does not want you to know how good it is working now.

The long-awaited Rand Corp. study of Obamacare's effect on health insurance coverage was released Tuesday and confirmed the numbers that had been telegraphed for more than a week: At least 9.3 million more Americans have health insurance now than in September 2013, virtually all of them as a result of the Obama health care law.

Let me repeat that for the idiots on the right, 9.3 million more people have health insurance now than they did 7 months ago, and that includes the million people who lost their old plans that were over-priced and not very good anyway. O'Reilly and the right predicted they would not even get the 7.1 million, leat alone the 9.3 million, and it would have been more if the website had worked from the start.

That's a net figure, accommodating all those who lost their individual health insurance because of cancellations. The Rand study confirms other surveys that placed the number of people who lost their old insurance and did not or could not replace it -- the focus of an enormous volume of anti-Obamacare rhetoric -- at less than 1 million. The Rand experts call this a "very small" number, less than 1% of the U.S. population age 18 to 64.

The Rand study was eagerly anticipated in part because of the dearth of hard information from other sources, including the federal and state governments, which are still compiling their statistics and may not have a full slate for months.

The number of people getting insurance through their employers increased by 8.2 million. Rand said the increase is likely to have been driven by a decline in unemployment, which made more people eligible for employer plans, and by the incentives in the Affordable Care Act encouraging more employer coverage. The figure certainly undermines the contention by the healthcare law's critics that the legislation gave employers an incentive to drop coverage.

Basically, it proves that all the garbage O'Reilly and the right were spewing out about Obamacare was lies.

And btw, this is for you O'Reilly: These figures are only the leading edge of a long-term trend. "It's still early in the life of the ACA," Rand said. Its experts expect more enrollments "as people become more familiar with the law, the individual mandates increase to their highest levels, the employer mandate kicks in, and other changes occur."

But their bottom line is that the law already has led to "a substantial increase in insurance coverage."

Your move O'Reilly, what say you fool.

Here Is What You Would Get If Republicans Gain Power
By: Steve - April 13, 2014 - 11:00am



Fox News Top Deceiver O'reilly Calls Colbert A Deceiver
By: Steve - April 13, 2014 - 10:00am

Last month Bill O'Reilly offered his rebuttal to the argument that income inequality is contributing to the current state of economic stagnation and the bitter partisanship in political circles. He dismissed any notion that there is a problem with having 400 of the richest Americans controlling more wealth than the rest of the 350 million of us combined. Instead, O'Reilly said this:
O'REILLY: The truth is there will never be equality in this world. That's impossible, an opium-laced dream. I will never have equality with my fellow Irishman Shaquille O'Neal he is bigger and stronger than I am by nature. I will never be as smart as Einstein, as talented as Mozart or as kind as Mother Teresa. Each human being is born with abilities, but they are not equal abilities.
Let me add this, Bill O'Reilly is an idiot. Because if the income equality was better, and the bottom 99% were getting a bigger slice of the pie everything in the country would be better. Crime would go down, the economy would be doing better, and people would not be so mad at how hard it is to get by and make a decent living. Colbert is 100% right and O'Reilly is 100% wrong, he is just too partisan and too stupid to understand or admit it.

Shaq being taller than O'Reilly has nothing to do with any of it, and that argument sounds like something a 5 year old would say. And it shows that O'Reilly does not have a clue what the income equality debate is about. It has nothing to do with artificial uniformity of human life forms, physically, intellectually, or emotionally. It is about society sharing responsibilities fairly. It is about insuring that powerful elites and faceless corporations are not permitted to exploit everybody else while shirking their own civic duties. Or as Stephen Colbert said:
COLBERT: Shaquille O'Neal is taller than Bill O'Reilly, therefore the richest 1 percent of Americans should control 40 percent of the nation's wealth.
Colbert's hilarious smackdown of O'Reilly really got to him. Because on Wednesday night's Factor show, O'Reilly devoted his opening Talking Points Memo to slamming Colbert. He called Colbert "a deceiver" and an “"deological fanatic" who is "misguided in the extreme." Which is exactly what O'Reilly is, so he was also talking about himself. But O'Reilly was not done making a fool of himself, he also said this:
O'REILLY: Colbert can be dismissed as clueless, but the guy does do damage because he gives cover to the powerful people who are selling Americans a big lie, that this country is bad, that it intentionally oppresses many of its own citizens. That is a lie. That point of view is shameful.
Except of course Colbert never said or implied that the country is bad. O'Reilly just made that up, and in fact, it could be argued that as a so-called journalist on a so-called news network it is O'Reilly that gives cover to the powerful people who are selling Americans a big lie. While Colbert is a comedian on a comedy channel doing a fake news show, so nobody really takes him serious.

Colbert and millions of other Americans recognize that it is flawed with respect to the over-weighting of influence by upper-crusty plutocrats. Recent decisions by the right-wing dominated Supreme Court that give ever-more power to the rich are evidence of the wealth-centric bias that keeps average citizens from having an equal say in public affairs.

When money equals speech, the rich get more of it, and the poor can only buy silence. That's a position that fits squarely with O'Reilly's world view. Last year he actually lamented the fate of the rich as the ones who were really oppressed.

O'Reilly also sought to school Colbert on the philosophy of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. saying that "Maybe Colbert should understand that Dr. King gave his life for equality of opportunity."

But that is a stupendously false and ignorant misreading of King's message. King gave his life in the fight for actual equality and freedom from oppression, not the "opportunity" of it. And the fight continues to this day with people like O'Reilly who defend a status quo that favors rich folks like himself.

And clearly O'Reilly does not have the intellectual or comedic ability to go toe-to-toe with Colbert. Basically Colbert put a truth smackdown on O'Reilly, and the best O'Reilly could do for a comeback was call him a deceiver and say he hates the country.

Which is all nonsense, and the standard crap O'Reilly spins out when someone nails him good. If you dare to disagree with O'Reilly, somehow you are a liar who hates the country, it's ridiculous. And frankly, you would think someone with a Harvard degree could come up with something better than that.

The Friday 4-11-14 O'Reilly Factor Review
By: Steve - April 12, 2014 - 11:00am

The far-right biased hack Laura Ingraham filled in for O'Reilly, her TPM was called: Changes in the White House. She said this:
INGRAHAM: Everybody was making nice at the White House today as the president thanked outgoing HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius for her fine work on the Affordable Care Act. Was Sebelius fired? Who knows? My question is, how on Earth did she keep her job until now. She oversaw one of the most abysmal product rollouts since New Coke, and for that alone she should have been fired.

And what did ObamaCare actually achieve? Many of the 7.5 enrollees are people who had their policies canceled because of ObamaCare. There have also been job losses, premium hikes, out-of-pocket costs soaring, doctors retiring early, and the list goes on. No corporate CEO or NCAA coach would have survived with a comparable win-loss ratio.

Obama kept Sebelius as long as he did for political reasons; he doesn't like to fire people because it admits his fallibility. After 'Fast and Furious' and Benghazi and the IRS targeting, why is Eric Holder still at the Justice Department? And why was Susan Rice promoted?

I suspect the real reason Sebelius is leaving has more to do with you voters. With the midterm elections looking grim for his party, the president could not keep the face of healthcare reform in place. And come Election Day, you have the chance to help rid us of a lot more people who are in over their heads.
And that my friends is total right-wing spin, from a right-wing hack who hates Obama and lies to make him look bad. Almost everything she said is either wrong or a lie.

Then Ed Henry was on to talk about the Sebelius departure, saying this: "It might not really have been up to her. They're saying that she approached the president in early March and offered her resignation, but the president did not ask her to reconsider, which suggests that the president did not want her to stick around. They didn't want to announce that in early March because they finally had some good news and didn't want to stunt the momentum. She took a lot of hits for this, but ultimately it's the person in the Oval Office who will take the heat."

Then Rich Benjamin of the liberal think tank Demos was on to talk about race in America, and Holder saying he is partly attacked because of his race. Which of course Ingraham and O'Reilly refuse to admit is true.

Benjamin said this: "This is not about attacking the Republicans, it's about protecting our democracy. The president sees it as protecting the fundamental right to vote."

Ingraham argued that the president and his top law enforcement official are cynically using race as an shield, saying this: "The attorney general is supposed to enforce the law without regard to party politics, but this week he turned his position into a battering ram against the Republican Party, using this sickening and cynical race card. I find that antithetical to what the civil rights movement was supposed to be about."

Earth to Ingraham and O'Reilly, there is racism in the Republican party towards Obama and Holder, and that is a fact, you two stooges will just not admit it. Because you are right-wing jerks that do not want to admit some of your people are racists.

Then immigration activist Francisco Hernandez was on to talk about former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, a prospective presidential candidate in 2016, who called illegal immigration "an act of love."

Hernandez said this: "All these folks want to do, is have an opportunity to buy their ticket on the bus and get a piece of the American pie. Who can blame them, there is opportunity here. At least Jeb Bush has been consistent."

Ingraham argued that politicians should spend more time worrying about American workers, saying this: "There isn't comparable compassion for the middle class, the people who are not seeing their lives getting better. Those are the people who are affected by illegal immigration."

Which is just laughable, because nobody in the Republican party gives a damn about the middle class, they just say they do to get their votes, they they do everything possible to screw the working man and help the wealthy and the corporations. And Ingraham is a fool who helps them spin out their lies and propaganda.

Then Democratic strategist Richard Goodstein, a former aide to Hillary Clinton was on, and Ingraham asked him why she is qualified to be president. Which is a stupid question.

Goodstein said this: "She has a lot of accomplishments, and the paramount one is that when Barack Obama was saving the economy from the precipice, she was salvaging the U.S. reputation around the world. She got Russia to agree on sanctions against Iran, she got a coalition against Qadafi, and she was a beacon for women and children around the world. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are met with a tumultuous welcome every place they go."

But of course the far-right loon Ingraham refused to buy what Goodstein was selling, saying this: "I'm not saying she's not a nice person, but we're talking about accomplishments. The Middle East is still in turmoil, Eastern Europe is afraid of what Putin will do next, and China is on the move. We look feckless!"

Then Mike Huckabee, who may run for president in 2016, was on to stress the importance of traditional values, including traditional marriage. Notice that he is still working for Fox, which is ridiculous, they are letting him use his show for publicity to run for President, it's unethical and wrong.

Huckabee said this: "The position I hold, is the position that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden held in 2008. The president said in 2008 that he stood for traditional marriage because he's a Christian and that's what the Bible taught. I'd like to ask him whether he was lying then, whether he's lying now, or did the Bible get re-written."

Huckabee also said that traditional values are not at odds with pocketbook issues: "Of course we have to focus on jobs and the economy, but you can also talk about issues that touch people's basic sense of character and tradition and history."

Said the far-right bible thumping loon that will never be President.

Then Howard Kurtz was on to say a lot of reporters and producers seem to be protective of President Obama. Which is his opinion, and almost everyone else disagrees with that. Obama gets slammed in the media all the time, and that is a fact.

Kurtz said this: "There is a collision of several things. On one hand, some news outlets seem to be going softer on President Obama than, say, President Bush. And there is less investigative reporting, particularly in television, because it is expensive and time-consuming and you tick people off. The softer segments are easier to do and they're cheaper."

Republicans Unanimously Block Debate On Gender Pay Equity Bill
By: Steve - April 12, 2014 - 10:00am

And of course O'Reilly never said a word about it, because he is a Republican who agrees with them, and has even lied that there is no gender pay gap.

Senate Republicans voted unanimously on Wednesday to block debate from beginning on Democratic-led legislation aimed at narrowing the pay gap between men and women.

The motion to proceed to the Paycheck Fairness Act received 53 votes for, and 44 against, falling short of the 60 needed to defeat a filibuster.

The bill, sponsored by Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), is backed by President Obama. It would make it easier for a woman to sue an employer if she's getting paid less than a male counterpart for doing the same work. It would also prohibit employer retaliation against workers for talking about how much they earn.

Sounds reasonable to me, who could possibly be opposed to it, Bill O'Reilly and the the Republicans of course. Which is another part of their war on women, the same war O'Reilly denies there is, even though we have example after example proving it, including this one.

The Thursday 4-10-14 O'Reilly Factor Review
By: Steve - April 11, 2014 - 11:00am

The TPM was called: Is Attorney General Eric Holder Playing the Race Card? The biased and dishonest Bill O'Reilly said this:
O'REILLY: On Tuesday Eric Holder testified in front of the House Judiciary Committee about the IRS scandal and other controversies. Then, speaking before Al Sharpton's advocacy group on Wednesday, Holder asked, 'What Attorney General has ever had to deal with that kind of treatment?'

The heavy evidence is that Eric Holder is using his skin color as a shield to avoid explaining to the American people why he has been so ineffective on a variety of fronts. It's long past time to stop this kind of nonsense. Richard Nixon was treated far more harshly by Congress than Barack Obama, and his Attorney General, John Mitchell, was ruined over the Watergate investigation.

The truth is that Eric Holder has been treated gently by the national press and has not been subject to much scrutiny. His first duty is to the people, not to his party or the president, but we get nothing from him. He holds back documents from Congress and he stonewalls time and again. That's the truth and it has nothing to do with skin color.
And as usual, O'Reilly denies any and all racism, which is what he does, protect whites from charges of racism. In O'Reillyworld there is no racism, no matter how blatant. Earth to Bill O'Reilly, black people are victims of racism every day, even rich and powerful blacks like Eric Holder. Who are you to say he is a liar?

Then black radio talk show hosts Eboni Williams and Richard Fowler were on to discuss it. And btw folks, O'Reilly and the right hate Eric Holder because he was part of the Clinton administration. So they already have a bias against him.

Williams said this: "To say Eric Holder has done nothing is just not true. He has a specific agenda regarding civil rights issues, and on that he has been very effective. He has brought challenges to states that have enacted illegal voting laws, and he's done a variety of things with the NYPD and stop-and-frisk."

Fowler said this: "He is contending that he and the president are treated differently because they happen to be African American. Race relations are not good, and that spills over to the president and the attorney general and the first lady."

O'Reilly accused Holder of bringing up race in a divisive manner, saying this: "We're talking about this country's chief law enforcement officer speaking in a public forum to African Americans and implying that the criticism of him is because he's black. He has nothing to back that up!"

Then James Carville was on to talk about the biased right-wing Fox News analyst George Will, who ranks the IRS targeting scandal right up there with Watergate and Iran-Contra. Which is just ridiculous, but O'Reilly agrees with him so he promotes that nonsense.

Carville said this: "He has everything to support that but evidence. Watergate and Iran-Contra were characterized by White House involvement, but there is not a scintilla of evidence of White House involvement here. This has nothing to do with the White House or President Obama."

O'Reilly said this: "If Lois Lerner is taking the Fifth, you know she's done something that she knows she's in trouble for."

Earth to Bill O'Reilly, read my lips. There is NO evidence President Obama or anyone in the White House had anything to do with it, NONE. So it does not compare to Watergate or Iran-Contra. Move on to real news you right-wing hack.

Then Heather Nauert was on for mad as hell, she read e-mails from viewers. One of them, Debbie Rogers Bianchi of Oregon, is ticked off because Hillary Clinton and other liberals often portray women as victims.

Nauert said this: "We haven't actually heard Hillary Clinton say 'war on women,' but she seems to think there is one. She talks about how the clock is turning back on women's rights and warns that extremists want to go after women. They never talk about the advantages that women have in this country, they like to play victim."

Said the Republican who works at Fox, who read an e-mail from a Republican who watches Fox, with no Democratic guest for balance.

Myrna Bauman of Utah complained that derelict fathers often go unmentioned in stories about unmarried moms. Nauert said this: "40% of the babies today are born to unwed mothers, and in 1960 that figure was 5%. There are about 12-million deadbeat dads and this is obviously a sad situation."

Then Megyn Kelly was on to talk about the case of 16-year-old Pennsylvania student Alex Hribal, who slashed and stabbed 21 of his classmates Wednesday.

Kelly said this: "He has been charged as an adult, but his lawyers are pushing to get this into juvenile court. Something is odd about this case - his lawyers are saying his family is like the Brady Bunch, they had dinner together every night, he wasn't bullied, and he has no prior history of mental health issues. It doesn't add up, it's very rare for a boy of this age to just snap."

Then the far-right Laura Ingraham was on to talk about the reaction to Republican Jeb Bush's description of illegal immigration as "an act of love." And of course there was no Democratic guest on for balance.

Ingraham said this: "That was a very sloppy formulation by Jeb Bush. You could use that 'they did it out of love' argument for a lot of behavior that is not good for society. You could say you steal from a convenience store because you need food for your kids. What does that have to do with whether hundreds of thousands of people crossing our borders illegally is good for American workers, good for our public schools, and good for our health care and infrastructure?"

Ingraham also said this: "Jeb Bush believes it's a moral imperative that anyone who can get a toe across the border, as long as they're not a felon, should be allowed to stay here. We have borders that are supposed to mean something!"

And finally, the lame Factor tip of the day that was not a tip. It was O'Reilly telling people to learn about Jesus. Hey O'Reilly, stop trying to force religion on people, if they want it they will find it.

E.J. Dionne: Republicans Were Wrong About Obamacare
By: Steve - April 11, 2014 - 10:00am

And I would add O'Reilly to the list, because he has said the very same thing Republicans were saying, that it was a disaster and in chaos, while everyone else knew it would work after they get the website fixed and work out the bugs. Proving once again that O'Reilly is nothing but a right-wing shill who pretends to be an Independent and impartial journalist.

Here are some quotes from the E.J. Dionne article in the Washington Post:

Is there any accountability in American politics for being completely wrong? Is there any cost to those who say things that turn out not to be true and then, when their fabrications or false predictions are exposed, calmly move on to concocting new claims as if they had never made the old ones?

The fact that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) hit its original goal this week of signing up more than 7 million people through its insurance exchanges ought to be a moment of truth -- literally as well as figuratively. It ought to give everyone, particularly members of the news media, pause over how reckless the opponents of change have been in making instant judgments and outlandish charges.

When the health-care Web site went haywire last fall, conservatives were absolutely certain this technological failure meant that the entire reform effort was doomed. If you doubt this, try a Google search keyed to that period relating the word "doomed" to the health-care law.

It should be said that the general public was much wiser. A CNN poll in November that at the time found a majority (54 percent to 45 percent) saying that the problems facing the law "will eventually be solved." Political moderates took this view by 55 percent to 43 percent, independents by 50 percent to 48 percent.

Only Republicans -- by a whopping 72 percent to 27 percent -- and conservatives (by 66 percent to 33 percent) thought the law could never be fixed.

Their representatives in Washington, moderate conservatives as well as the tea party's loyalists, followed the base's lead. In mid-November, for example, Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) told Fox News flatly that the law is "destined to fail," "fundamentally flawed" and "not ready for prime time."

House Speaker John Boehner predicted dire outcomes before the Web site fiasco. He repeatedly insisted, as he did in July, that "even the Obama administration knows the 'train wreck' will only get worse."

Forbes magazine posted a piece on Nov. 22 under the headline: "What to do if and when Obamacare collapses." The op-ed modestly acknowledged that "it's too soon to write an epitaph for Obamacare," but then barged forward, since "its crises are piling up so fast that one has to begin looking ahead."

So let's say it out loud: The ACA is doing exactly what its supporters said it would do. It is getting health insurance to millions who didn't have it before. (The Los Angeles Times pegged the number at 9.5 million at the beginning of the week.)

And it's working especially well in places such as Kentucky, where state officials threw themselves fully and competently behind the cause of signing up the uninsured. Those who want to repeal the law will have to admit that they are willing to deprive these people, or some large percentage of them, of insurance.

Too many conservatives would prefer not to say upfront what they really believe: They don't want the federal government to spend the significant sums of money needed to get everyone covered. Admitting this can sound cruel, so they insist that their objections are to the ACA's alleged unworkability, or to "a Washington takeover of the health system" (which makes you wonder what they think of Medicare, a far more centralized program).

Or they peddle isolated horror stories that the fact-checkers usually discover are untrue or misleading. Thus the moment of truth, about the facts.

Another Great Reason To Boycott McDonalds
By: Steve - April 11, 2014 - 9:00am

Heather Levia wanted to help some firefighters by giving them a warm meal on a cold day -- but when she showed up to work the next morning she no longer had a job.

Levia, a 23-year-old single mom with twins, works two jobs and is putting herself through nursing school.

During her morning shift as a manager at McDonald's last week, while several local fire departments worked in sub-zero temperatures to put out a house fire, Levia says she saw a way to help.

Olean firefighters ordered 25 breakfast sandwiches and hash browns, and Levia says she pulled $83 out of her pocket and paid for it herself.

"Just because I appreciate everything they do," she explained.

Then a little bit later, another department ordered $70 worth of food. Levia sent her boss a text message to see if the company would pay the tab. She thought they might because they regularly give free meals to police officers who stop by.

"It's very common in our store," she said.

But Levia's boss said no, McDonald's would not donate the food. Levia then called the corporate office and got the same answer. So once again, she and fellow workers picked up the tab.

When word spread that Levia paid the bill, some firefighters called her boss and complained, thinking the restaurant made Levia feel obligated to pay for their meals.

Levia says after that, her boss told her, "You opened a whole bee's nest."

At her next shift, after eight years of working for McDonald's, Levia was fired. She says the reason given was she swore at a superior - something she denies.

"I did say this is freaking ridiculous. But it was not implied to anybody," she said.

Allegany firefighters say they never expected free food and were grateful for the gesture.

"It was a shock. We certainly regret the fact she lost her job. We can't speak on corporate policy because we don't know the background of it," said Allegany Fire Media Officer Gordon Scott. "It was a sad affair because a gentleman lost a home. And it's even worse because we know now that this gal apparently lost her job because of it."

Levia added, "It's just wrong. I wish the communities would change and help each other out. I wish that things didn't have to be the way they are. And if losing my job is going to speak out to the community, then that's what it's going to do."

Hot Links

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Cost Of Obamacare

Bill O'Reilly Is Lying To You About Obamacare

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Electic Car Company Success

The Most Annoying Celebs Who Should Go Away

Bias Alert: O'Reilly Spins Presidential Election Media Study

O'Reilly & Fox Still Ignoring GOP Voter Registration Fraud Story

Biased O'Reilly Tells Romney To Call Obama A Socialist

O'Reilly Slams Obama With Dishonest Tip Of The Day

O'Reilly & Brit Hume Spin And Lie For Mitt Romney

Fox Promotes Ridiculous Study Of Doctors & Obamacare

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media & Obama

Low Gas Prices Shut O'Reilly & The Repiblicans Up Fast

I Am Waiting For The O'Reilly Health Care Bill Apology

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About The Media

O'Reilly Ignores MRC Calling For Sharpton Firing

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Wrong On The Deficit

O'Reilly & Fox Lie That Obama To Blame For High Gas Prices

Scientist Group Slams Celebs Like Snooki & O'Reilly

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About America

O'Reilly & Ingraham Lied About Planned Parenthood (Again)

Fox Unemployment Chart Shows Their Right-Wing Bias

U.S. Troops Burn A Box Of O'Reilly's Books

Kelly & O'Reilly Make Up Another Green Energy Scandal

O'Reilly Ignoring All The Stock Market Increases

O'Reilly Flat Out LIED About The Debt Obama Added

O'Reilly Caught Doctoring Florida Mans E-Mail

O'Reilly Ignored Michele Bachmann Church Scandal

O'Reilly & Morris Lied About The Debt Polls

O'Reilly Hypocrisy On The West/Schultz Story

The Truth About Those Bush Tax Cuts

Number Of Tea Party Events Down 50 Percent

NWLC Says O'Reilly Statement Made Up & Offensive

Video Proof O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Hack

O'Reilly Gets It Totally Wrong On Norway Terrorist

Norway Terrorist Info O'Reilly Ignored

O'Reilly Ignoring Ensign/Coburn Hush Money Scandal

O'Reilly Calls Obama Health Care Waivers A Scam

O'Reilly Complains About Losing In His Own Poll

O'Reilly Ignores Republican Hypocrisy On Judicial Filibusters

O'Reilly Ignoring Republican Unpopularity

O'Reilly Tells GOP How To Beat Obama With Scare Tactics

O'Reilly & Fox Are Lying To You About The Debt

O'Reilly Spins The 2008 Presidential Media Study

Important Tax Information Bill O'Reilly Has Ignored

O'Reilly Ignored McCain Op-Ed On Bin Laden

O'Reilly Scrubs Website & Podcast Of False Obama Claims

O'Reilly Ignored DOJ Black Panther Report

O'Reilly Still Ignoring Wisconsin Judge's Order Story

O'Reilly Ignored Jobs & Unemployment Report

Fox News Town Hall Protester Hypocrisy & Double Standards

O'Reilly & Varney Speculate About Oil Prices

O'Reilly Spins The Quinnipiac Temperature Poll

O'Reilly Proves How Stupid He Is Again

How O'Reilly Puts Out Right-Wing Propaganda

Fox News Insider Admits They Make Things Up

Luntz Admits Fox Has Anti-Obama Focus Groups

Reagan SG Says Health Care Bill Constitutional

O'Reilly Ignores Gore Answer To His Question

O'Reilly Wonders How The Moon Got There

More Republican Hate & Racism O'Reilly Has Ignored

Another Poll O'Reilly Has Totally Ignored

O'Reilly Thinks We Are Still In A Recession

O'Reilly's Nazi Comment Defense Was Laughable

O'Reilly Caught Lying About China & India

Fox News The Least Trusted Cable News Network

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media (Again)

O'Reilly Claims Estate Tax A Seizure Of Property

O'Reilly Called Bernie Sanders A Loon

Bloomberg Tax Cut Poll Proves O'Reilly Was Lying

O'Reilly Ignored Positive DADT Study & Story

O'Reilly & Fox Ignore Judge Being A 9-11 Truther

More Real News O'Reilly Has Ignored

More Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Ratings

O'Reilly Got The Ireland Economic Crisis Wrong

O'Reilly Ignored The Tom Delay Conviction Story

Women Of America: You Need To Read This

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly Is Dishonest & Crazy

O'Reilly Nazi Comparison Hypocrisy

O'Reilly Ignores New Poll While Promoting Paladino

Andrew Sullivan Called O'Reilly A Dishonest Propagandist

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Nevada RCP Senate Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Right-Wing Abortion Bomber Terrorism Story

Fox & O'Reilly Ignored Friday Pro-Mosque NY Rally

O'Reilly Busted For Health Insurance Premium Lies

Most Factor Gear Made in Vietnam And China

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

O'Reilly Busted For 1st Time Retraction Lie

The Bill O'Reilly Non-Apology Shirley Sherrod Apology

O'Reilly & The Right Are Racist Idiots

O'Reilly Ignored Tea Party Express Racism Story

O'Reilly Compares Gay People To Al-Qaeda

Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Rating Polls

O'Reilly Ignored Mark Kirk Military Award Lie Story

Where Are The Sedition Charges Now O'Reilly

O'Reilly Caught In A Massive Lie About Jail Time

O'Reilly Running Ads For Emergency Food Supply

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Tea Party Militia Links

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Gallup Tea Party Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Harris Poll Showing Republicans Are Stupid

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Health Reform Bill Tax

O'Reilly Caught Lying About NEJM Health Care Survey

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

The Truth About Ratings For News Shows

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Spin Doctor

O'Reilly Spinning Fox News Most Trusted Poll

Fox News Did Not Air Hope For Haiti Telethon

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Obama Terrorism Polls

O'Reilly Caught Lying About House Ethics Committee

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Increase

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Limbaugh Racism

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Religious Festival

O'Reilly Caught Red Handed Lying About CNN

O'Reilly Caught Violating Journalistic Standards Again

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The ACLU & Racial Profiling

More Proof O'Reilly & FOX News Do Not Tell The Truth

O'Reilly Called Bruce Springsteen Un-American & Un-Patriotic

The Bill O'Reilly Senate Torture Report Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Obama Approval Numbers

FOX News Caught Lying About Obama Budget

O'Reilly Busted For Helping GOP Smear Pelosi

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Obama Earmark Promise

Military.com Report Proves O'Reilly Wrong About Homeless Vets

O'Reilly Places 7th in 2008 Wingnut of The Year Award

O'Reilly Denys Reality About Abstinence Only Programs




Proof The O'Reilly Factor is Biased Against Barack Obama
O'Reilly said he is a non-partisan Independent, who is fair to both sides, and that he has been fair to Barack Obama. To check that claim I did a 3 month study of the Factor, it started on August 1st, 2008, and ran until October 31st, 2008. I watched the Factor every night and counted the negative and positive comments for Obama and McCain.

Visit the web page I set up, and you will see the stunning bias from O'Reilly and his mostly Republican guests against Barack Obama. Then you will see there is no doubt Bill O'Reilly is a dishonest and biased Conservative. This study is conclusive proof that O'Reilly is in the tank for John McCain.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The 3 Month Factor Bias Study:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/3mbiasnumbers.htm

Proof O'Reilly Lied About The Balance on His Show
O'Reilly claims the factor is balanced, and that he personally makes sure every week he has an equal number of Republican and Democrat guests. This is a bold faced lie, and I can prove it. I put together a web page that shows the guest list from the factor for the last 2 weeks. Read it and you will see with your own eyes that Bill O'Reilly is lying when he says the factor is balanced.

And remember that we are 3 weeks before a major Presidential election, or the Republican bias numbers would be worse than it is normally. O'Reilly is actually having more Democrats on than he usually does, and the balance is still not even close. If we were not so close to an election it would be a lot worse.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The Lies About The Factor Balance:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreillybalanced.htm

O'Reilly Sucks Investigation: Dishonesty, Deception, And Bias By Bill O'Reilly
O'Reilly claims there are no Republicans or Conservative groups that rival George Soros. O'Reilly said the top three conservative tax-exempt foundations are totally dwarfed by Soros and the radical Ford Foundation. And that they have 15 times more the assets. George Soros net worth is $8.5 billion, the Ford Foundation has a net worth of $13 billion. But the seven billionaires who donate to Newt Gingrich and other right-wing causes have a combined net worth of $34.8 billion dollars.

Somehow O'Reilly claims that Soros and the Ford Foundation have 15 times more the assets than anyone on the right. When the seven billionaires alone who give money to Newt, have roughly $14 billion more than Soros and the Ford Foundation combined.

Visit the web page below to see the massive money O'Reilly has ignored from the right:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreilly-investigation.htm

(( Right-Wing Hate Speech Ignored by Bill O'Reilly ))
O'Reilly claims there is no hate on the right, that it's all on the left. But the way he defines hate is ridiculous, if a liberal blog or website writes an article that criticizes George W. Bush (or any Republican) O'Reilly calls it hate. When it's not hate, it's reporting the facts, there is no hate. A great example is when websites like oreilly-sucks.com, mediamatters.org, etc. criticize O'Reilly he calls it hate, and says they are hate groups who lie about him.

That is a lie, it is not hate, and they are not hate websites. There is real hate on the internet, but O'Reilly does not report it, because most of it is from the right. I have documented this hate in my blog and on a web page, all of it was ignored by Bill O'Reilly, and it was never reported on the Factor.

Visit the web page below to see the massive right-wing hate O'Reilly has ignored:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/right-wing-hate.htm

O'Reilly Phone Sex Scandal Information
On October 13, 2004 FOX News producer Andrea Mackris filed a lawsuit against Bill O'Reilly.

In that lawsuit she claims he subjected her to repeated instances of sexual harassment and spoke often, and explicitly, to her about phone sex, vibrators, threesomes, masturbation, the loss of his virginity, and sexual fantasies.



After hearing of the lawsuit O'Reilly said it was all lies, that it was a shakedown for money, that he would fight it to the bitter end with no settlement, and that he would let the courts decide the matter. That was all before O'Reilly found out she had recorded his phone calls. Then Mr. I will fight her lies to the bitter end with no settlement, paid her $10 million dollars to settle the lawsuit, get the tapes, and shut her up. The out-of-court settlement came on the eve of a courtroom fight over audiotapes, reports CBS News Correspondent Kelly Cobiella.

The smokinggun.com has the entire 22 page lawsuit

www.oreilly-sucks.com Privacy Policy

Copyright 2001 - 2014


eXTReMe Tracker