O'Reilly & Brit Hume Spin And Lie For Mitt Romney
By: Steve - July 18, 2012 - 10:00am
Here is a prime example of the right-wing bias from O'Reilly. He spins out some right-wing propaganda talking points memo full of lies, spin, and insane comparisons, then he has one guest on, a Republican, to agree with him, making it seem as if he is accurate, when in fact he is full of it.
On Monday O'Reilly actually compared Mitt Romney losing jobs and outsourcing jobs when he was the at Owner and CEO at Bain, to the GOVERNMENT providing loan money to the GE corporation. There is no comparison, none at all. And yet O'Reilly still did it, here is what the fool wrote:
O'REILLY: According to an analysis by FactCheck.org, Bain Capital did invest in companies that did outsource.
Now if you wanted proof O'Reilly is a right-wing spin doctor, there it is, right there. O'Reilly is spinning so much for Romney he should get paid as a political advisor for the Romney campaign.
But that's not unusual; so did the Obama administration, which has continued to make billions of taxpayer dollars available to General Electric, including grants for 'green energy' projects.
GE employs about 300,000 people, but fewer than half work in the USA. GE has plants in 43 countries and keeps overseas profits overseas, thereby avoiding U.S. income tax.
Here's the end game: Outsourcing is a fact of life in capitalism. The Obama administration has embraced corporations that embrace outsourcing, and so did Mitt Romney. So I'd call it a tie, with the Obama campaign having some deep explaining to do.
The comparison is ridiculous, Romney bought companies at Bain, then bankrupted them after taking all the money out of them and making a huge profit for himself and his investors, which also cost the economy thousands of jobs.
Romney also invested in companies in China that were used to outsourse American jobs, this is borderline treason, and he did it after recently saying he would be tougher on China than any other President, if he is elected. Are you kidding me, he is in bed with China, so he will not be tough on them, he will most likely help them get more jobs so he can make even more money off it.
But O'Reilly says nothing about that, instead he attacks Obama for doing accurate ads against Romney, that even he admitted were true. Not to mention O'Reilly ignoring all the money Romney is hiding in offshore accounts, or the fact that he will not come clean about his taxes. But when Kerry ran for President O'Reilly demanded he release 10 years of tax records.
Proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that O'Reilly is a biased right-wing hack who is doing everything he can to help Romney, and everything he can to hurt Obama, including lie and spin out right-wing propaganda.
Then O'Reilly had Brit Hume on, who said the attacks on Mitt Romney's private sector experience have done little damage. With nobody from the left to provide the balance in the debate, making it a biased one sided discussion with 2 Republicans who did noting but spin and lie for Romney.
Hume said this:
HUME: One begins to sense that the public thinks this is phony. This has been going on for some weeks and the Obama campaign has spent a lot of money hurling these charges related to Bain Capital, but it hasn't seemed to move the needle of public opinion. The Romney campaign seems to be keeping their powder dry and holding their money until later.
Here is a headline that proves Brit Hume is a lying right-wing idiot:
Bain Ads Hit Home In Swing States
Call me crazy, but if the ads are working in swing states that will decide the election I would say they are working, but not in Humeworld.
And here is a quote from the article: Polling suggests President Obama's attacks on Mitt Romney's private-equity background at Bain Capital are hurting the presumptive GOP nominee in key swing states.
Earth to Brit Hume, that means the ads are working, idiot!
Here is another headline for THE DISHONEST Brit Hume, from TPM: Bain Attacks Are Working
From the article: Priorities USA Action, the super PAC backing Obama has launched a series of attack ads focusing on Romney's record at Bain Capital. Their push to turn Romney's asset into a liability is working, the group says in a memo released Wednesday morning.
Polling commissioned by Priorities USA from the Garin-Hart-Yang Research Group and Global Strategy Group shows that voters in key swing states are now wary of Romney's business background.
Consistently, Obama's lead was greater in the markets where the ads had aired.
Where voters saw Priorities USA's ads, according to the memo, Obama leads Romney by 5 points more than in markets without the ads; Romney's unfavorables were 4 points higher where voters were exposed to the ads. Forty percent of voters who saw the ads said Romney's Bain experience made them less likely to vote for the candidate compared with 34 percent in sample of those who didn't see them.
I could go on with headline after headline that says the same thing, but Hume ignored it all to claim the ads are not doing anything to hurt Romney. Not to mention, Obama is not doing the ads, an Obama SuperPAC is, and neither O'Reilly or Hume disclosed that fact.
And what O'Reilly and Hume also never report on is that President Obama still leads with 333 projected electoral votes compared to 205 votes for Mitt Romney in the most recent Electoral College map projection. Which is how you win, with electoral votes.
Instead they spin and lie for Romney with bogus comparisons and one sided biased segments, with only right-wing partisan hacks on to discuss it.
Click Here to Visit The oreilly-sucks.com Home Page