Advertise Contact About This Web Site Webmaster Information
Website Info

If you are looking to buy prescription medications from Canada, then buy from a licensed Canadian pharmacy.

Check out Android Poker for the best poker links and apps. is quickly becoming the #1 source for playing online casino games for real money. Check them out

As you already know by now that Oreilly sucks and is the biggest loser. Oreilly facts apart, many people spend their time on computers playing online poker real money games as a hobby.

Get all the news and information you will ever need about sing mobile bingo at this top mobile bingo comparison site, there is no spin here, just great reviews.

Have a look at these Bally Tech Games and

Visit for US online poker related information and news.

Play online poker at the most trusted online poker room in Canada

O'Reilly Sucks
Blog Archives

January - 2012
February - 2012
March - 2012
April - 2012
May - 2012
June - 2012
July - 2012
August - 2012
September - 2012
October - 2012
November - 2012
December - 2012

January - 2013
February - 2013
March - 2013
April - 2013
May - 2013
June - 2013
July - 2013
August - 2013
September - 2013
October - 2013
November - 2013
December - 2013

January - 2014
February - 2014
March - 2014
April - 2014
May - 2014
June - 2014
July - 2014
August - 2014
September - 2014
October - 2014

Website Links

O'Reilly Info

The O'Reilly Iraq Apology Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Spins

Cable News Ratings

Read The Letter O'Reilly Had His Attorney Send me

O'Reilly Wins 2004 Misinformer of The Year Award

O'Reilly Death Penalty Lies

O'Reilly on Top 10 Conservative Idiot List 49 Times Since 2001

O'Reilly Calls Mexicans Wetbacks



O'Reilly #5 On Top 25 Right-Wing Journalist List

O'Reilly Factor Year In Review 2009

Factor Pollster Caught Writing GOP Policy Memo

What a Fair & Balanced O'Reilly Factor Would Look Like

Transcript: Bill O'Reilly v Jeremy Glick

Peabody Award Facts

Bill Clinton Enron News

Buzzflash Names O'Reilly Media Putz of The Week

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly & The Republican Party Are Both Corrupt

The Right-Wing Liberal Killer Story O'Reilly Ignored

The Facts About O'Reilly And GE Doing Business With Iran

How to Deal With an O'Reilly Factor Ambush Interview

Why FOX News Loves Juan Williams: The Strings And The Puppet

Progressive Eruptions
Rude Pundit
Prison Planet
Apocalypse Cafe
Fox News Boycott
Inebriated Discourse
Hannity Sucks
Glenn Beck Is An Idiot

The Factor Guest List Count

October 2014 (13 Shows) Republicans - 91 | Democrats - 16

The Factor Guest List Count Archives

Ratings: The O'Reilly Factor - Total Viewers

Monday - 10-13-14 -- O'Reilly - 2.744
Tuesday - 10-14-14 -- O'Reilly - 2.994
Wednesday - 10-15-14 -- O'Reilly - 2.918
Thursday - 10-16-14 -- O'Reilly - 2.918
Friday - 10-17-14 -- O'Reilly -

Weekly Factor Average -

The Cable News Ratings Archives

Oreilly is a polarizing figure and so is online gaming, especially at Begado Casino. There are advocates in Congress proposing a federal law, but Republican detractors. This, according to a supporter of Steve and, who runs a Begado Fan Blog. The conservative approach is to stick to legitimate gaming certifications and brands like Begado, says Zachary Gleason.

The O'Reilly Sucks Blog

It's Official: The Far-Right Laura Ingraham Has Lost Her Mind
By: Steve - October 20, 2014 - 10:00am

On October 17th, Laura Ingraham said this on her radio show: "The Left Believes Americans Should Die From Ebola To Repay Our Debt To Africa"

Which is just pure insanity, I am on the left and I sure as hell do not think that, and I do not know any other liberals who think that. It's ridiculous, we do not want anyone to die from Ebola (or anything else) to repay any kind of debt to Africa.

It's madness to say such a thing, and it is something you would expect a lunatic in an insane asylum to say. And it's not just insanity, it's stupid, because if Ebola does get out of control in America, it would also kill liberals, so to make the claim she did is not only crazy, it's the kind of talk you would hear from an idiot.

Nobody on the left wants that, ever. We do not want anyone to die for anything. And think about this, O'Reilly uses this lunatic as his fill-in host when he takes time off. So what does that say about O'Reilly, it says he is also a far-right nut who supports what she says, otherwise he would fire her as his fill-in host and denounce what she said. Instead, he ignores it and continues to let her host his show.

Gas Prices Fall Below $3.00 A Gallon: O'Reilly & Fox Silent
By: Steve - October 19, 2014 - 10:00am

Think back to about a year ago, gas prices were about $4.00 a gallon and the partisan hacks at Fox went wild over it. O'Reilly slammed Obama almost every night for the high gas prices, blaming him and his economic policies for the prices. Almost every host at Fox used the high gas prices to slam Obama and blame him for it.

Now we are at a point to where gas prices are below $3.00 a gallon, here in East Peoria many stations are down to $2.99 or less. And all over the country many states are seeing gas below $3.00 a gallon.

So what do we hear from O'Reilly and the partisan hacks at Fox, nothing, silence. Suddenly it is not Obama's fault for gas prices, O'Reilly never says a word about gas prices these days, he never mentions it at all.

Just as he does not say a word about Obamacare anymore, he does not say a word about low gas prices, because he can not use it as a political hammer to slam Obama anymore, so he just ignores it. He also does not report any economic news, or jobs reports, or the unemployment rate, or any economic news at all.

Because it's all good news now and he can not use it for cheap shots against the President. You would think the #1 rated show on cable news would report on the stock market, the jobs numbers, and the unemployment numbers, and you would be wrong. I watch the Factor every night and O'Reilly never reports any of it, because it would make Obama look good.

The DOW has set record high after record high over the last 6 to 9 months, and O'Reilly has not reported any of them, none, zero. But every time the DOW set a record high under Bush O'Reilly reported it every single time. And not only did O'Reilly report them under Bush, he gave Bush credit for it and even said it was a measure of how good a job Bush was doing as President.

Which O'Reilly now does not do under Obama, he ignores it, does not give Obama credit for it, and does not say it shows that Obama is doing a good job. This is called bias, flat out right-wing political bias, and yet O'Reilly claims to be fair and balanced and even says he has been fair to Obama, which is just laughable.

For the last 9 months or so the DOW has broke 16,000, then 17,000, and set record highs multiple times, and not once did O'Reilly ever report it. But as soon as the DOW has a few days where it dropped, guess what, O'Reilly reported that. Last week he had the biased hack Lou Dobbs on to discuss the short term drop in the market, while ignoring the 9 months of increases.

Folks, these are facts, I have documented it in my blog. It is 100% proof O'Reilly is a biased stooge who only reports bad news that makes Obama look bad, while ignoring all the good news that makes Obama look good. And on top of that while all this is happening O'Reilly lies to you that the whole country is in chaos and the economy is not doing better.

That is all lies from O'Reilly, because virtually every single economic measure shows we are doing much better since Obama took office in January of 2009. O'Reilly thinks that if he says it enough someone will believe him, even though the facts say the exact opposite. And somehow in his crazy mind he actually thinks he is an honest journalist who tells the truth, which in the real world is a ridiculous statement.

Why You Should Not Vote Republican In The November Elections
By: Steve - October 18, 2014 - 11:00am

One year ago today, Republicans made their strongest possible case outlining their governing principles.

Threatened by the prospect of millions of Americans securing access to quality, affordable health care, Republicans chose instead to shut down the federal government. And then waste taxpayer money (and time) voting 56 times to repeal Obamacare, even though if it did pass the Senate Obama would veto it, because it was his own bill, and it will never pass the Senate while Democrats are in the majority.

The consequences of their actions were felt across the nation. America's national parks shuttered. Children were turned away from Head Start classrooms. The National Institutes of Health was forced to reject new patients from potentially lifesaving clinical trials. More than 800,000 federal workers were furloughed.

When the reckless gamesmanship finally ended after sixteen days, the long-term consequences were apparent. The GOP shutdown cost the U.S. economy $24 billion and cut 0.3 percent of growth off the GDP. A major credit rating agency even threatened to lower the United States credit rating because of the risk that we would default on our nation's debts.

At the time, some in the Republican party claimed to have realized the error of their ways and pledged not to do it again. But with the midterm elections less than five weeks away, it is clear that Republicans have not learned their lesson.

Over the summer, Mitch McConnell admitted the GOP's plans should they win control of the Senate -- hold the American economy hostage by repeatedly threatening to shut down the government unless President Obama did exactly what they wanted.

Republican Senator Marco Rubio and Congressman Steve King also suggested that Republicans should threaten another government shutdown if President Obama acted to fix the nation's broken immigration system -- action that is supported by the majority of Americans.

It is a callous interpretation of the relationship between Congress and the president, but sadly to be expected of a Republican Party whose GOP-controlled House chose to sue the president for doing his job when they failed to do theirs.

Rather than take action that will help middle-class families or expand opportunity for all Americans, many Republicans are more interested in scoring cheap partisan political points. They are following the lead of the far-right Tea Party favorite Ted Cruz, architect of the shutdown strategy, and Rand Paul, who viewed the closing of crucial government services as a public relations fight Republicans could win.

Even Republican candidates for Senate like Bill Cassidy, Joni Ernst, David Perdue and Tom Cotton supported the shutdown and the last thing we need is more of that in Washington.

This is the choice voters will have next month when they head to the polls -- Republicans who are willing to jeopardize our economic well-being and put partisan politics ahead of the will of the people when they don't get their way, or Democrats who will work to fix our nation's problems.

Voters can see that the Democratic Party shares their priorities. They are fighting to increase the minimum wage, because no one who works full time should have to raise their family in poverty. Democrats also support paycheck fairness, because pay equity is not just a woman's issue, but a family issue and an economic issue. Republicans oppose it and vote it down every time the Democrats bring it up for a vote.

These are actions that would immediately help families make ends meet, and a far more productive use of Congress time than another destructive government shutdown, or voting to repeal Obamacare when it will never pass.

There are serious issues facing our nation that we will need to address in the years ahead. They understand that both parties have to work together. But that can't happen if Republicans decide to take their ball and go home every time things don't go the way they want.

You can agree or disagree how the country should deal with climate change, or immigration reform, or investing in our children's' future. But whether Congress fulfills its most basic functions, or whether our country meets our obligations, should never be up for debate.

Voters will head to the polls in less than five weeks. While Republicans threaten another shutdown, the best way to ensure a government that shares their priorities is to elect Democratic candidates who are willing to stick it out and fight on their behalf.

Jobless Applications Fall To 14 Year Low: O'Reilly Silent
By: Steve - October 18, 2014 - 10:00am

Jobless claims hit a 14 year low, and as usual O'Reilly never said a word about it, because it is more good economic news that makes Obama look good. O'Reilly never reports any good economic news, because he is a biased right-wing hack that does not want to give Obama any credit for it, even though under Bush he did give him credit for the good economic news.

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The number of people seeking U.S. unemployment aid dropped to the lowest level in 14 years last week, the latest sign of a strengthening labor market that could help blunt worries about the impact of weak global growth.

The Labor Department said Thursday that weekly applications for unemployment aid fell 23,000 to a seasonally adjusted 264,000, the lowest level since April 2000. Given that the U.S. population has grown considerably since then, the proportion of the U.S. workforce applying for benefits is even smaller.

Analysts cheered the unexpectedly strong data. Ian Shepherdson, chief economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, described the report as "spectacular" and "astonishing."

"Whether claims can be sustained at such a low level - an all-time low, as a share of payroll employment - is debatable....but this is a clear signal of real strength in the labor market," he said in a note to clients.

Fox Media Critic Praises Shepard Smith, Slams O'Reilly For Ebola Reporting
By: Steve - October 17, 2014 - 11:50am

Fox News media critic Howard Kurtz echoed his colleague Shepard Smith's admonishment of the media for irresponsible Ebola coverage, highlighting his own network's reporting.

Kurtz called out media figures like Fox host Bill O'Reilly, who has demanded the resignation of CDC director Tom Frieden, for reducing their response to Ebola "to a question of which heads should roll."

He contrasted coverage like O'Reilly's to that of Fox's Shepard Smith, who made headlines this week for blasting the media's "irresponsible" and "hysterical" Ebola coverage.

Smith "challenged his own profession to stop scaring people," Kurtz explained, asking, "Will the media listen?"

The Thursday 10-16-14 O'Reilly Factor Review
By: Steve - October 17, 2014 - 11:30am

The TPM was called: The Ebola Factor. The biased and dishonest Bill O'Reilly said this:
O'REILLY: As the Ebola chaos grows, no one knows how much the situation will influence politics in the USA. But there is no question it will have an impact. Some experts believe Ebola is suppressing the stock market and that will affect every American, as fear hurts the economy.

A Fox News poll asked registered voters about the direction of the country. 36% described themselves as 'hopeful,' while 61% are 'not hopeful.' And 49% respondents say the country is 'worse off' since Barack Obama became president, while 39% say 'better off.'

So the folks are blaming the president for much of the dissatisfaction. And President Obama is at fault. His leadership on many serious issues has been lacking. He made a tremendous mistake in the war on terror by pulling all U.S. troops out of Iraq. The administration has also underestimated the Muslim jihadists and has no effective strategy for containing their terror.

The president has been outfoxed by Putin, Iran and China. Here at home, the most important indicator of economic well-being, take-home pay, has fallen under the president. Democrats can spin all they want, but the cold truth is working Americans have less money in their pockets than in the past. A combination of high taxes and mediocre wages has hammered the folks. It is difficult to see any great improvements under President Obama and it will take years to figure out the benefits, if any, of Obamacare.

Now, on to Ebola. There is no question that the federal government is mishandling the situation, and again that will go right back to the White House. The point man on Ebola, CDC chief Dr. Thomas Frieden, is botching the situation big time. We've already pounded Dr. Frieden on his inexplicable opposition to suspending visa and passports from West Africa. And yesterday the man could not even explain how Ebola should be handled in public transportation.

Talking Points will help him: If you are sitting on a bus and someone next to you has Ebola and sneezes on you, you can get it. Are you understanding that Dr. Frieden? So the federal government has to keep Ebola victims out of the public arena. That means no people from the epidemic area should be admitted to the USA, something Frieden opposes but is absolutely the correct thing to do.

Not only flights, no admittance to any person holding passports from the Ebola epidemic areas. I have nothing personally against Dr. Frieden, but his performance has been awful and he has to go. The fact that the Obama administration continues to put this man in the spotlight will hurt the president of the United States.
Comment: Wow! That is mostly right-wing insanity. There is no Ebola chaos, the stock market is not down from Ebola, people always think the country is headed in the wrong direction, even under Bush, President Obama is not at fault for most of it, he had to pull the troops out of Iraq because of the SOFA agreement Bush signed, Google it, taxes have not went up, they went down, and things have greatly improved under Obama, and there is no proof if someone on a bus sneezes on you with Ebola you will get it, not to mention the odds of someone being on a bus with Ebola are almost zero.

Then James Carville and Andrea Tantaros were on to discuss the Talking Points Memo.

Tantaros said this: "You say Frieden should step down, and I understand your anger with him. But he is a doctor, he is not a crisis communications expert or a general. I don't think now is the time to switch horses. Move him out of the spotlight, but he does have valuable information. But I agree with you on the travel ban."

Carville agreed with Tantaros contention that Frieden should not be fired right now, saying this: "He's well qualified, but he's not an expert in Ebola and he's not the most effective communicator. If people are worried about getting Ebola, they should worry about something else. The chances of a significant outbreak in this country is very remote."

Then Ed Henry was on, he reported on the president's stance toward CDC boss Dr. Tom Frieden. With no Democratic guest on for balance.

Henry said this: "The administration has been saying they have full confidence in Dr. Frieden, but in recent days they have gotten the signal, especially as we get closer to the mid-term elections. There is more pressure on the president to figure out who is really in charge, and the president has canceled all of his fundraising and campaign activity. They get it that this is a huge problem and his leadership is on the line."

O'Reilly again called for a ban on travel from affected nations, saying this: "I have a spy in the White House who tells me that President Obama was furious yesterday in the Ebola meeting. The lack of a travel ban is absolutely the president's fault, you do what you can do to protect the public."

Then Bernie Goldberg was on to assess a new poll showing that most Americans feel coverage of the Ebola outbreak has been appropriate. With no Democratic guest for balance.

Goldberg said this: "The poll, like so many other things in our culture these days, has been infected with politics. If you're a fan of Barack Obama, I'm guessing that you are one of the people who say the coverage is 'sensationalized.' If you're not a fan of Barack Obama, you'll find the coverage 'appropriate.' Under this administration the CDC has been politicized - it is one of many American institutions that have been infected with politics under President Obama's administration. In a democracy like ours, certain institutions should be above politics."

Then the far-right stooge Laura Ingraham was on to talk about the war against ISIS. With no Democratic guest on for balance.

Ingraham said this: "General Dempsey says we've been making gains and he maintains that we don't need boots on the ground. However, we have a big problem right now in the town of Amiriyah Fallujah, which is 25 miles outside of Baghdad. It's reported that ISIS has besieged the town, and in Iraq the territory controlled by ISIS has not been diminished by American air strikes. So while there have been some gains in Syria, Iraq itself is very problematic."

Ingraham also said this: "We need truth-tellers in Washington, we have enough political hacks. We need to hear people and think they are really working for the betterment of America and our security."

And finally, the lame Factor tip of the day called: Disagreeing Agreeably. Billy said this: "If you disagree with someone, hold your ground without getting angry, and always try to use a little humor to defuse any tension."

Another Fox Host Tells O'Reilly He Is Wrong Over CDC Head Resigning
By: Steve - October 17, 2014 - 11:00am

First it was Greta Van Susteren telling O'Reilly he is wrong to call for the head of the CDC Dr. Tom Frieden to resign. Now it is Andrea Tantaros who is telling O'Reilly he is wrong.

Fox News Andrea Tantaros disagreed with O'Reilly Thursday night, and she went back and forth with him over it, arguing it makes no sense to switch leadership in the middle of a crisis like this.

Tantaros told O'Reilly she understands his frustrations, and "unlike some other people on this network, it is valid."

She was talking about Shepard Smith who has said the people at Fox are scaremondering over Ebola, that it is not a crisis, and not even close.

However, she went on to say, "He's a doctor, Bill, he's not a crisis communications expert, he's not a general."

She also expressed discomfort with the idea of getting rid of Frieden in the middle of this crisis. Pulling him out of the spotlight? Sure. Bringing in a more effective crisis communicator? Yes.

But Tantaros insisted, "He does have valuable information. Let him do his thing behind the scenes."

O'Reilly was having none of it, and he still argued Frieden needs to go because there's a certain performance level you have to be held to when you're dealing with life and death.

Remeber, this is coming from a cable tv news show host, who is not a doctor and does not have a clue what he is talking about. He is not an expert on anything, except being biased and yelling at people that disagree with his insane ideas.

Crazy Republican Praises Court Striking Down His Own Gerrymandering Map
By: Steve - October 17, 2014 - 10:00am

Now I have seen everything, a Republican Senate candidate in Virginia has praised the courts for striking down a gerrymandered district map he created. Yes, it is true, here is the story.

In a debate with Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) on Monday, Senate candidate Ed Gillespie (R-VA) praised a recent court decision for tossing out Virginia's racially gerrymandered congressional maps, even though the maps were the direct result of a partisan redistricting scheme he himself crafted.

Asked if he would support a bill to restore Voting Rights Act protections gutted by the U.S. Supreme Court last year, Gillespie argued that more protections are unnecessary because the courts are still able to strike down discriminatory laws like Virginia's.

"We saw here just recently in Virginia that civil rights and the Voting Rights Act is being enforced. We have had our district lines overturned by the courts and it is one of the reasons why the federal court is so important," Gillespie said, as he changed the subject to attack Warner on a nepotism scandal.

The problem is, Gillespie was a key architect in Republicans gerrymandering effort that led to the Virginia maps in the first place.

Shortly after Gillespie became the chair of the Republican State Leadership Committee (RSLC) in 2010, the group launched a major push to redistrict state legislative maps to favor Republicans, called the Redistricting Majority Project, or REDMAP.

The RSLC raised more than $30 million to pack state legislatures with Republicans who would approve maps to lock in Republican seats for the next decade.

The now invalidated Virginia maps, which were approved after Republicans took control of the state Senate, are considered one of the most aggressive racial gerrymanders in the nation.

The maps consolidated several disparate African American communities into one awkwardly shaped district, effectively making it so black voters would not impact other districts. In other words, the Republicans drew up these racist distract maps to block all the blacks from voting against Republicans, so they would all win with all white votes.

The legislature must now redraw more equitably distributed maps by April.

Despite the setback in Virginia, Gillespie's national Republican gerrymander plan has achieved its goal, costing Democrats 1.7 million votes in seven states in the 2012 election.

Jon Stewart Fails To Get Crazy O'Reilly To Admit There Is White Privilege
By: Steve - October 16, 2014 - 11:00am

Jon Stewart and Bill O'Reilly got together again Wednesday night for an intense debate about white privilege that came very close to turning into a shouting match.

A few months ago, O'Reilly had dismissed the idea of "white privilege" as a fantasy, and Stewart challenged him on that, practically starting the interview saying "I want you to admit that there is such a thing as white privilege."

O'Reilly stuck to his insane argument about Asians doing well, therefore maybe Asian privilege exists, but Stewart argued "white males set the system."

Not to mention, Asians doing well has nothing to do with racism against black people, it's a stupid argument that does not make sense.

O'Reilly shot back it's ridiculous because there's "no more slavery, no more Jim Crow," and the president is black.

Which also makes no sense, just because slavery is over and a black man is in the White House does not mean racism is over, unless you are braindead.

Stewart argued the residual effects still exist today. And he is exactly right, when a white man walks into a bank to get a loan he has white advantage before the loan agent even talks to him. Not to mention, it was proven that blacks are denied more home loans than whites, even though they had the same financial situations.

Things got really heated and O'Reilly and Stewart were practically yelling at each other at one point. Stewart asked him at one point, "Why so defensive about it?"

O'Reilly is a fool and his argument about white privilege is laughable, and he might just be the only white person left in America who still claims there is no white privilege, it's ridiculous to even deny it.

Van Susteren Says O'Reilly Wrong To Call For CDC Director To Resign
By: Steve - October 16, 2014 - 10:00am

Bill O’Reilly got really mad Monday night at CDC Director Tom Frieden and called on him to resign. But today his colleague Greta Van Susteren defended Frieden and said O'Reilly was "dead wrong" in his commentary.

O'Reilly spent a great deal of time last night calling Frieden a "propagandist" who needs to go immediately.

Van Susteren said this: "I disagree totally with him, I think Dr. Frieden has done a good job, and you know, I want him to continue to lead this."

Her guest, Dr. Anthony Fauci, agreed, saying people need to realize how difficult a situation this is.

Van Susteren ended things by saying, "I think Bill O'Reilly's dead wrong on this one."

And of course O'Reilly never mentioned any of that on his Tuesday night show, he ignored it ,while saying only liberals disagree with him, when one of his own right-wing Fox hosts also disagree with him.

Shepard Smith Slams Media For Irresponsible Ebola Coverage
By: Steve - October 15, 2014 - 11:30am

He said the media Ebola coverage is Hysterical and Irresponsible. Smith also said this: "These Are The Facts -- We Do Not Have An Outbreak Of Ebola In The United States. Nowhere."

Maybe someone should tell him that O'Reilly is the worst about it, but notice he says nothing about O'Reilly. And everyone else on his own network is being ridiculous about it too. If you ask O'Reilly and the other Fox stooges it's chaos, and a crisis. Even though that is ridiculous and we only have two cases here in the USA.

The Tuesday 10-14-14 O'Reilly Factor Review
By: Steve - October 15, 2014 - 11:00am

The TPM was called: The Latest on the Ebola Debacle. The biased and dishonest Bill O'Reilly said this:
O'REILLY: All over the country Americans are worried about the Ebola virus. The danger is clear, but somewhat exaggerated - there is no threat of an Ebola epidemic in the USA right now. But what is not exaggerated is the dishonesty of the federal government. We have called for the head of the CDC, Dr. Thomas Frieden, to resign because he has not been telling us the full story about how Ebola is spreading and how it can be contained.

The biggest fabrication is that stopping West Africans from coming to the USA would somehow diminish the world's ability to fight Ebola in Africa. That is flat out false. A new ABC News/Washington Post poll asks, 'Would you support restricting entry to the United States by people who have been in affected countries?' A whopping 67% support the travel ban, just 29% percent are opposed.

That scientific poll mirrors our poll, where just 3% say the government is doing enough to protect Americans from Ebola, while 97% say it is not. People all over the world are getting more concerned. The World Health Organization estimates that up to 10,000 new Ebola cases a week in Africa could happen within the next few months.

Here in the USA, a Dallas nurse, who contracted the disease from Liberian Thomas Duncan, has received a blood transfusion from an Ebola survivor. And in Nebraska, Ashoka Mukpo continues to fight for his life after he contracted Ebola in Africa while working for NBC News. The world should be trying to help stop the epidemic in West Africa, but that will be a long process.

Preventing West Africans from entering the USA could happen today, but the Obama administration continues to dither and the CDC continues to put out false information. Therefore, concern in America continues to grow.
Comment: And that is just ridiculous nonsense, read my other blog post below for details on why O'Reilly is wrong. Remember that Greta Van Susteren has also said O'Reilly is wrong, but he never mentions that.

Then a Fox News medical contributor Manny Alvarez was on, who has also called for Dr. Frieden to resign.

Alvarez said this: "The CDC said that everything would be under control, but everything is not under control. We have patients coming over here and one case in Dallas has created chaos. We are not equipped to handle Ebola patients! The federal government has the right to stop anybody coming to this country if they feel they have an infectious problem. We need a General Patton-like doctor at the CDC, not another bureaucrat."

But Dr. Amesh Adalja, a specialist in infectious disease, argued that a travel ban is unwarranted and illegal, saying this: "There is a treaty that binds countries together to fight outbreaks, and as part of that treaty you are not allowed to enact travel bans. They have been tried in every historical outbreak but they don't work. Ebola is a disease that is containable if you do the right things."

Comment: This Fox stooge Alvarez is an idiot, he claims it is not under control, which is a lie, because it is under control and we have only had TWO cases in the USA, how the hell is that out of control?

Then Monica Crowley and Kirsten Powers were on to talk about the Ebola situation.

Powers basically said O'Reilly is hysterical, saying this: "I'm not going to call you hysterical, but it's bordering on hysterical. We have to remember that we have a different system in the United States than in Liberia and the way you are talking about this is overblown. The idea that we should be shutting down flights is wrong, it's a hysterical reaction."

Crowley of course agreed with O'Reilly, saying this: "People in the last century were quarantined at Ellis Island when they had a serious illness. There is nothing wrong with doing that when we are dealing with a virus that is this exotic and this deadly. We can't control our border, but we can shut down flights from West Africa."

Then Meghan McCain, Senator John McCain's daughter was on.

McCain said this: "I completely agree with my father. Everything he and Senator Lindsey Graham said would happen in the Middle East when we left Iraq has happened, and I'm absolutely petrified about what's going on in the Middle East right now. When the American people see what's going on and how brutal ISIS is, there is no other option. We must deal with it."

Then John Stossel was on, he claims that the federal government continually violates the Constitution, while saying nothing about the Republicans who violate the constitution.

Stossel said this: "This country works because of what Jefferson wrote in the Constitution. The powers rest with the people and we should be wary of giving government too much power. That built the most prosperous country in the world, but now presidents and Congress say it doesn't matter, we can do anything we want. What gives them the right to pass marijuana laws, what gives them the right to ignore the Second Amendment? And Congress is supposed to declare war. If bombing people is a good idea, Congress ought to approve it."

Then Lis Wiehl and Kimberly Guilfoyle were on to talk about the case of Thomas Duncan, the Liberian citizen who died from Ebola in Dallas. His relatives are now threatening to sue the hospital where he died.

Wiehl said this: "In Texas they make it very hard to sue a hospital for medical malpractice. You have to show gross negligence, not just negligence. You would have to show that they knew he had Ebola before sending him home."

Guilfoyle said this: "They're very strict against this type of plaintiff lawsuit in Texas, you have to show willful and wanton disregard. The family could bring a federal civil rights case, but that would also fail."

Comment: O'Reilly also admitted they did not treat him because he did not have any money, or health insurance, and that he was from a foreign country.

Then Charles Krauthammer was on to slam Susan Rice, who on Sunday claimed that Turkey is committed to the fight against ISIS, which the Turkish government promptly denied. And as usual no Democratic guest was on for balance.

Krauthammer said this: "I have some advice for Susan Rice. She could be an international strategist of Kissengerian proportions, but she should not go on television, it just doesn't work. It is totally inexplicable that the National Security Adviser, whose job is to be the conduit of all information coming from the various foreign policy agencies, should go on television and announce to the world this very crucial agreement. And then, within hours, the Turks say it's not true. It is a monumental mistake, and that it should happen in the middle of a war is truly remarkable."

And finally, the lame Factor tip of the day that was once again not a tip, just O'Reilly promoting an interview another Fox host did.

67% Say They Support Restricting Entry From Countries With Ebola
By: Steve - October 15, 2014 - 10:00am

A new poll from the Washington Post and ABC News shows 67 percent of people say they would support restricting entry to the United States from countries struggling with Ebola. Another 91 percent would like to see stricter screening procedures at U.S. airports in response to the disease's spread.

Thus far, some countries in Europe have restricted flights from these countries in West Africa, and an increasing number of U.S. lawmakers are calling for similar bans. The White House has yet to increase restrictions, with federal officials saying such a move could actually increase the spread of the disease by hampering the movement of aid workers and supplies.

So O'Reilly used the poll results on his Tuesday night show, to argue he is right, and that we should block everyone from African countries from entering the USA.

Without telling you that O'Reilly, everyone else at Fox, and the rest of the media has been putting out propaganda on Ebola and scaring everyone with nonsense. I can not even turn a news show on without hearing about Ebola, it's everywhere, on Fox, MSNBC, and CNN. They are almost reporting it 24/7, so of course people are scared.

And if the media reported that monkeys could now fly 24/7 for 2 weeks, 67% of the people would most likely believe that too.

It's ridiculous, and here are the facts. ONE guy with Ebola got into the USA, and he got in illegally by lying to people at the airport. I repeat, ONE guy with Ebola got into the USA.

Then a nurse who treated him also got Ebola, because she violated protocol when she did it. And now she is doing fine, and responding to treatment.

So we had ONE actual case of Ebola, and TWO total cases of Ebola, TWO!

And one of them was a nurse who treated the ONE guy who had Ebola. It's not like we have 100 cases of Ebola, or 200, or 300, or 500, or 1000. There was ONE case of Ebola, ONE!

Now think about this too, another Pew poll from last week showed that only 11 percent were "very worried" about themselves or their families becoming infected.

But O'Reilly does not report that, not a word, he just keeps fearmongering that Ebola is a crisis and that 67% want African people blocked from entering the USA.

This is all nonsense, remember back to 2009 when we had the H1N1 virus scare. Also called the swine flu, in October 2009 polls showed that 52 percent were "very worried" then, and the crisis never happened.

In 2006 the Avian influenza scare hit, also called the bird flu, in 2006 (41 percent) and slightly higher than concern about Sudden Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2003.

People were scared about all of it, because the media scared everyone for no reason, and it all went away to be never heard about again. We went from Sars, to the bird flu, to the swine flu, and now it's Ebola.

Every time someone gets sick O'Reilly and the media flip out and scare everyone for no reason. And now they are doing it again with Ebola, over ONE fricking case, ONE!

The Monday 10-13-14 O'Reilly Factor Review
By: Steve - October 14, 2014 - 11:00am

The TPM was called: Why the Federal Government is Not Protecting America. The biased and dishonest Bill O'Reilly said this:
O'REILLY: With a second Ebola case in Dallas, Americans are concerned that their government will not protect them against this very contagious disease. 26-year-old Nina Pham, a nurse who treated Thomas Duncan - the Liberian who died from Ebola last week - has been diagnosed with the disease, even though she was apparently wearing protective gear.

A new poll asked whether there should there be a ban on flights from West African countries into the USA? 58% said yes, 20% no. Talking Points has said that there is no compelling reason why West Africans should be admitted to the USA. This is a national security issue, is it not? We have asked Dr. Thomas Frieden of the Centers for Disease Control to appear a number of times. He has declined, and I believe it's because he knows that I know he's not being candid.

Nobody is calling for charter flights to be banned, so medical assistance and military personnel could get to the affected areas in Africa. Talking Points is just asking for common sense, which the Obama administration is rejecting. Now, onto the ISIS threat. Reports out of Syria and Iraq say U.S. bombing is doing some damage to these terrorists, but is not stopping their advance.

All of us who see things clearly knew that was going to be the case. I believe President Obama knew that was going to be the case but would not tell the American people. Instead, the president has created a mythology that somehow a 60-nation coalition that is basically doing nothing is going to defeat ISIS.

The Turkish army is one mile away from the terrorists watching them slaughter civilians and doing nothing. Great coalition, Mr. President! The American people are not being told the whole truth by the Obama administration about two very important situations. The B.S. has to stop.
Comment: Okay, now this is getting ridiculous. O'Reilly now claims the federal government is not protecting America, over 2 cases of Ebola, and one was a nurse who treated the guy with Ebola, give me a break. This is 100% proof O'Reilly is a biased right-wing hack, because nothing but a partisan political fool would say such a crazy thing.

Then Mary K. Ham and Juan Williams were on to discuss it. Who both work for Fox and agreed with O'Reilly, making them all scaremongering fools.

Williams said this: "I am very troubled with what is happening in Dallas, and I don't understand why we are not being told what is going on. When it comes to Dr. Frieden, accountability is key for our officials. But my question to you is, who is on the bench, who have we heard from in the medical community who says Frieden is wrong?"

Ham said this: "It's important not to panic, but it's perfectly rational as an American to look at this situation and point out that President Obama and many other people said there were screening processes in place. In the past year, the NIH and CDC have grossly mishandled anthrax, bird flu, and smallpox, so I don't have the utmost confidence that what they're saying is the truth."

Then Brit Hume was on to talk about the Ebola situation and the government's reaction.

Hume said this: "I don't think we've been leveled with on Ebola or ISIS. I'm more concerned that Tom Frieden doesn't know the truth about Ebola, I think he was genuinely surprised that the nurse got infected even though she was wearing protective gear. What's happening here is that we keep getting these surprises. This is still relatively small, but it's frightening."

Then Karl Rove was on with one of his regular updates on the battle for control of the Senate. With no Democratic guest for balance, and O'Reilly never once disclosed that Rove has two PAC's that have spent millions and millions on the very same races he is reporting on. Which is a massive conflict of interest, and yet O'Reilly says nothing about it.

Rove said this: "Ebola adds to a growing concern about security, and ISIS has been a driver in public opinion. National security and terrorism has risen to the number two concern in most polls, and Ebola adds to those concerns. This will be more of an issue when there is a direct connection between a candidate and either one of those two issues. If you have a Republican candidate who has some credentials to talk about this and a Democrat that has a weakness, then it will become more salient."

O'Reilly reminded Rove that Republicans are not a sure bet to win a Senate majority, saying this: "You are saying that the whole atmosphere points to Republicans doing well, yet many of the races are still very tight."

Comment: And let us not forget that Rove was totally wrong with his political predictions in the last election, so he is biased and sometimes very wrong. O'Reilly never once pointed that out.

Then Jesse Watters was on to talk about Columbus Day? He asked some people about Christopher Columbus and his historic voyages to the New World.

Here are a few of their observations about Columbus: "He discovered something, I don't know what" ... "He conquered America, I think" ... "He was Hispanic" ... "He came over on the Mayflower."

O'Reilly then advised Watters to dig deeper next time, saying this: "We need to know if these people actually went to school and graduated. I want their resumes, because most people watching this program think this is phony."

Comment: Earth to Bill O'Reilly, you are an out of touch moron. Because most people do not care about history, they care about jobs and making enough money to pay the bills.

And finally, the lame Factor tip of the day called: Ride Out The Storm. Billy said this: "Just about anything can happen when you travel, including an unexpected storm like the one that smacked Bermuda last weekend, so just stay calm and roll with the proverbial punches."

Fox Calls For Czar After Saying Obama Czars Turing Us Into Russia
By: Steve - October 14, 2014 - 10:00am

This is a classic double standard and hypocrisy from the stooges at Fox, when Obama was appointing Czars to head different Government agencies Fox flipped out and said he is turning the USA into Russia, they had segment after segment about it on all the Fox shows, including the O'Reilly Factor, they even had a graphic on one show with the appointees dressed as Russian Czars.

After spending much of 2009 complaining that President Obama's appointment of "czars" was akin to the crowning of monarchs and Russian practices, Fox & Friends is now calling for the appointment of an Ebola Virus czar.

Fox host Steve Doocy responded to news of the first Ebola diagnosis contracted within the U.S. by calling for an "official Ebola czar" on the October 13 edition of Fox & Friends, echoing the demand of Republican Sen. John McCain.

According to Doocy, "We probably need one" because Obama isn't doing enough to fight the virus:
DOOCY: So every time there's an incident like this, you see Thomas Frieden, the guy who heads up CDC, but is he the official -- there he is right there -- Is he the official Ebola czar? We probably need one, because the president isn't, you know, he's not --

KILMEADE: Sen. McCaul is calling for one.

DOOCY: Absolutely. So with all this bad news --

KILMEADE: Congressman McCaul.

DOOCY: Where was the President of the United States over the weekend? Right after he talked to the Secretary of Health and Human Services, he went golfing.
So when Obama does it he is a commie fool that is turning the USA into Russia, but when McCain and some Fox stooges call for it then it's suddenly a great thing. That's how it works at Fox, because they are biased right-wing hacks.

And they have a long history of mocking previous Obama administration czars.

Co-Host Gretchen Carlson mocked the term and alleged, "You know when I looked up 'czar' in the dictionary, or Googled it, the word that came up was 'king.' And I was wondering to myself, why we are having so many czars/kings now in America?"

Doocy added, "When you think about it, 'czar' is a Russian word."

Fox then aired a made up graphic of Obama's cabinet members in Russian czar attire displaying the question, "And Now We're Russia?" Doocy went on to compare administration cabinet members to Russian monarchs.

The same year, Carlson asked whether czars in the Obama administration were "just friends of Obama who need work or payback a favor?", while Kilmeade previously questioned whether the appointment of a czar was evidence "of a new culture of corruption."

And if Obama does say he is going to appoint an Ebola Czar, you can bet Fox will change their tune and slam him for it. So they oppose things when it is an Obama idea, then support the very same thing when it is a Republican idea.

Crazy Mike Huckabee Refuses To Admit The Gay Marriage Debate Is Over
By: Steve - October 13, 2014 - 10:00am

Now this is just funny, a Republican (Mike Huckabee) who claims to support the constitution 100 percent, is now saying that even though the courts have ruled gay marriage bans are unconstitutional, he still wants the Republican party to fight it. He even says he might quit the party if they do not continue to fight it, even though they did fight it, and they lost.

I say good, quit you ignorant bigoted fool. In fact, I say you should quit everything, your job, all of it, and get lost. You are a fool that should leave public life, go away.

Here is the story: Fox News host Mike Huckabee advised Republicans to "grow a spine" and oppose marriage equality, blasting court rulings overturning same-sex marriage bans as "the betrayal of our Constitution."

During an October 7th interview with the anti-gay American Family Association's radio program, Huckabee said that he's "utterly exasperation with Republicans, who have abdicated on this issue," and warned that he might leave the Republican Party and become an independent if the GOP stops fighting marriage equality.

The former governor of Arkansas is reportedly considering a run for president in 2016.

Huckabee reiterated his criticism in the opening monologue of his October 11th Fox News show. Huckabee denounced the court decisions that led to same-sex marriage becoming legal in several more states, emphasizing that judges overruled "the collective votes of the people themselves" in a "betrayal of our Constitution."

Comment: Earth to idiot, just because the majority of people vote for something, does not mean it is ok and legal. Remember the majority of Americans once support child labor and slavery, but now we dont. The constitution says everyone has equal rights, and if you infringe on those rights it is a violation of the constitution.

He concluded that he is "utterly disgusted" with Republican governors and other officials that complied with the court orders overturning same-sex marriage bans, arguing that they should "grow a spine, show a modicum of knowledge about the way we govern ourselves, and lead, follow, or get the heck out of the way."

Huckabee said this:
HUCKABEE: I wonder sometimes, do we still teach civics in school? Are Americans, even elected officials, lawyers, and judges, utterly ignorant about the structure of our government and how it functions?

Look, I assume that everyone knows that we've got three branches of government and each are equal to the other. The founders took extraordinary measures to prevent too much power being grabbed by one person or group. The system they created, sometimes cumbersome, but it's based on the longest-used constitution in human history.

The Congress controls the purse, or the money, the executive branch controls the sword, and the judicial watches over and offers opinions as to the constitutional compliance of the other two.

My friend Matt Staver of the Liberty Counsel and dean at the Liberty University School of Law points out in his outstanding book called Judicial Tyranny -- and he says this, and I quote: "The Bill of Rights is designed to protect the liberties of the minority against the majority. However, our constitutional make-up does not give the minority veto rights over the majority.

The major political and social questions of our day has by constitutional design been given to the majority through the legislative process. Continually taking away the right of the majority to shape their culture will ultimately result in rebellion. To take away the right of the people to debate the question leads to an oligarchy, or government of the few, and it results in tyranny," end quote.

Well this week the Supreme Court declined to take up cases from the court of appeals regarding same-sex marriage in a number of states where the people had already voted to affirm natural law marriage of a man and a woman. In these states, typically, a single robed judge decided that his opinion mattered more than the collective votes of the people themselves.

The Supreme Court refused to hear these cases, despite confusion the exists due to its own Windsor decision last year which struck down the Defense of Marriage Act.

Several governors and other elected officials reacted by saying, "Well, that's it. That's the final word." Horse apples. The Supreme Court is not the supreme being. Yes, it's the highest court within one of the three branches of government, but it isn't superior to the other two. In recent years, the doctrine of judicial supremacy has trampled both the Constitution and common sense.

The Court can certainly rule on an issue, but unless the legislature passes enabling legislation and funds it, and unless the executive branch signs it and enforces it, it certainly is not the law of the land. That's often exclaimed with authority by voices that belong to people I wonder, did they pass ninth grade civics?

The law of the land requires agreement of all three branches.

Now this is not just same-sex marriage which, frankly, I disagree with. I by the way hold the same view that President Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden held just until two years ago, that it was inconsistent with nature and nature's law. But the biggest issue is the betrayal of our Constitution and the surrender to a small group of unelected black-robed jurists who can't make law, nor enforce it.

Now, if you believe that men should marry men and women should marry women, then get the people's representatives to vote for it, the chief executive to sign it, and then have the courts agree with it. I'm utterly disgusted with fellow Republicans who want to walk away from the issue of judicial supremacy just because it's politically volatile.

Here is my advice: Grow a spine, show a modicum of knowledge about the way we govern ourselves, and lead, follow, or get the heck out of the way.
Comment: And here is my advice to Mike Huckabee. Stop now, you are making a fool of yourself and proving you are a bigot who does not care about a persons rights, all you care about is partisan ideology and religion that tells you it is wrong for gay people to marry.

You are wrong, you are a fool, and you are a prime example of why most gay people do not vote for Republicans. Just think about this, if you guys stopped being racist against blacks, and stopped being biased against gay people, you would win more elections.

Obama Calls For Congress To Raise Minimum Wage To $10.10 An Hour
By: Steve - October 12, 2014 - 10:00am

In this week's address, the President made the case for why it's past time to raise the minimum wage. Increasing the national minimum wage to $10.10 an hour would benefit 28 million Americans, and make our economy stronger.

While Republicans in Congress have blocked this commonsense proposal, a large and growing coalition of state and local leaders and owners of businesses large and small have answered the President's call and raised wages for their residents and employees on their own.

This progress is important, but there is more that can be done. No American who works full time should have to raise a family in poverty.

Obama said this:

Ask yourself: could you live on $14,500 a year? That's what someone working full-time on the minimum wage makes. If they're raising kids, that's below the poverty line. And that's not right. A hard day's work deserves a fair day's pay.

Right now, a worker on the federal minimum wage earns $7.25 an hour. It's time to raise that to $10.10 an hour.

Raising the federal minimum wage to ten dollars and ten cents an hour, or ten-ten, would benefit 28 million American workers. 28 million. And these aren't just high schoolers on their first job. The average worker who would benefit is 35 years old.

Most low-wage workers are women. And that extra money would help them pay the bills and provide for their families. It also means they'll have more money to spend at local businesses - which grows the economy for everyone.

But Congress hasn't voted to raise the minimum wage in seven years. Seven years. And when it got a vote earlier this year, Republicans flat-out voted "no."

That's why, since the first time I asked Congress to give America a raise, 13 states, 21 cities and D.C. have gone around Congress to raise their workers' wages. Five more states have minimum wage initiatives on the ballot next month.

More companies are choosing to raise their workers' wages. A recent survey shows that a majority of small business owners support a gradual increase to ten-ten an hour, too. And I've done what I can on my own by requiring federal contractors to pay their workers at least ten-ten an hour.

On Friday, a coalition of citizens - including business leaders, working moms, labor unions, and more than 65 mayors - told Republicans in Congress to stop blocking a raise for millions of hard-working Americans.

Because we believe that in America, nobody who works full-time should ever have to raise a family in poverty. And I'm going to keep up this fight until we win. Because America deserves a raise right now. And America should forever be a place where your hard work is rewarded.

Comment: And for the record, Bill O'Reilly has said he supports raising the minimum wage, he just never talks about it or has people on who support it, because most his viewers are right-wing stooges that oppose it and do not want to see O'Reilly talk about it or have people on that support it.

Republican Governor Scott Walker Claims $7.25 An Hour Is A Living Wage
By: Steve - October 11, 2014 - 10:00am

In September, 100 workers filed a complaint with the administration of Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) claiming that the minimum wage is so low that it violates a state statute. On Monday, Walker's administration rejected the complaint without contacting any of the workers.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel is reporting that Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker is refusing to raise the minimum wage despite an attempt Wisconsin Jobs Now "to use a little-known clause in state law to raise the state minimum wage of $7.25 an hour or at least force Walker, a Republican, to publicly oppose such a move just a month before the Nov. 4 election."

The problem for Wisconsin workers is that though Wisconsin law says the minimum wage "shall not be less than a living wage" (and the current wage of $7.25/hr clearly is) the governor, as the Journal Sentinel tells us, "is also allowed to consider the effect that increasing the minimum wage would have on the overall state economy and on the availability of entry-level jobs."

Dodging a minimum wage hike required only that the state Department of Workforce Development to say "The department has determined that there is no reasonable cause to believe that the wages paid to the complainants are not a living wage."

Wisconsin Jobs Now pointed out in response:
Governor Walker might be the only person in the entire country who actually thinks that anyone in today's economy can survive solely on $7.25 an hour. His political stance against raising minimum wage is one thing.

But for the governor to brazenly say to the working families of Wisconsin that $7.25 an hour is definitely enough to sustain themselves is not only misguided, it is incredibly ignorant.

The law in Wisconsin is very clear: 'every wage paid by any employer to any employee shall not be less than a living wage.'

Anyone who works a full and honest day's work should make enough money to pay for the basics. The fact that Governor Walker thinks that $290 a week is what it costs to cover the basics of life in Wisconsin is beyond comprehension.

This decision makes it unequivocally clear that Scott Walker is more than out of touch: he is brutally neglectful of a huge percentage of his constituents.
The governor’s spokesperson Laurel Patrick proved that talk is cheap when she claimed that Walker wanted jobs that pay "two or three times the minimum wage" and that "He is focused on finding ways to help employers create jobs that pay far more than the minimum wage or any other proposed minimum."

He was also supposed to be finding ways to create 250,000 jobs over the past four years. You might remember his Tea Party mantra, that he would "get government out of the way of employers.....who will then help Wisconsin create 250,000 jobs by 2015, and as we create those new jobs, we will be able to add 10,000 new businesses."

But of course, that never happened. According to, promise broken. Politifact tells us that "Our tally now stands at 102,195 jobs -- or about 40 percent of what Walker promised.

Monday, the Department of Workforce Development's (DWD) Equal Rights Division Administrator Robert Rodriguez responded in a letter, saying, "The Department has determined that there is no reasonable cause to believe that the wages paid to the complainants are not a living wage."

In a press release, the department says it reviewed the documents submitted in the complaint and found, "Most of the statements list wages that are in excess of the current minimum wage – as high as $15.07 an hour. Many of the statements reference items that go beyond basic necessities; others cite receiving public aid or additional sources of income."

It added, "Conversely, several studies that have been widely reported on point to significant job losses as a result of an increase in the minimum wage."

While the investigation reviewed the documents, it didn't reach out to any of the workers to talk to them about their wages. In other words, they did not ask anyone making $7.25 an hour if they can live on that money, because as they know the answer would be no.

In a response to the DWD's announcement, Wisconsin Jobs Now said, "To issue this determination without even so much as a follow-up phone call to question or clarify any of the 100 Wisconsin workers who filed complaints is not only appalling, it is irresponsible."

The minimum wage used to be able to keep a family of two or three out of poverty, but $7.25 an hour today won't even keep a single parent above that line.

While higher wages are certainly better, even a $15 an hour wage will add up to just $31,200 a year. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology calculates that a living wage for the state's capitol of Madison, for example, would have to be $21.17 an hour for a single parent.

Most Of The 10 Worst States To Live In Are Controlled By Republicans
By: Steve - October 10, 2014 - 11:00am

Here is something you will never see reported by O'Reilly, a new study shows that seven of the ten worst states to live in are completely controlled by Republicans, and nine of the ten states voted for Mitt Romney in 2012.

Here is the list:

10). Georgia
9). New Mexico
8). Louisiana
7). South Carolina
6). Oklahoma
5). Tennessee
4). West Virginia
3). Arkansas
2). Alabama
1). Mississippi

New Mexico is the lone state on the list that went for Obama in 2008. Seven of the ten states have Republican governors and Republican controlled state legislatures.

Only one state on the list features a Democratic governor and a Democratic state legislature (West Virginia).

In New Mexico, Democrats control the state House while Republicans control the Senate senate and governor. Arkansas has a Democratic governor, but a Republican controlled legislature.

The Republican controlled states on the list feature lower disposable income rates, low voter turnout rates, and high homicide rates. It is ironic that Republicans always campaign on being tough on crime, but their economic policies tend to lead to more poverty and crime.

It is logical that states controlled by a political party that believes in redistributing wealth to the rich would have widespread poverty, but it is the devastating consequences of these policies on the quality of life for the people who live there that get often overlooked.

These states aren't just poor. They are difficult places to live in. Existence in these red states is more difficult that it is in places that feature more income and less crime. When ideology is turned into policy, it will have a real, and devastating impact.

This data should be an eye opener for the majority of voters in these states, but many of these residents have been voting against their own self-interest for decades.

Proof that this behavior is bad for their health isn't going to change their Republican voting ways anytime soon.

Hot Links

4 Fox Hosts Slam O'Reilly Over His Ebola Reporting

Historians & The Patton Family Rip O'Reilly's New Patton Book

Jon Stewart Slams Fox For Criticizing President While At War

Facts On The Economy Bill O'Reily Is Totally Ignoring

Under Bush O'Reilly & Fox News Did Not Blame Him For Beheadings

Study Finds Fox News Only Tells the Truth 18% of the Time

More Republican Corruption O'Reilly Has Ignored

Jon Stewart Destroys O'Reilly & Fox For Ferguson Shooting Bias

O'Reilly Caught Lying About ISIS Threat & Juan Williams

NY Times Charles Blow Says Bill O'Reilly Is The Race Hustler

Homeland Security Shows Gutfeld & Baker Are Liars

More Republican Corruption O'Reilly Has Ignored

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Cost Of Obamacare

Bill O'Reilly Is Lying To You About Obamacare

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Electic Car Company Success

The Most Annoying Celebs Who Should Go Away

Bias Alert: O'Reilly Spins Presidential Election Media Study

O'Reilly & Fox Still Ignoring GOP Voter Registration Fraud Story

Biased O'Reilly Tells Romney To Call Obama A Socialist

O'Reilly Slams Obama With Dishonest Tip Of The Day

O'Reilly & Brit Hume Spin And Lie For Mitt Romney

Fox Promotes Ridiculous Study Of Doctors & Obamacare

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media & Obama

Low Gas Prices Shut O'Reilly & The Repiblicans Up Fast

I Am Waiting For The O'Reilly Health Care Bill Apology

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About The Media

O'Reilly Ignores MRC Calling For Sharpton Firing

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Wrong On The Deficit

O'Reilly & Fox Lie That Obama To Blame For High Gas Prices

Scientist Group Slams Celebs Like Snooki & O'Reilly

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About America

O'Reilly & Ingraham Lied About Planned Parenthood (Again)

Fox Unemployment Chart Shows Their Right-Wing Bias

U.S. Troops Burn A Box Of O'Reilly's Books

Kelly & O'Reilly Make Up Another Green Energy Scandal

O'Reilly Ignoring All The Stock Market Increases

O'Reilly Flat Out LIED About The Debt Obama Added

O'Reilly Caught Doctoring Florida Mans E-Mail

O'Reilly Ignored Michele Bachmann Church Scandal

O'Reilly & Morris Lied About The Debt Polls

O'Reilly Hypocrisy On The West/Schultz Story

The Truth About Those Bush Tax Cuts

Number Of Tea Party Events Down 50 Percent

NWLC Says O'Reilly Statement Made Up & Offensive

Video Proof O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Hack

O'Reilly Gets It Totally Wrong On Norway Terrorist

Norway Terrorist Info O'Reilly Ignored

O'Reilly Ignoring Ensign/Coburn Hush Money Scandal

O'Reilly Calls Obama Health Care Waivers A Scam

O'Reilly Complains About Losing In His Own Poll

O'Reilly Ignores Republican Hypocrisy On Judicial Filibusters

O'Reilly Ignoring Republican Unpopularity

O'Reilly Tells GOP How To Beat Obama With Scare Tactics

O'Reilly & Fox Are Lying To You About The Debt

O'Reilly Spins The 2008 Presidential Media Study

Important Tax Information Bill O'Reilly Has Ignored

O'Reilly Ignored McCain Op-Ed On Bin Laden

O'Reilly Scrubs Website & Podcast Of False Obama Claims

O'Reilly Ignored DOJ Black Panther Report

O'Reilly Still Ignoring Wisconsin Judge's Order Story

O'Reilly Ignored Jobs & Unemployment Report

Fox News Town Hall Protester Hypocrisy & Double Standards

O'Reilly & Varney Speculate About Oil Prices

O'Reilly Spins The Quinnipiac Temperature Poll

O'Reilly Proves How Stupid He Is Again

How O'Reilly Puts Out Right-Wing Propaganda

Fox News Insider Admits They Make Things Up

Luntz Admits Fox Has Anti-Obama Focus Groups

Reagan SG Says Health Care Bill Constitutional

O'Reilly Ignores Gore Answer To His Question

O'Reilly Wonders How The Moon Got There

More Republican Hate & Racism O'Reilly Has Ignored

Another Poll O'Reilly Has Totally Ignored

O'Reilly Thinks We Are Still In A Recession

O'Reilly's Nazi Comment Defense Was Laughable

Fox News The Least Trusted Cable News Network

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media (Again)

O'Reilly Claims Estate Tax A Seizure Of Property

O'Reilly Called Bernie Sanders A Loon

Bloomberg Tax Cut Poll Proves O'Reilly Was Lying

O'Reilly Ignored Positive DADT Study & Story

O'Reilly & Fox Ignore Judge Being A 9-11 Truther

More Real News O'Reilly Has Ignored

More Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Ratings

O'Reilly Got The Ireland Economic Crisis Wrong

O'Reilly Ignored The Tom Delay Conviction Story

Women Of America: You Need To Read This

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly Is Dishonest & Crazy

O'Reilly Nazi Comparison Hypocrisy

O'Reilly Ignores New Poll While Promoting Paladino

Andrew Sullivan Called O'Reilly A Dishonest Propagandist

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Nevada RCP Senate Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Right-Wing Abortion Bomber Terrorism Story

Fox & O'Reilly Ignored Friday Pro-Mosque NY Rally

O'Reilly Busted For Health Insurance Premium Lies

Most Factor Gear Made in Vietnam And China

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

O'Reilly Busted For 1st Time Retraction Lie

The Bill O'Reilly Non-Apology Shirley Sherrod Apology

O'Reilly & The Right Are Racist Idiots

O'Reilly Ignored Tea Party Express Racism Story

O'Reilly Compares Gay People To Al-Qaeda

Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Rating Polls

O'Reilly Ignored Mark Kirk Military Award Lie Story

Where Are The Sedition Charges Now O'Reilly

O'Reilly Caught In A Massive Lie About Jail Time

O'Reilly Running Ads For Emergency Food Supply

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Tea Party Militia Links

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Gallup Tea Party Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Harris Poll Showing Republicans Are Stupid

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Health Reform Bill Tax

O'Reilly Caught Lying About NEJM Health Care Survey

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

The Truth About Ratings For News Shows

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Spin Doctor

O'Reilly Spinning Fox News Most Trusted Poll

Fox News Did Not Air Hope For Haiti Telethon

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Obama Terrorism Polls

O'Reilly Caught Lying About House Ethics Committee

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Increase

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Limbaugh Racism

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Religious Festival

O'Reilly Caught Red Handed Lying About CNN

O'Reilly Caught Violating Journalistic Standards Again

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The ACLU & Racial Profiling

More Proof O'Reilly & FOX News Do Not Tell The Truth

O'Reilly Called Bruce Springsteen Un-American & Un-Patriotic

The Bill O'Reilly Senate Torture Report Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Obama Approval Numbers

FOX News Caught Lying About Obama Budget

O'Reilly Busted For Helping GOP Smear Pelosi

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Obama Earmark Promise Report Proves O'Reilly Wrong About Homeless Vets

O'Reilly Places 7th in 2008 Wingnut of The Year Award

O'Reilly Denys Reality About Abstinence Only Programs

Proof The O'Reilly Factor is Biased Against Barack Obama
O'Reilly said he is a non-partisan Independent, who is fair to both sides, and that he has been fair to Barack Obama. To check that claim I did a 3 month study of the Factor, it started on August 1st, 2008, and ran until October 31st, 2008. I watched the Factor every night and counted the negative and positive comments for Obama and McCain.

Visit the web page I set up, and you will see the stunning bias from O'Reilly and his mostly Republican guests against Barack Obama. Then you will see there is no doubt Bill O'Reilly is a dishonest and biased Conservative. This study is conclusive proof that O'Reilly is in the tank for John McCain.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The 3 Month Factor Bias Study:

Proof O'Reilly Lied About The Balance on His Show
O'Reilly claims the factor is balanced, and that he personally makes sure every week he has an equal number of Republican and Democrat guests. This is a bold faced lie, and I can prove it. I put together a web page that shows the guest list from the factor for the last 2 weeks. Read it and you will see with your own eyes that Bill O'Reilly is lying when he says the factor is balanced.

And remember that we are 3 weeks before a major Presidential election, or the Republican bias numbers would be worse than it is normally. O'Reilly is actually having more Democrats on than he usually does, and the balance is still not even close. If we were not so close to an election it would be a lot worse.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The Lies About The Factor Balance:

O'Reilly Sucks Investigation: Dishonesty, Deception, And Bias By Bill O'Reilly
O'Reilly claims there are no Republicans or Conservative groups that rival George Soros. O'Reilly said the top three conservative tax-exempt foundations are totally dwarfed by Soros and the radical Ford Foundation. And that they have 15 times more the assets. George Soros net worth is $8.5 billion, the Ford Foundation has a net worth of $13 billion. But the seven billionaires who donate to Newt Gingrich and other right-wing causes have a combined net worth of $34.8 billion dollars.

Somehow O'Reilly claims that Soros and the Ford Foundation have 15 times more the assets than anyone on the right. When the seven billionaires alone who give money to Newt, have roughly $14 billion more than Soros and the Ford Foundation combined.

Visit the web page below to see the massive money O'Reilly has ignored from the right:

(( Right-Wing Hate Speech Ignored by Bill O'Reilly ))
O'Reilly claims there is no hate on the right, that it's all on the left. But the way he defines hate is ridiculous, if a liberal blog or website writes an article that criticizes George W. Bush (or any Republican) O'Reilly calls it hate. When it's not hate, it's reporting the facts, there is no hate. A great example is when websites like,, etc. criticize O'Reilly he calls it hate, and says they are hate groups who lie about him.

That is a lie, it is not hate, and they are not hate websites. There is real hate on the internet, but O'Reilly does not report it, because most of it is from the right. I have documented this hate in my blog and on a web page, all of it was ignored by Bill O'Reilly, and it was never reported on the Factor.

Visit the web page below to see the massive right-wing hate O'Reilly has ignored: Privacy Policy

Copyright 2001 - 2014

eXTReMe Tracker